Cargando…
What Influences the Choice of Ibrutinib–Rituximab vs Classic Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), with an incidence rate between 4 and 6 cases per 100,000 persons per year, is considered the most prevalent leukemia in the western world. Chemoimmunotherapy (such as fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab), bendamustine plus rituximab, and, more recently, n...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7784498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963689720950209 |
_version_ | 1783632302269530112 |
---|---|
author | Bravaccini, Sara Martinelli, Giovanni Cerchione, Claudio |
author_facet | Bravaccini, Sara Martinelli, Giovanni Cerchione, Claudio |
author_sort | Bravaccini, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), with an incidence rate between 4 and 6 cases per 100,000 persons per year, is considered the most prevalent leukemia in the western world. Chemoimmunotherapy (such as fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab), bendamustine plus rituximab, and, more recently, novel agents such as ibrutinib (Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor), idelalisib (phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase δ inhibitor), and venetoclax (BCL-2 inhibitor) have changed the management of CLL. Shanafelt and colleagues compared the efficacy of ibrutinib–rituximab with that of standard chemoimmunotherapy in patients with treatment-naïve CLL. They did not, however, mention that the therapy varies on the basis of where patients live and, given that local guidelines not immediately reflect US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) updates, discrepancies in treatment occur. Important CLL goals are the availability of rapidly reproducible tests, standardization of national and international guidelines, and FDA approval-based treatment reimbursement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7784498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77844982021-01-14 What Influences the Choice of Ibrutinib–Rituximab vs Classic Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia? Bravaccini, Sara Martinelli, Giovanni Cerchione, Claudio Cell Transplant Brief Communication Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), with an incidence rate between 4 and 6 cases per 100,000 persons per year, is considered the most prevalent leukemia in the western world. Chemoimmunotherapy (such as fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab), bendamustine plus rituximab, and, more recently, novel agents such as ibrutinib (Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor), idelalisib (phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase δ inhibitor), and venetoclax (BCL-2 inhibitor) have changed the management of CLL. Shanafelt and colleagues compared the efficacy of ibrutinib–rituximab with that of standard chemoimmunotherapy in patients with treatment-naïve CLL. They did not, however, mention that the therapy varies on the basis of where patients live and, given that local guidelines not immediately reflect US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) updates, discrepancies in treatment occur. Important CLL goals are the availability of rapidly reproducible tests, standardization of national and international guidelines, and FDA approval-based treatment reimbursement. SAGE Publications 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7784498/ /pubmed/32907382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963689720950209 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Bravaccini, Sara Martinelli, Giovanni Cerchione, Claudio What Influences the Choice of Ibrutinib–Rituximab vs Classic Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia? |
title | What Influences the Choice of Ibrutinib–Rituximab vs Classic Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia? |
title_full | What Influences the Choice of Ibrutinib–Rituximab vs Classic Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia? |
title_fullStr | What Influences the Choice of Ibrutinib–Rituximab vs Classic Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia? |
title_full_unstemmed | What Influences the Choice of Ibrutinib–Rituximab vs Classic Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia? |
title_short | What Influences the Choice of Ibrutinib–Rituximab vs Classic Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia? |
title_sort | what influences the choice of ibrutinib–rituximab vs classic chemoimmunotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia? |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7784498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963689720950209 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bravaccinisara whatinfluencesthechoiceofibrutinibrituximabvsclassicchemoimmunotherapyforchroniclymphocyticleukemia AT martinelligiovanni whatinfluencesthechoiceofibrutinibrituximabvsclassicchemoimmunotherapyforchroniclymphocyticleukemia AT cerchioneclaudio whatinfluencesthechoiceofibrutinibrituximabvsclassicchemoimmunotherapyforchroniclymphocyticleukemia |