Cargando…

What Influences the Choice of Ibrutinib–Rituximab vs Classic Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), with an incidence rate between 4 and 6 cases per 100,000 persons per year, is considered the most prevalent leukemia in the western world. Chemoimmunotherapy (such as fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab), bendamustine plus rituximab, and, more recently, n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bravaccini, Sara, Martinelli, Giovanni, Cerchione, Claudio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7784498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963689720950209
_version_ 1783632302269530112
author Bravaccini, Sara
Martinelli, Giovanni
Cerchione, Claudio
author_facet Bravaccini, Sara
Martinelli, Giovanni
Cerchione, Claudio
author_sort Bravaccini, Sara
collection PubMed
description Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), with an incidence rate between 4 and 6 cases per 100,000 persons per year, is considered the most prevalent leukemia in the western world. Chemoimmunotherapy (such as fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab), bendamustine plus rituximab, and, more recently, novel agents such as ibrutinib (Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor), idelalisib (phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase δ inhibitor), and venetoclax (BCL-2 inhibitor) have changed the management of CLL. Shanafelt and colleagues compared the efficacy of ibrutinib–rituximab with that of standard chemoimmunotherapy in patients with treatment-naïve CLL. They did not, however, mention that the therapy varies on the basis of where patients live and, given that local guidelines not immediately reflect US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) updates, discrepancies in treatment occur. Important CLL goals are the availability of rapidly reproducible tests, standardization of national and international guidelines, and FDA approval-based treatment reimbursement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7784498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77844982021-01-14 What Influences the Choice of Ibrutinib–Rituximab vs Classic Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia? Bravaccini, Sara Martinelli, Giovanni Cerchione, Claudio Cell Transplant Brief Communication Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), with an incidence rate between 4 and 6 cases per 100,000 persons per year, is considered the most prevalent leukemia in the western world. Chemoimmunotherapy (such as fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab), bendamustine plus rituximab, and, more recently, novel agents such as ibrutinib (Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor), idelalisib (phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase δ inhibitor), and venetoclax (BCL-2 inhibitor) have changed the management of CLL. Shanafelt and colleagues compared the efficacy of ibrutinib–rituximab with that of standard chemoimmunotherapy in patients with treatment-naïve CLL. They did not, however, mention that the therapy varies on the basis of where patients live and, given that local guidelines not immediately reflect US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) updates, discrepancies in treatment occur. Important CLL goals are the availability of rapidly reproducible tests, standardization of national and international guidelines, and FDA approval-based treatment reimbursement. SAGE Publications 2020-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7784498/ /pubmed/32907382 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963689720950209 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Bravaccini, Sara
Martinelli, Giovanni
Cerchione, Claudio
What Influences the Choice of Ibrutinib–Rituximab vs Classic Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?
title What Influences the Choice of Ibrutinib–Rituximab vs Classic Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?
title_full What Influences the Choice of Ibrutinib–Rituximab vs Classic Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?
title_fullStr What Influences the Choice of Ibrutinib–Rituximab vs Classic Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?
title_full_unstemmed What Influences the Choice of Ibrutinib–Rituximab vs Classic Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?
title_short What Influences the Choice of Ibrutinib–Rituximab vs Classic Chemoimmunotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?
title_sort what influences the choice of ibrutinib–rituximab vs classic chemoimmunotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia?
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7784498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907382
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963689720950209
work_keys_str_mv AT bravaccinisara whatinfluencesthechoiceofibrutinibrituximabvsclassicchemoimmunotherapyforchroniclymphocyticleukemia
AT martinelligiovanni whatinfluencesthechoiceofibrutinibrituximabvsclassicchemoimmunotherapyforchroniclymphocyticleukemia
AT cerchioneclaudio whatinfluencesthechoiceofibrutinibrituximabvsclassicchemoimmunotherapyforchroniclymphocyticleukemia