Cargando…
Crystal structure, Hirshfeld surface analysis and DFT study of 1-ethyl-3-phenyl-1,2-dihydroquinoxalin-2-one
In the title molecule, C(16)H(14)N(2)O, the dihydroquinoxaline moiety is not planar as there is a dihedral angle of 4.51 (5)° between the constituent rings. In the crystal, C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds form helical chains about the crystallographic 2(1) screw axis in the b-axis direction. Hirshfeld surfa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Union of Crystallography
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7784057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33520276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2056989020015819 |
Sumario: | In the title molecule, C(16)H(14)N(2)O, the dihydroquinoxaline moiety is not planar as there is a dihedral angle of 4.51 (5)° between the constituent rings. In the crystal, C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds form helical chains about the crystallographic 2(1) screw axis in the b-axis direction. Hirshfeld surface analysis indicates that the most important contributions to the crystal packing are from H⋯H (51.7%), H⋯C/C⋯H (26%) and H⋯O/O⋯H (8.5%) interactions. The optimized structure calculated using density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP/6–311 G(d,p) level is compared with the experimentally determined structure in the solid state. The calculated HOMO–LUMO energy gap is 3.8918 eV. |
---|