Cargando…

The timeline of information exchange: a service evaluation of London Ambulance Service NHS Trust’s front line communication and emergency response to Exercise Unified Response

INTRODUCTION: Exercise Unified Response, Europe’s largest major incident training exercise to date, provided a rich environment for the emergency services to test their multi-agency crisis response capabilities. Supported by the London Ambulance Service NHS Trust, this service evaluation examined Lo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nunan, Jordan, Palfreyman-Jones, Samantha, Milne, Rebecca, Wakefield, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The College of Paramedics 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33456378
http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2020.12.4.4.40
_version_ 1783632195165880320
author Nunan, Jordan
Palfreyman-Jones, Samantha
Milne, Rebecca
Wakefield, Alison
author_facet Nunan, Jordan
Palfreyman-Jones, Samantha
Milne, Rebecca
Wakefield, Alison
author_sort Nunan, Jordan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Exercise Unified Response, Europe’s largest major incident training exercise to date, provided a rich environment for the emergency services to test their multi-agency crisis response capabilities. Supported by the London Ambulance Service NHS Trust, this service evaluation examined London Ambulance Service NHS Trust front line communication and decision-making via body-worn camera footage. METHODS: Twenty London Ambulance Service NHS Trust front line responders and evaluators were each equipped with a body-worn camera during Exercise Unified Response. The service evaluation aimed to: (a) produce timelines of the London Ambulance Service NHS Trust’s response in order to identify key events and actions during the ‘golden hour’ (the crucial first hour in the care of trauma patients), the proceedings of command meetings and the multi-agency response; and (b) develop recommendations for future training and evaluations. RESULTS: The service evaluation identified that, within the golden hour, London Ambulance Service NHS Trust first responders rightly and rapidly declared the event a major incident, requested resources and assigned roles. Triage crews were tasked quickly, though it was identified that their efficiency may be further enhanced through more detailed triage briefings prior to entering the scene. The command meetings (led by the Metropolitan Police) lacked efficiency, and all agencies could make more effective use of the multi-agency shared radio network to address ongoing matters. Finally, London Fire Brigade and London Ambulance Service NHS Trust teams demonstrated clear communication and co-ordination towards casualty extraction. CONCLUSION: Successful multi-agency working requires clear communication, information sharing and timely command meetings. It is recommended that Joint Emergency Services Interoperability Principles multi-agency talk groups should be utilised more frequently and used to complete a joint METHANE report. In addition, training in areas such as communication skills and detailed briefings will enhance the front line response. Finally, body-worn cameras are shown to be an effective service evaluation tool, as a basis for promoting best practice as well as highlighting areas for future training and evaluations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7783902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The College of Paramedics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77839022021-03-01 The timeline of information exchange: a service evaluation of London Ambulance Service NHS Trust’s front line communication and emergency response to Exercise Unified Response Nunan, Jordan Palfreyman-Jones, Samantha Milne, Rebecca Wakefield, Alison Br Paramed J Service Evaluation INTRODUCTION: Exercise Unified Response, Europe’s largest major incident training exercise to date, provided a rich environment for the emergency services to test their multi-agency crisis response capabilities. Supported by the London Ambulance Service NHS Trust, this service evaluation examined London Ambulance Service NHS Trust front line communication and decision-making via body-worn camera footage. METHODS: Twenty London Ambulance Service NHS Trust front line responders and evaluators were each equipped with a body-worn camera during Exercise Unified Response. The service evaluation aimed to: (a) produce timelines of the London Ambulance Service NHS Trust’s response in order to identify key events and actions during the ‘golden hour’ (the crucial first hour in the care of trauma patients), the proceedings of command meetings and the multi-agency response; and (b) develop recommendations for future training and evaluations. RESULTS: The service evaluation identified that, within the golden hour, London Ambulance Service NHS Trust first responders rightly and rapidly declared the event a major incident, requested resources and assigned roles. Triage crews were tasked quickly, though it was identified that their efficiency may be further enhanced through more detailed triage briefings prior to entering the scene. The command meetings (led by the Metropolitan Police) lacked efficiency, and all agencies could make more effective use of the multi-agency shared radio network to address ongoing matters. Finally, London Fire Brigade and London Ambulance Service NHS Trust teams demonstrated clear communication and co-ordination towards casualty extraction. CONCLUSION: Successful multi-agency working requires clear communication, information sharing and timely command meetings. It is recommended that Joint Emergency Services Interoperability Principles multi-agency talk groups should be utilised more frequently and used to complete a joint METHANE report. In addition, training in areas such as communication skills and detailed briefings will enhance the front line response. Finally, body-worn cameras are shown to be an effective service evaluation tool, as a basis for promoting best practice as well as highlighting areas for future training and evaluations. The College of Paramedics 2020-03-01 2020-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7783902/ /pubmed/33456378 http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2020.12.4.4.40 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Service Evaluation
Nunan, Jordan
Palfreyman-Jones, Samantha
Milne, Rebecca
Wakefield, Alison
The timeline of information exchange: a service evaluation of London Ambulance Service NHS Trust’s front line communication and emergency response to Exercise Unified Response
title The timeline of information exchange: a service evaluation of London Ambulance Service NHS Trust’s front line communication and emergency response to Exercise Unified Response
title_full The timeline of information exchange: a service evaluation of London Ambulance Service NHS Trust’s front line communication and emergency response to Exercise Unified Response
title_fullStr The timeline of information exchange: a service evaluation of London Ambulance Service NHS Trust’s front line communication and emergency response to Exercise Unified Response
title_full_unstemmed The timeline of information exchange: a service evaluation of London Ambulance Service NHS Trust’s front line communication and emergency response to Exercise Unified Response
title_short The timeline of information exchange: a service evaluation of London Ambulance Service NHS Trust’s front line communication and emergency response to Exercise Unified Response
title_sort timeline of information exchange: a service evaluation of london ambulance service nhs trust’s front line communication and emergency response to exercise unified response
topic Service Evaluation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33456378
http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2020.12.4.4.40
work_keys_str_mv AT nunanjordan thetimelineofinformationexchangeaserviceevaluationoflondonambulanceservicenhstrustsfrontlinecommunicationandemergencyresponsetoexerciseunifiedresponse
AT palfreymanjonessamantha thetimelineofinformationexchangeaserviceevaluationoflondonambulanceservicenhstrustsfrontlinecommunicationandemergencyresponsetoexerciseunifiedresponse
AT milnerebecca thetimelineofinformationexchangeaserviceevaluationoflondonambulanceservicenhstrustsfrontlinecommunicationandemergencyresponsetoexerciseunifiedresponse
AT wakefieldalison thetimelineofinformationexchangeaserviceevaluationoflondonambulanceservicenhstrustsfrontlinecommunicationandemergencyresponsetoexerciseunifiedresponse
AT nunanjordan timelineofinformationexchangeaserviceevaluationoflondonambulanceservicenhstrustsfrontlinecommunicationandemergencyresponsetoexerciseunifiedresponse
AT palfreymanjonessamantha timelineofinformationexchangeaserviceevaluationoflondonambulanceservicenhstrustsfrontlinecommunicationandemergencyresponsetoexerciseunifiedresponse
AT milnerebecca timelineofinformationexchangeaserviceevaluationoflondonambulanceservicenhstrustsfrontlinecommunicationandemergencyresponsetoexerciseunifiedresponse
AT wakefieldalison timelineofinformationexchangeaserviceevaluationoflondonambulanceservicenhstrustsfrontlinecommunicationandemergencyresponsetoexerciseunifiedresponse