Cargando…

Intimate partner violence and breastfeeding: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: The association between intimate partner violence (IPV) and breastfeeding is unclear. We conducted a systematic review to summarise the evidence of breastfeeding outcomes following exposure to IPV. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: We searched for published studies without study design...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Normann, Anne Katrine, Bakiewicz, Aleksandra, Kjerulff Madsen, Frederikke, Khan, Khalid Saeed, Rasch, Vibeke, Linde, Ditte Søndergaard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33130559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034153
_version_ 1783632144747200512
author Normann, Anne Katrine
Bakiewicz, Aleksandra
Kjerulff Madsen, Frederikke
Khan, Khalid Saeed
Rasch, Vibeke
Linde, Ditte Søndergaard
author_facet Normann, Anne Katrine
Bakiewicz, Aleksandra
Kjerulff Madsen, Frederikke
Khan, Khalid Saeed
Rasch, Vibeke
Linde, Ditte Søndergaard
author_sort Normann, Anne Katrine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The association between intimate partner violence (IPV) and breastfeeding is unclear. We conducted a systematic review to summarise the evidence of breastfeeding outcomes following exposure to IPV. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: We searched for published studies without study design or language restrictions (up to July 2019) in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS and The Global Health Library. Studies assessing various breastfeeding outcomes (initiation, duration and exclusive breastfeeding) in women exposed to IPV in any form (physical, psychological or sexual) and at any stage (1 year pre-pregnancy, during or post-pregnancy) were included. Two authors independently selected the studies and conducted the quality appraisal by use of the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results were summarised taking precision and quality into account. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies (participants n=414 393) were included and they adjusted for a total of 48 different confounders. The majority of studies were cross-sectional (n=11) and most studies were judged to be fair/low quality. Four out of seven studies found that IPV exposure shortened breastfeeding duration (adjusted ORs/aORs=0.22 (95% CI: 0.05–0.85), 1.18 (95% CI: 1.01–1.37), 5.92 (95% CI: 1.72–27.98), 1.28 (95% CI: 1.18–1.39)). Further, 5/10 studies found that IPV led to early termination of exclusive breastfeeding (aORs=1.53 (95% CI: 1.01–23.1), 0.83 (95% CI: 0.71–0.96), 1.35 (95% CI: 1.07–1.71), 0.17 (95% CI: 0.07–0.4), 1839 (95% CI: 1.61–2911)) and 2/6 studies found that IPV significantly reduced breastfeeding initiation (aORs=2.00 (95% CI: 1.2–3.3), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.7–0.93)). CONCLUSION: IPV exposure appears to associate negatively with some breastfeeding outcomes. Individual patient data meta-analysis is required to quantify the magnitude of the association for specific IPV-outcome combinations. More high-quality studies and definition of core confounders are warranted. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019129353.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7783610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77836102021-01-11 Intimate partner violence and breastfeeding: a systematic review Normann, Anne Katrine Bakiewicz, Aleksandra Kjerulff Madsen, Frederikke Khan, Khalid Saeed Rasch, Vibeke Linde, Ditte Søndergaard BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: The association between intimate partner violence (IPV) and breastfeeding is unclear. We conducted a systematic review to summarise the evidence of breastfeeding outcomes following exposure to IPV. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: We searched for published studies without study design or language restrictions (up to July 2019) in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS and The Global Health Library. Studies assessing various breastfeeding outcomes (initiation, duration and exclusive breastfeeding) in women exposed to IPV in any form (physical, psychological or sexual) and at any stage (1 year pre-pregnancy, during or post-pregnancy) were included. Two authors independently selected the studies and conducted the quality appraisal by use of the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results were summarised taking precision and quality into account. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies (participants n=414 393) were included and they adjusted for a total of 48 different confounders. The majority of studies were cross-sectional (n=11) and most studies were judged to be fair/low quality. Four out of seven studies found that IPV exposure shortened breastfeeding duration (adjusted ORs/aORs=0.22 (95% CI: 0.05–0.85), 1.18 (95% CI: 1.01–1.37), 5.92 (95% CI: 1.72–27.98), 1.28 (95% CI: 1.18–1.39)). Further, 5/10 studies found that IPV led to early termination of exclusive breastfeeding (aORs=1.53 (95% CI: 1.01–23.1), 0.83 (95% CI: 0.71–0.96), 1.35 (95% CI: 1.07–1.71), 0.17 (95% CI: 0.07–0.4), 1839 (95% CI: 1.61–2911)) and 2/6 studies found that IPV significantly reduced breastfeeding initiation (aORs=2.00 (95% CI: 1.2–3.3), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.7–0.93)). CONCLUSION: IPV exposure appears to associate negatively with some breastfeeding outcomes. Individual patient data meta-analysis is required to quantify the magnitude of the association for specific IPV-outcome combinations. More high-quality studies and definition of core confounders are warranted. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019129353. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7783610/ /pubmed/33130559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034153 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Normann, Anne Katrine
Bakiewicz, Aleksandra
Kjerulff Madsen, Frederikke
Khan, Khalid Saeed
Rasch, Vibeke
Linde, Ditte Søndergaard
Intimate partner violence and breastfeeding: a systematic review
title Intimate partner violence and breastfeeding: a systematic review
title_full Intimate partner violence and breastfeeding: a systematic review
title_fullStr Intimate partner violence and breastfeeding: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Intimate partner violence and breastfeeding: a systematic review
title_short Intimate partner violence and breastfeeding: a systematic review
title_sort intimate partner violence and breastfeeding: a systematic review
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33130559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034153
work_keys_str_mv AT normannannekatrine intimatepartnerviolenceandbreastfeedingasystematicreview
AT bakiewiczaleksandra intimatepartnerviolenceandbreastfeedingasystematicreview
AT kjerulffmadsenfrederikke intimatepartnerviolenceandbreastfeedingasystematicreview
AT khankhalidsaeed intimatepartnerviolenceandbreastfeedingasystematicreview
AT raschvibeke intimatepartnerviolenceandbreastfeedingasystematicreview
AT lindedittesøndergaard intimatepartnerviolenceandbreastfeedingasystematicreview