Cargando…

Multi-Stakeholder Dialogues as Instrument for Design and Qualitative Research in Educational Organisations

The article focuses on the value of group discussions both as a method of organisational development and as a method of empirical social research. These two perspectives are discussed as a “double meaning”, which often occurs simultaneously in different forms. The concept of “multi-stakeholder dialo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helbig, Christian, Hofhues, Sandra, Lukács, Bence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7784638/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55878-9_2
_version_ 1783632330985832448
author Helbig, Christian
Hofhues, Sandra
Lukács, Bence
author_facet Helbig, Christian
Hofhues, Sandra
Lukács, Bence
author_sort Helbig, Christian
collection PubMed
description The article focuses on the value of group discussions both as a method of organisational development and as a method of empirical social research. These two perspectives are discussed as a “double meaning”, which often occurs simultaneously in different forms. The concept of “multi-stakeholder dialogues” takes up this challenge. Following on from this, dimensions of the design and research of group discussions will be discussed. The contribution relates to the subproject “Multi-stakeholder Dialogues and Qualitative Evaluation” of the joint project “#ko.vernetzt”. The subproject had the task of accompanying, structuring and researching organisational development in a networked educational institution with dialogue formats. A total of nine dialogues were conducted with different groups of participants, six of which were analysed using qualitative methods. The research perspective is based on a concept of organisations from a praxeological perspective and an understanding of organisational culture as collective conjunctive experience. Thus, the object of qualitative research is the reconstruction of typical modus operandi of the processing of requirements. The results show that structural deficits in educational organisations are reproduced and reinforced by digitisation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7784638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77846382021-01-06 Multi-Stakeholder Dialogues as Instrument for Design and Qualitative Research in Educational Organisations Helbig, Christian Hofhues, Sandra Lukács, Bence Digital Transformation of Learning Organizations Article The article focuses on the value of group discussions both as a method of organisational development and as a method of empirical social research. These two perspectives are discussed as a “double meaning”, which often occurs simultaneously in different forms. The concept of “multi-stakeholder dialogues” takes up this challenge. Following on from this, dimensions of the design and research of group discussions will be discussed. The contribution relates to the subproject “Multi-stakeholder Dialogues and Qualitative Evaluation” of the joint project “#ko.vernetzt”. The subproject had the task of accompanying, structuring and researching organisational development in a networked educational institution with dialogue formats. A total of nine dialogues were conducted with different groups of participants, six of which were analysed using qualitative methods. The research perspective is based on a concept of organisations from a praxeological perspective and an understanding of organisational culture as collective conjunctive experience. Thus, the object of qualitative research is the reconstruction of typical modus operandi of the processing of requirements. The results show that structural deficits in educational organisations are reproduced and reinforced by digitisation. 2020-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7784638/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55878-9_2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
spellingShingle Article
Helbig, Christian
Hofhues, Sandra
Lukács, Bence
Multi-Stakeholder Dialogues as Instrument for Design and Qualitative Research in Educational Organisations
title Multi-Stakeholder Dialogues as Instrument for Design and Qualitative Research in Educational Organisations
title_full Multi-Stakeholder Dialogues as Instrument for Design and Qualitative Research in Educational Organisations
title_fullStr Multi-Stakeholder Dialogues as Instrument for Design and Qualitative Research in Educational Organisations
title_full_unstemmed Multi-Stakeholder Dialogues as Instrument for Design and Qualitative Research in Educational Organisations
title_short Multi-Stakeholder Dialogues as Instrument for Design and Qualitative Research in Educational Organisations
title_sort multi-stakeholder dialogues as instrument for design and qualitative research in educational organisations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7784638/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55878-9_2
work_keys_str_mv AT helbigchristian multistakeholderdialoguesasinstrumentfordesignandqualitativeresearchineducationalorganisations
AT hofhuessandra multistakeholderdialoguesasinstrumentfordesignandqualitativeresearchineducationalorganisations
AT lukacsbence multistakeholderdialoguesasinstrumentfordesignandqualitativeresearchineducationalorganisations