Cargando…
The Fallacy of Sham-Controlled Neurofeedback Trials: A Reply to Thibault and Colleagues (2018)
Background: Sham-controlled neurofeedback (NFB) trials consistently find no separation on ADHD outcome measures leading many to conclude that NFB’s beneficial effects are due to placebo. Method: We deconstruct the NFB training methodology and findings of six sham-controlled trials that assessed for...
Autores principales: | Pigott, H. Edmund, Cannon, Rex, Trullinger, Mark |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30078340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1087054718790802 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Los Thibault
por: Martin du Gard, Roger, 1881-1958
Publicado: (1974) -
Los Thibault
por: Martin Du Gard, Roger, 1881-1958
Publicado: (1951) -
Les Thibault
por: Martin du Gard, Roger, 1881-1958
Publicado: (1953) -
Response to Commentary of Dr. Robert T. Thibault and Dr. Hugo Pedder entitled: “Excess significance and power miscalculations in neurofeedback research”
por: Tursic, Anita, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
REPLY: Reply to Kumar and colleagues
por: Kirklin, James K.
Publicado: (2022)