Cargando…

Optimising ambulance service contribution to clinical trials: a phenomenological exploration using focus groups

INTRODUCTION: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest trials can prove challenging and there is a need to share learning from those that have recruited successfully. We have just completed three years of recruitment to PARAMEDIC2, a placebo-controlled trial of adrenaline in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pocock, Helen, Thomson, Michelle, Taylor, Sarah, Deakin, Charles D., England, Ed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The College of Paramedics 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447154
http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2019.12.4.3.55
_version_ 1783632199240646656
author Pocock, Helen
Thomson, Michelle
Taylor, Sarah
Deakin, Charles D.
England, Ed
author_facet Pocock, Helen
Thomson, Michelle
Taylor, Sarah
Deakin, Charles D.
England, Ed
author_sort Pocock, Helen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest trials can prove challenging and there is a need to share learning from those that have recruited successfully. We have just completed three years of recruitment to PARAMEDIC2, a placebo-controlled trial of adrenaline in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This study was designed to describe the experience of operational ambulance staff involved in recruiting patients into PARAMEDIC2. METHODS: Four focus groups involving trial paramedics and supporting members of the emergency care team were conducted across different geographical regions of a single UK ambulance service participating in the PARAMEDIC2 study. Data analysis was supported by NVivo 12 and themes were identified using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: Forty-four participants contributed to the focus groups. Four overarching themes were identified: context for the research, ethical concerns, concerns at the patient’s side and ongoing trial support. Participants felt that research such as PARAMEDIC2 is important and necessary to drive medical progress. They valued the opportunity to be part of a large project. Due to the deferred consent model employed, public awareness of the trial was felt to be important. Most expressed equipoise regarding adrenaline, but some felt concerned about enrolling younger patients and there was discussion around what constitutes a successful outcome. Struggles with ethical concerns were overcome through training and one-to-one discussion with research paramedics. Participants valued feedback on their performance of trial tasks, but also wanted feedback on their resuscitation skills. Cardiac arrest places a high cognitive demand on paramedics; simplicity and reinforcement of trial processes were key to facilitating recruitment. Caring for relatives was a high priority for paramedics and some felt conflicted about not discussing the trial with them. CONCLUSION: This study has provided insights into paramedic experience of a large-scale pre-hospital trial. Investment in time and resource to provide face-to-face training and personalised feedback to paramedics can foster engagement and optimise performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7783919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The College of Paramedics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77839192021-01-13 Optimising ambulance service contribution to clinical trials: a phenomenological exploration using focus groups Pocock, Helen Thomson, Michelle Taylor, Sarah Deakin, Charles D. England, Ed Br Paramed J College of Paramedics’ Research Conference 2019: Oral abstracts INTRODUCTION: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest trials can prove challenging and there is a need to share learning from those that have recruited successfully. We have just completed three years of recruitment to PARAMEDIC2, a placebo-controlled trial of adrenaline in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This study was designed to describe the experience of operational ambulance staff involved in recruiting patients into PARAMEDIC2. METHODS: Four focus groups involving trial paramedics and supporting members of the emergency care team were conducted across different geographical regions of a single UK ambulance service participating in the PARAMEDIC2 study. Data analysis was supported by NVivo 12 and themes were identified using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: Forty-four participants contributed to the focus groups. Four overarching themes were identified: context for the research, ethical concerns, concerns at the patient’s side and ongoing trial support. Participants felt that research such as PARAMEDIC2 is important and necessary to drive medical progress. They valued the opportunity to be part of a large project. Due to the deferred consent model employed, public awareness of the trial was felt to be important. Most expressed equipoise regarding adrenaline, but some felt concerned about enrolling younger patients and there was discussion around what constitutes a successful outcome. Struggles with ethical concerns were overcome through training and one-to-one discussion with research paramedics. Participants valued feedback on their performance of trial tasks, but also wanted feedback on their resuscitation skills. Cardiac arrest places a high cognitive demand on paramedics; simplicity and reinforcement of trial processes were key to facilitating recruitment. Caring for relatives was a high priority for paramedics and some felt conflicted about not discussing the trial with them. CONCLUSION: This study has provided insights into paramedic experience of a large-scale pre-hospital trial. Investment in time and resource to provide face-to-face training and personalised feedback to paramedics can foster engagement and optimise performance. The College of Paramedics 2019-12-01 2019-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7783919/ /pubmed/33447154 http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2019.12.4.3.55 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle College of Paramedics’ Research Conference 2019: Oral abstracts
Pocock, Helen
Thomson, Michelle
Taylor, Sarah
Deakin, Charles D.
England, Ed
Optimising ambulance service contribution to clinical trials: a phenomenological exploration using focus groups
title Optimising ambulance service contribution to clinical trials: a phenomenological exploration using focus groups
title_full Optimising ambulance service contribution to clinical trials: a phenomenological exploration using focus groups
title_fullStr Optimising ambulance service contribution to clinical trials: a phenomenological exploration using focus groups
title_full_unstemmed Optimising ambulance service contribution to clinical trials: a phenomenological exploration using focus groups
title_short Optimising ambulance service contribution to clinical trials: a phenomenological exploration using focus groups
title_sort optimising ambulance service contribution to clinical trials: a phenomenological exploration using focus groups
topic College of Paramedics’ Research Conference 2019: Oral abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33447154
http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2019.12.4.3.55
work_keys_str_mv AT pocockhelen optimisingambulanceservicecontributiontoclinicaltrialsaphenomenologicalexplorationusingfocusgroups
AT thomsonmichelle optimisingambulanceservicecontributiontoclinicaltrialsaphenomenologicalexplorationusingfocusgroups
AT taylorsarah optimisingambulanceservicecontributiontoclinicaltrialsaphenomenologicalexplorationusingfocusgroups
AT deakincharlesd optimisingambulanceservicecontributiontoclinicaltrialsaphenomenologicalexplorationusingfocusgroups
AT englanded optimisingambulanceservicecontributiontoclinicaltrialsaphenomenologicalexplorationusingfocusgroups