Cargando…
Validation of the adjusted multi-biomarker disease activity score as a prognostic test for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a combined analysis of multiple studies
BACKGROUND: The multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) test measures 12 serum protein biomarkers to quantify disease activity in RA patients. A newer version of the MBDA score, adjusted for age, sex, and adiposity, has been validated in two cohorts (OPERA and BRASS) for predicting risk for radiogra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7784276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33397438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-02389-4 |
_version_ | 1783632275672399872 |
---|---|
author | Curtis, Jeffrey R. Weinblatt, Michael E. Shadick, Nancy A. Brahe, Cecilie H. Østergaard, Mikkel Hetland, Merete Lund Saevarsdottir, Saedis Horton, Megan Mabey, Brent Flake, Darl D. Ben-Shachar, Rotem Sasso, Eric H. Huizinga, T. W. |
author_facet | Curtis, Jeffrey R. Weinblatt, Michael E. Shadick, Nancy A. Brahe, Cecilie H. Østergaard, Mikkel Hetland, Merete Lund Saevarsdottir, Saedis Horton, Megan Mabey, Brent Flake, Darl D. Ben-Shachar, Rotem Sasso, Eric H. Huizinga, T. W. |
author_sort | Curtis, Jeffrey R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) test measures 12 serum protein biomarkers to quantify disease activity in RA patients. A newer version of the MBDA score, adjusted for age, sex, and adiposity, has been validated in two cohorts (OPERA and BRASS) for predicting risk for radiographic progression. We now extend these findings with additional cohorts to further validate the adjusted MBDA score as a predictor of radiographic progression risk and compare its performance with that of other risk factors. METHODS: Four cohorts were analyzed: the BRASS and Leiden registries and the OPERA and SWEFOT studies (total N = 953). Treatments included conventional DMARDs and anti-TNFs. Associations of radiographic progression (ΔTSS) per year with the adjusted MBDA score, seropositivity, and clinical measures were evaluated using linear and logistic regression. The adjusted MBDA score was (1) validated in Leiden and SWEFOT, (2) compared with other measures in all four cohorts, and (3) used to generate curves for predicting risk of radiographic progression. RESULTS: Univariable and bivariable analyses validated the adjusted MBDA score and found it to be the strongest, independent predicator of radiographic progression (ΔTSS > 5) compared with seropositivity (rheumatoid factor and/or anti-CCP), baseline TSS, DAS28-CRP, CRP SJC, or CDAI. Neither DAS28-CRP, CDAI, SJC, nor CRP added significant information to the adjusted MBDA score as a predictor, and the frequency of radiographic progression agreed with the adjusted MBDA score when it was discordant with these measures. The rate of progression (ΔTSS > 5) increased from < 2% in the low (1–29) adjusted MBDA category to 16% in the high (45–100) category. A modeled risk curve indicated that risk increased continuously, exceeding 40% for the highest adjusted MBDA scores. CONCLUSION: The adjusted MBDA score was validated as an RA disease activity measure that is prognostic for radiographic progression. The adjusted MBDA score was a stronger predictor of radiographic progression than conventional risk factors, including seropositivity, and its prognostic ability was not significantly improved by the addition of DAS28-CRP, CRP, SJC, or CDAI. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-020-02389-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7784276 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77842762021-01-14 Validation of the adjusted multi-biomarker disease activity score as a prognostic test for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a combined analysis of multiple studies Curtis, Jeffrey R. Weinblatt, Michael E. Shadick, Nancy A. Brahe, Cecilie H. Østergaard, Mikkel Hetland, Merete Lund Saevarsdottir, Saedis Horton, Megan Mabey, Brent Flake, Darl D. Ben-Shachar, Rotem Sasso, Eric H. Huizinga, T. W. Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: The multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) test measures 12 serum protein biomarkers to quantify disease activity in RA patients. A newer version of the MBDA score, adjusted for age, sex, and adiposity, has been validated in two cohorts (OPERA and BRASS) for predicting risk for radiographic progression. We now extend these findings with additional cohorts to further validate the adjusted MBDA score as a predictor of radiographic progression risk and compare its performance with that of other risk factors. METHODS: Four cohorts were analyzed: the BRASS and Leiden registries and the OPERA and SWEFOT studies (total N = 953). Treatments included conventional DMARDs and anti-TNFs. Associations of radiographic progression (ΔTSS) per year with the adjusted MBDA score, seropositivity, and clinical measures were evaluated using linear and logistic regression. The adjusted MBDA score was (1) validated in Leiden and SWEFOT, (2) compared with other measures in all four cohorts, and (3) used to generate curves for predicting risk of radiographic progression. RESULTS: Univariable and bivariable analyses validated the adjusted MBDA score and found it to be the strongest, independent predicator of radiographic progression (ΔTSS > 5) compared with seropositivity (rheumatoid factor and/or anti-CCP), baseline TSS, DAS28-CRP, CRP SJC, or CDAI. Neither DAS28-CRP, CDAI, SJC, nor CRP added significant information to the adjusted MBDA score as a predictor, and the frequency of radiographic progression agreed with the adjusted MBDA score when it was discordant with these measures. The rate of progression (ΔTSS > 5) increased from < 2% in the low (1–29) adjusted MBDA category to 16% in the high (45–100) category. A modeled risk curve indicated that risk increased continuously, exceeding 40% for the highest adjusted MBDA scores. CONCLUSION: The adjusted MBDA score was validated as an RA disease activity measure that is prognostic for radiographic progression. The adjusted MBDA score was a stronger predictor of radiographic progression than conventional risk factors, including seropositivity, and its prognostic ability was not significantly improved by the addition of DAS28-CRP, CRP, SJC, or CDAI. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-020-02389-4. BioMed Central 2021-01-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7784276/ /pubmed/33397438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-02389-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Curtis, Jeffrey R. Weinblatt, Michael E. Shadick, Nancy A. Brahe, Cecilie H. Østergaard, Mikkel Hetland, Merete Lund Saevarsdottir, Saedis Horton, Megan Mabey, Brent Flake, Darl D. Ben-Shachar, Rotem Sasso, Eric H. Huizinga, T. W. Validation of the adjusted multi-biomarker disease activity score as a prognostic test for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a combined analysis of multiple studies |
title | Validation of the adjusted multi-biomarker disease activity score as a prognostic test for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a combined analysis of multiple studies |
title_full | Validation of the adjusted multi-biomarker disease activity score as a prognostic test for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a combined analysis of multiple studies |
title_fullStr | Validation of the adjusted multi-biomarker disease activity score as a prognostic test for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a combined analysis of multiple studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the adjusted multi-biomarker disease activity score as a prognostic test for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a combined analysis of multiple studies |
title_short | Validation of the adjusted multi-biomarker disease activity score as a prognostic test for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a combined analysis of multiple studies |
title_sort | validation of the adjusted multi-biomarker disease activity score as a prognostic test for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a combined analysis of multiple studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7784276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33397438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-02389-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT curtisjeffreyr validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies AT weinblattmichaele validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies AT shadicknancya validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies AT brahececilieh validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies AT østergaardmikkel validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies AT hetlandmeretelund validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies AT saevarsdottirsaedis validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies AT hortonmegan validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies AT mabeybrent validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies AT flakedarld validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies AT benshacharrotem validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies AT sassoerich validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies AT huizingatw validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies |