Cargando…

Validation of the adjusted multi-biomarker disease activity score as a prognostic test for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a combined analysis of multiple studies

BACKGROUND: The multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) test measures 12 serum protein biomarkers to quantify disease activity in RA patients. A newer version of the MBDA score, adjusted for age, sex, and adiposity, has been validated in two cohorts (OPERA and BRASS) for predicting risk for radiogra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Curtis, Jeffrey R., Weinblatt, Michael E., Shadick, Nancy A., Brahe, Cecilie H., Østergaard, Mikkel, Hetland, Merete Lund, Saevarsdottir, Saedis, Horton, Megan, Mabey, Brent, Flake, Darl D., Ben-Shachar, Rotem, Sasso, Eric H., Huizinga, T. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7784276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33397438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-02389-4
_version_ 1783632275672399872
author Curtis, Jeffrey R.
Weinblatt, Michael E.
Shadick, Nancy A.
Brahe, Cecilie H.
Østergaard, Mikkel
Hetland, Merete Lund
Saevarsdottir, Saedis
Horton, Megan
Mabey, Brent
Flake, Darl D.
Ben-Shachar, Rotem
Sasso, Eric H.
Huizinga, T. W.
author_facet Curtis, Jeffrey R.
Weinblatt, Michael E.
Shadick, Nancy A.
Brahe, Cecilie H.
Østergaard, Mikkel
Hetland, Merete Lund
Saevarsdottir, Saedis
Horton, Megan
Mabey, Brent
Flake, Darl D.
Ben-Shachar, Rotem
Sasso, Eric H.
Huizinga, T. W.
author_sort Curtis, Jeffrey R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) test measures 12 serum protein biomarkers to quantify disease activity in RA patients. A newer version of the MBDA score, adjusted for age, sex, and adiposity, has been validated in two cohorts (OPERA and BRASS) for predicting risk for radiographic progression. We now extend these findings with additional cohorts to further validate the adjusted MBDA score as a predictor of radiographic progression risk and compare its performance with that of other risk factors. METHODS: Four cohorts were analyzed: the BRASS and Leiden registries and the OPERA and SWEFOT studies (total N = 953). Treatments included conventional DMARDs and anti-TNFs. Associations of radiographic progression (ΔTSS) per year with the adjusted MBDA score, seropositivity, and clinical measures were evaluated using linear and logistic regression. The adjusted MBDA score was (1) validated in Leiden and SWEFOT, (2) compared with other measures in all four cohorts, and (3) used to generate curves for predicting risk of radiographic progression. RESULTS: Univariable and bivariable analyses validated the adjusted MBDA score and found it to be the strongest, independent predicator of radiographic progression (ΔTSS > 5) compared with seropositivity (rheumatoid factor and/or anti-CCP), baseline TSS, DAS28-CRP, CRP SJC, or CDAI. Neither DAS28-CRP, CDAI, SJC, nor CRP added significant information to the adjusted MBDA score as a predictor, and the frequency of radiographic progression agreed with the adjusted MBDA score when it was discordant with these measures. The rate of progression (ΔTSS > 5) increased from < 2% in the low (1–29) adjusted MBDA category to 16% in the high (45–100) category. A modeled risk curve indicated that risk increased continuously, exceeding 40% for the highest adjusted MBDA scores. CONCLUSION: The adjusted MBDA score was validated as an RA disease activity measure that is prognostic for radiographic progression. The adjusted MBDA score was a stronger predictor of radiographic progression than conventional risk factors, including seropositivity, and its prognostic ability was not significantly improved by the addition of DAS28-CRP, CRP, SJC, or CDAI. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-020-02389-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7784276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77842762021-01-14 Validation of the adjusted multi-biomarker disease activity score as a prognostic test for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a combined analysis of multiple studies Curtis, Jeffrey R. Weinblatt, Michael E. Shadick, Nancy A. Brahe, Cecilie H. Østergaard, Mikkel Hetland, Merete Lund Saevarsdottir, Saedis Horton, Megan Mabey, Brent Flake, Darl D. Ben-Shachar, Rotem Sasso, Eric H. Huizinga, T. W. Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: The multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) test measures 12 serum protein biomarkers to quantify disease activity in RA patients. A newer version of the MBDA score, adjusted for age, sex, and adiposity, has been validated in two cohorts (OPERA and BRASS) for predicting risk for radiographic progression. We now extend these findings with additional cohorts to further validate the adjusted MBDA score as a predictor of radiographic progression risk and compare its performance with that of other risk factors. METHODS: Four cohorts were analyzed: the BRASS and Leiden registries and the OPERA and SWEFOT studies (total N = 953). Treatments included conventional DMARDs and anti-TNFs. Associations of radiographic progression (ΔTSS) per year with the adjusted MBDA score, seropositivity, and clinical measures were evaluated using linear and logistic regression. The adjusted MBDA score was (1) validated in Leiden and SWEFOT, (2) compared with other measures in all four cohorts, and (3) used to generate curves for predicting risk of radiographic progression. RESULTS: Univariable and bivariable analyses validated the adjusted MBDA score and found it to be the strongest, independent predicator of radiographic progression (ΔTSS > 5) compared with seropositivity (rheumatoid factor and/or anti-CCP), baseline TSS, DAS28-CRP, CRP SJC, or CDAI. Neither DAS28-CRP, CDAI, SJC, nor CRP added significant information to the adjusted MBDA score as a predictor, and the frequency of radiographic progression agreed with the adjusted MBDA score when it was discordant with these measures. The rate of progression (ΔTSS > 5) increased from < 2% in the low (1–29) adjusted MBDA category to 16% in the high (45–100) category. A modeled risk curve indicated that risk increased continuously, exceeding 40% for the highest adjusted MBDA scores. CONCLUSION: The adjusted MBDA score was validated as an RA disease activity measure that is prognostic for radiographic progression. The adjusted MBDA score was a stronger predictor of radiographic progression than conventional risk factors, including seropositivity, and its prognostic ability was not significantly improved by the addition of DAS28-CRP, CRP, SJC, or CDAI. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-020-02389-4. BioMed Central 2021-01-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7784276/ /pubmed/33397438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-02389-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Curtis, Jeffrey R.
Weinblatt, Michael E.
Shadick, Nancy A.
Brahe, Cecilie H.
Østergaard, Mikkel
Hetland, Merete Lund
Saevarsdottir, Saedis
Horton, Megan
Mabey, Brent
Flake, Darl D.
Ben-Shachar, Rotem
Sasso, Eric H.
Huizinga, T. W.
Validation of the adjusted multi-biomarker disease activity score as a prognostic test for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a combined analysis of multiple studies
title Validation of the adjusted multi-biomarker disease activity score as a prognostic test for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a combined analysis of multiple studies
title_full Validation of the adjusted multi-biomarker disease activity score as a prognostic test for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a combined analysis of multiple studies
title_fullStr Validation of the adjusted multi-biomarker disease activity score as a prognostic test for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a combined analysis of multiple studies
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the adjusted multi-biomarker disease activity score as a prognostic test for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a combined analysis of multiple studies
title_short Validation of the adjusted multi-biomarker disease activity score as a prognostic test for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a combined analysis of multiple studies
title_sort validation of the adjusted multi-biomarker disease activity score as a prognostic test for radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a combined analysis of multiple studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7784276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33397438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-02389-4
work_keys_str_mv AT curtisjeffreyr validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies
AT weinblattmichaele validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies
AT shadicknancya validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies
AT brahececilieh validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies
AT østergaardmikkel validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies
AT hetlandmeretelund validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies
AT saevarsdottirsaedis validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies
AT hortonmegan validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies
AT mabeybrent validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies
AT flakedarld validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies
AT benshacharrotem validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies
AT sassoerich validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies
AT huizingatw validationoftheadjustedmultibiomarkerdiseaseactivityscoreasaprognostictestforradiographicprogressioninrheumatoidarthritisacombinedanalysisofmultiplestudies