Cargando…
Pre-hospital CPAP for acute respiratory failure: the ACUTE feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a common and life-threatening medical emergency. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is a potentially beneficial alternative treatment; however, it is uncertain whether this could improve important outcomes in NHS ambulance services. The ACUTE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The College of Paramedics
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783913/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447153 http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2019.12.4.3.53 |
_version_ | 1783632197793611776 |
---|---|
author | Fuller, Gordon W. Keating, Samuel Goodacre, Steve Herbert, Esther Perkins, Gavin Rosser, Andy Gunson, Imogen Ward, Matthew Miller, Josh Bradburn, Mike Thokala, Praveen Harris, Tim Marsh, Maggie Scott, Alex Cooper, Cindy |
author_facet | Fuller, Gordon W. Keating, Samuel Goodacre, Steve Herbert, Esther Perkins, Gavin Rosser, Andy Gunson, Imogen Ward, Matthew Miller, Josh Bradburn, Mike Thokala, Praveen Harris, Tim Marsh, Maggie Scott, Alex Cooper, Cindy |
author_sort | Fuller, Gordon W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a common and life-threatening medical emergency. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is a potentially beneficial alternative treatment; however, it is uncertain whether this could improve important outcomes in NHS ambulance services. The ACUTE study aimed to assess the feasibility of a large-scale pragmatic trial of pre-hospital CPAP. METHODS: The study was a pilot randomised controlled trial of the O-Two system CPAP mask versus standard oxygen therapy, with concealed allocation in identical sealed boxes. Feasibility objectives estimated the incidence of eligible patients; the proportion recruited and allocated to treatment appropriately; adherence to allocated treatment; and retention and data completeness. The primary clinical endpoint was 30-day mortality. Ancillary studies included an ARF incidence study, ARF diagnostic agreement study, clinician perceptions of CPAP mixed methods study and investigation of allocation concealment. RESULTS: Over 12 months, 77 patients were enrolled (target 120). CPAP was fully delivered in 74% (target 75%). There were no major protocol violations/non-compliances. Full data were available for all key outcomes (targets ≥ 90%). Thirty-day mortality was 27.3%. Of deceased patients, 14/21 (68%) either did not have a respiratory condition or had ceiling of treatment decisions implemented excluding hospital NIV and critical care. CONCLUSION: The ACUTE trial recruitment rate was below the target rate and feasibility was not demonstrated. Identification of patients who might benefit from pre-hospital CPAP was challenging. It appeared difficult to exclude conditions where CPAP would not work, or might be harmful, and to select appropriate patients where there was a meaningful chance of success, or where the potential advantages of pre-hospital CPAP would outweigh the burdens of more advanced and aggressive treatment. The limited compliance with CPAP, and the difficulty in identifying patients who could benefit from CPAP, indicate that pre-hospital CPAP is unlikely to materially reduce mortality. A definitive effectiveness trial of CPAP in the NHS is therefore not recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7783913 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The College of Paramedics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77839132021-01-13 Pre-hospital CPAP for acute respiratory failure: the ACUTE feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial Fuller, Gordon W. Keating, Samuel Goodacre, Steve Herbert, Esther Perkins, Gavin Rosser, Andy Gunson, Imogen Ward, Matthew Miller, Josh Bradburn, Mike Thokala, Praveen Harris, Tim Marsh, Maggie Scott, Alex Cooper, Cindy Br Paramed J College of Paramedics’ Research Conference 2019: Oral abstracts INTRODUCTION: Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a common and life-threatening medical emergency. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is a potentially beneficial alternative treatment; however, it is uncertain whether this could improve important outcomes in NHS ambulance services. The ACUTE study aimed to assess the feasibility of a large-scale pragmatic trial of pre-hospital CPAP. METHODS: The study was a pilot randomised controlled trial of the O-Two system CPAP mask versus standard oxygen therapy, with concealed allocation in identical sealed boxes. Feasibility objectives estimated the incidence of eligible patients; the proportion recruited and allocated to treatment appropriately; adherence to allocated treatment; and retention and data completeness. The primary clinical endpoint was 30-day mortality. Ancillary studies included an ARF incidence study, ARF diagnostic agreement study, clinician perceptions of CPAP mixed methods study and investigation of allocation concealment. RESULTS: Over 12 months, 77 patients were enrolled (target 120). CPAP was fully delivered in 74% (target 75%). There were no major protocol violations/non-compliances. Full data were available for all key outcomes (targets ≥ 90%). Thirty-day mortality was 27.3%. Of deceased patients, 14/21 (68%) either did not have a respiratory condition or had ceiling of treatment decisions implemented excluding hospital NIV and critical care. CONCLUSION: The ACUTE trial recruitment rate was below the target rate and feasibility was not demonstrated. Identification of patients who might benefit from pre-hospital CPAP was challenging. It appeared difficult to exclude conditions where CPAP would not work, or might be harmful, and to select appropriate patients where there was a meaningful chance of success, or where the potential advantages of pre-hospital CPAP would outweigh the burdens of more advanced and aggressive treatment. The limited compliance with CPAP, and the difficulty in identifying patients who could benefit from CPAP, indicate that pre-hospital CPAP is unlikely to materially reduce mortality. A definitive effectiveness trial of CPAP in the NHS is therefore not recommended. The College of Paramedics 2019-12-01 2019-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7783913/ /pubmed/33447153 http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2019.12.4.3.53 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | College of Paramedics’ Research Conference 2019: Oral abstracts Fuller, Gordon W. Keating, Samuel Goodacre, Steve Herbert, Esther Perkins, Gavin Rosser, Andy Gunson, Imogen Ward, Matthew Miller, Josh Bradburn, Mike Thokala, Praveen Harris, Tim Marsh, Maggie Scott, Alex Cooper, Cindy Pre-hospital CPAP for acute respiratory failure: the ACUTE feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial |
title | Pre-hospital CPAP for acute respiratory failure: the ACUTE feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Pre-hospital CPAP for acute respiratory failure: the ACUTE feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Pre-hospital CPAP for acute respiratory failure: the ACUTE feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Pre-hospital CPAP for acute respiratory failure: the ACUTE feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Pre-hospital CPAP for acute respiratory failure: the ACUTE feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | pre-hospital cpap for acute respiratory failure: the acute feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial |
topic | College of Paramedics’ Research Conference 2019: Oral abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783913/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447153 http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2019.12.4.3.53 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fullergordonw prehospitalcpapforacuterespiratoryfailuretheacutefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT keatingsamuel prehospitalcpapforacuterespiratoryfailuretheacutefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT goodacresteve prehospitalcpapforacuterespiratoryfailuretheacutefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT herbertesther prehospitalcpapforacuterespiratoryfailuretheacutefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT perkinsgavin prehospitalcpapforacuterespiratoryfailuretheacutefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT rosserandy prehospitalcpapforacuterespiratoryfailuretheacutefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT gunsonimogen prehospitalcpapforacuterespiratoryfailuretheacutefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wardmatthew prehospitalcpapforacuterespiratoryfailuretheacutefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT millerjosh prehospitalcpapforacuterespiratoryfailuretheacutefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bradburnmike prehospitalcpapforacuterespiratoryfailuretheacutefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thokalapraveen prehospitalcpapforacuterespiratoryfailuretheacutefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT harristim prehospitalcpapforacuterespiratoryfailuretheacutefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT marshmaggie prehospitalcpapforacuterespiratoryfailuretheacutefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT scottalex prehospitalcpapforacuterespiratoryfailuretheacutefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT coopercindy prehospitalcpapforacuterespiratoryfailuretheacutefeasibilityandpilotrandomisedcontrolledtrial |