Cargando…

Is weight just a number? The accuracy of UK ambulance paediatric weight guidance – findings from a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: The weight of children provides the cornerstone of their clinical management, as many drug dosages, equipment sizes, fluid boluses, as well as DC shock energy, are administered on a per kilogram basis. Children who attend hospital are weighed using scales prior to receiving these interve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Charlton, Karl, Capsey, Matt, Moat, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The College of Paramedics 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33456391
http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2020.12.5.3.1
_version_ 1783632206540832768
author Charlton, Karl
Capsey, Matt
Moat, Chris
author_facet Charlton, Karl
Capsey, Matt
Moat, Chris
author_sort Charlton, Karl
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The weight of children provides the cornerstone of their clinical management, as many drug dosages, equipment sizes, fluid boluses, as well as DC shock energy, are administered on a per kilogram basis. Children who attend hospital are weighed using scales prior to receiving these interventions. This is not possible in the pre-hospital environment. A paucity of evidence exists to support the page for age weight guidance indicated by JRCALC, and it remains unknown if this approach meets the reference standard of 70% of estimations within 10% of actual weight and 95% within 20% of actual weight. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional study design and collected data from a convenience sample of children who attended the outpatients department of a major hospital in England between July and September 2019. All children aged between 1 and 11 years who were weighed were eligible for inclusion. Outcomes were to determine if the page for age approach meets the reference standard and to determine any implications for care. RESULTS: 341 children were included in this study. Each age group consisted of varying numbers of children. 50.5% (172/341) of the sample were female. Observed weights ranged from 8.28 to 82.70 kg (median 20.60 kg). The mean weight of girls versus boys was 24.69 kg and 23.39 kg respectively (95% CI -4.12–1.32, p = 0.3123). Observed weights were greater than the page for age guidance weight in all age groups, and the accuracy of page for age weight guidance diminished with age. Adrenaline 1:10,000 doses and defibrillation energy levels guided by page for age differ from those guided by weight, but are not deleterious to care. CONCLUSION: Page for age weight guidance does not meet the reference standard. Most paediatric pre-hospital care is administered by age and not weight. In the absence of an accurate weight, ambulance clinicians should continue to use the page for age system, although the gold standard remains to use an accurate weight measurement. While there are no facilities to weigh children in ambulances, if an accurate weight is available then consideration should be given to using this rather than age.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7783958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The College of Paramedics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77839582021-12-01 Is weight just a number? The accuracy of UK ambulance paediatric weight guidance – findings from a cross-sectional study Charlton, Karl Capsey, Matt Moat, Chris Br Paramed J Original Research BACKGROUND: The weight of children provides the cornerstone of their clinical management, as many drug dosages, equipment sizes, fluid boluses, as well as DC shock energy, are administered on a per kilogram basis. Children who attend hospital are weighed using scales prior to receiving these interventions. This is not possible in the pre-hospital environment. A paucity of evidence exists to support the page for age weight guidance indicated by JRCALC, and it remains unknown if this approach meets the reference standard of 70% of estimations within 10% of actual weight and 95% within 20% of actual weight. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional study design and collected data from a convenience sample of children who attended the outpatients department of a major hospital in England between July and September 2019. All children aged between 1 and 11 years who were weighed were eligible for inclusion. Outcomes were to determine if the page for age approach meets the reference standard and to determine any implications for care. RESULTS: 341 children were included in this study. Each age group consisted of varying numbers of children. 50.5% (172/341) of the sample were female. Observed weights ranged from 8.28 to 82.70 kg (median 20.60 kg). The mean weight of girls versus boys was 24.69 kg and 23.39 kg respectively (95% CI -4.12–1.32, p = 0.3123). Observed weights were greater than the page for age guidance weight in all age groups, and the accuracy of page for age weight guidance diminished with age. Adrenaline 1:10,000 doses and defibrillation energy levels guided by page for age differ from those guided by weight, but are not deleterious to care. CONCLUSION: Page for age weight guidance does not meet the reference standard. Most paediatric pre-hospital care is administered by age and not weight. In the absence of an accurate weight, ambulance clinicians should continue to use the page for age system, although the gold standard remains to use an accurate weight measurement. While there are no facilities to weigh children in ambulances, if an accurate weight is available then consideration should be given to using this rather than age. The College of Paramedics 2020-12-01 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7783958/ /pubmed/33456391 http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2020.12.5.3.1 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Charlton, Karl
Capsey, Matt
Moat, Chris
Is weight just a number? The accuracy of UK ambulance paediatric weight guidance – findings from a cross-sectional study
title Is weight just a number? The accuracy of UK ambulance paediatric weight guidance – findings from a cross-sectional study
title_full Is weight just a number? The accuracy of UK ambulance paediatric weight guidance – findings from a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Is weight just a number? The accuracy of UK ambulance paediatric weight guidance – findings from a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Is weight just a number? The accuracy of UK ambulance paediatric weight guidance – findings from a cross-sectional study
title_short Is weight just a number? The accuracy of UK ambulance paediatric weight guidance – findings from a cross-sectional study
title_sort is weight just a number? the accuracy of uk ambulance paediatric weight guidance – findings from a cross-sectional study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7783958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33456391
http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2020.12.5.3.1
work_keys_str_mv AT charltonkarl isweightjustanumbertheaccuracyofukambulancepaediatricweightguidancefindingsfromacrosssectionalstudy
AT capseymatt isweightjustanumbertheaccuracyofukambulancepaediatricweightguidancefindingsfromacrosssectionalstudy
AT moatchris isweightjustanumbertheaccuracyofukambulancepaediatricweightguidancefindingsfromacrosssectionalstudy