Cargando…

The Iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (IR-TBICS) scale: development and first evaluation

BACKGROUND: The rate at which mothers experience a cesarean section in the absence of medical signs is growing worldwide. Women’s beliefs and intentions play an essential role in the request or choice of a delivery method. At present, there is no comprehensive, validated scale for assessing pregnant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naghibi, Seyed Abolhassan, Khazaee-Pool, Maryam, Moosazadeh, Mahmood
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7784005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33402125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03498-3
_version_ 1783632216060854272
author Naghibi, Seyed Abolhassan
Khazaee-Pool, Maryam
Moosazadeh, Mahmood
author_facet Naghibi, Seyed Abolhassan
Khazaee-Pool, Maryam
Moosazadeh, Mahmood
author_sort Naghibi, Seyed Abolhassan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The rate at which mothers experience a cesarean section in the absence of medical signs is growing worldwide. Women’s beliefs and intentions play an essential role in the request or choice of a delivery method. At present, there is no comprehensive, validated scale for assessing pregnant women’s beliefs about cesarean section in the Iranian population. This study was performed to develop and assess the validity and reliability of the intention-based cesarean section scale using the theory of reasoned action (TRA) constructs as a theoretical framework for measuring intention toward the selection of a delivery method. METHODS: In this cross-sectional validation study, 480 pregnant women were recruited from Sari, in northern Iran, through a multistage random sampling approach. Content validity was examined using the content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR). Furthermore, both exploratory factor analyses (EFA) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were applied to assess the construct validity of the developed scale. Reliability was measured by internal consistency and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Quality criteria for floor and ceiling effects were derived from existing guidelines and consensus within our research group. RESULTS: The results obtained from the factor analysis showed that the data were fit to the model (χ2 = 2298.389, P < 0.001). The TRA comprised 24 items assessing five domains, which described 62.46% of the common variance. The CFA showed a model with suitable fitness for the data. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the domains of the scale ranged from 0.609 to 0.843, and the ICC value ranged from 0.71 to 0.84, which is within the satisfactory range. The IR-TBICS scale had no floor or ceiling effect on the total score or any of the dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: The belief-based cesarean section scale appears to be a reliable instrument. It is considered suitable and can be applied in other research in Iran.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7784005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77840052021-01-14 The Iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (IR-TBICS) scale: development and first evaluation Naghibi, Seyed Abolhassan Khazaee-Pool, Maryam Moosazadeh, Mahmood BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The rate at which mothers experience a cesarean section in the absence of medical signs is growing worldwide. Women’s beliefs and intentions play an essential role in the request or choice of a delivery method. At present, there is no comprehensive, validated scale for assessing pregnant women’s beliefs about cesarean section in the Iranian population. This study was performed to develop and assess the validity and reliability of the intention-based cesarean section scale using the theory of reasoned action (TRA) constructs as a theoretical framework for measuring intention toward the selection of a delivery method. METHODS: In this cross-sectional validation study, 480 pregnant women were recruited from Sari, in northern Iran, through a multistage random sampling approach. Content validity was examined using the content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR). Furthermore, both exploratory factor analyses (EFA) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were applied to assess the construct validity of the developed scale. Reliability was measured by internal consistency and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Quality criteria for floor and ceiling effects were derived from existing guidelines and consensus within our research group. RESULTS: The results obtained from the factor analysis showed that the data were fit to the model (χ2 = 2298.389, P < 0.001). The TRA comprised 24 items assessing five domains, which described 62.46% of the common variance. The CFA showed a model with suitable fitness for the data. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the domains of the scale ranged from 0.609 to 0.843, and the ICC value ranged from 0.71 to 0.84, which is within the satisfactory range. The IR-TBICS scale had no floor or ceiling effect on the total score or any of the dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: The belief-based cesarean section scale appears to be a reliable instrument. It is considered suitable and can be applied in other research in Iran. BioMed Central 2021-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7784005/ /pubmed/33402125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03498-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Naghibi, Seyed Abolhassan
Khazaee-Pool, Maryam
Moosazadeh, Mahmood
The Iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (IR-TBICS) scale: development and first evaluation
title The Iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (IR-TBICS) scale: development and first evaluation
title_full The Iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (IR-TBICS) scale: development and first evaluation
title_fullStr The Iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (IR-TBICS) scale: development and first evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The Iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (IR-TBICS) scale: development and first evaluation
title_short The Iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (IR-TBICS) scale: development and first evaluation
title_sort iranian version of theory-based intention for cesarean section (ir-tbics) scale: development and first evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7784005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33402125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03498-3
work_keys_str_mv AT naghibiseyedabolhassan theiranianversionoftheorybasedintentionforcesareansectionirtbicsscaledevelopmentandfirstevaluation
AT khazaeepoolmaryam theiranianversionoftheorybasedintentionforcesareansectionirtbicsscaledevelopmentandfirstevaluation
AT moosazadehmahmood theiranianversionoftheorybasedintentionforcesareansectionirtbicsscaledevelopmentandfirstevaluation
AT naghibiseyedabolhassan iranianversionoftheorybasedintentionforcesareansectionirtbicsscaledevelopmentandfirstevaluation
AT khazaeepoolmaryam iranianversionoftheorybasedintentionforcesareansectionirtbicsscaledevelopmentandfirstevaluation
AT moosazadehmahmood iranianversionoftheorybasedintentionforcesareansectionirtbicsscaledevelopmentandfirstevaluation