Cargando…

Modelling floppy iris syndrome and the impact of pupil size and ring devices on iris displacement

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this paper was to further develop a previously described finite element model which equates clinical iris billowing movements with mechanical buckling behaviour, simulating floppy iris syndrome. We wished to evaluate the impact of pupil dilation and mechanical devices on nor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lockington, David, Wang, Zhaokun, Qi, Nan, Malyugin, Boris, Cai, Li, Wang, Chenglei, Tang, Hui, Ramaesh, Kanna, Luo, Xiaoyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7784872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32020061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-0782-7
_version_ 1783632364134465536
author Lockington, David
Wang, Zhaokun
Qi, Nan
Malyugin, Boris
Cai, Li
Wang, Chenglei
Tang, Hui
Ramaesh, Kanna
Luo, Xiaoyu
author_facet Lockington, David
Wang, Zhaokun
Qi, Nan
Malyugin, Boris
Cai, Li
Wang, Chenglei
Tang, Hui
Ramaesh, Kanna
Luo, Xiaoyu
author_sort Lockington, David
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this paper was to further develop a previously described finite element model which equates clinical iris billowing movements with mechanical buckling behaviour, simulating floppy iris syndrome. We wished to evaluate the impact of pupil dilation and mechanical devices on normal iris and floppy iris models. METHODS: Theoretical mathematical modelling and computer simulations were used to assess billowing/buckling patterns of the iris under loading pressures for the undilated and dilated normal iris, the undilated and dilated floppy iris, and additionally with a mechanical ring device. RESULTS: For the normal iris, billowing/buckling occurred at a critical pressure of 19.92 mmHg for 5 mm pupil size, which increased to 28.00 mmHg (40.56%) with a 7 mm pupil. The Malyugin ring device significantly increased critical initiating buckling pressures in the normal iris scenario, to 34.58 mmHg (73.59%) for 7 mm ring with boundary conditions I (BC I) and 34.51 mmHg (73.24%) with BC II. For the most floppy iris modelling (40% degradation), initiating buckling value was 18.04 mmHg (−9.44%), which increased to 28.39 mmHg (42.52%) with the 7 mm ring. These results were much greater than for normal undilated iris without restrictive mechanical expansion (19.92 mmHg). CONCLUSION: This simulation demonstrates that pupil expansion devices inhibit iris billowing even in the setting of floppy iris syndrome. Our work also provides a model to further investigate the impact of pupil size or pharmacological interventions on anterior segment conditions affected by iris position.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7784872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77848722021-01-14 Modelling floppy iris syndrome and the impact of pupil size and ring devices on iris displacement Lockington, David Wang, Zhaokun Qi, Nan Malyugin, Boris Cai, Li Wang, Chenglei Tang, Hui Ramaesh, Kanna Luo, Xiaoyu Eye (Lond) Article INTRODUCTION: The aim of this paper was to further develop a previously described finite element model which equates clinical iris billowing movements with mechanical buckling behaviour, simulating floppy iris syndrome. We wished to evaluate the impact of pupil dilation and mechanical devices on normal iris and floppy iris models. METHODS: Theoretical mathematical modelling and computer simulations were used to assess billowing/buckling patterns of the iris under loading pressures for the undilated and dilated normal iris, the undilated and dilated floppy iris, and additionally with a mechanical ring device. RESULTS: For the normal iris, billowing/buckling occurred at a critical pressure of 19.92 mmHg for 5 mm pupil size, which increased to 28.00 mmHg (40.56%) with a 7 mm pupil. The Malyugin ring device significantly increased critical initiating buckling pressures in the normal iris scenario, to 34.58 mmHg (73.59%) for 7 mm ring with boundary conditions I (BC I) and 34.51 mmHg (73.24%) with BC II. For the most floppy iris modelling (40% degradation), initiating buckling value was 18.04 mmHg (−9.44%), which increased to 28.39 mmHg (42.52%) with the 7 mm ring. These results were much greater than for normal undilated iris without restrictive mechanical expansion (19.92 mmHg). CONCLUSION: This simulation demonstrates that pupil expansion devices inhibit iris billowing even in the setting of floppy iris syndrome. Our work also provides a model to further investigate the impact of pupil size or pharmacological interventions on anterior segment conditions affected by iris position. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-04 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7784872/ /pubmed/32020061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-0782-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Lockington, David
Wang, Zhaokun
Qi, Nan
Malyugin, Boris
Cai, Li
Wang, Chenglei
Tang, Hui
Ramaesh, Kanna
Luo, Xiaoyu
Modelling floppy iris syndrome and the impact of pupil size and ring devices on iris displacement
title Modelling floppy iris syndrome and the impact of pupil size and ring devices on iris displacement
title_full Modelling floppy iris syndrome and the impact of pupil size and ring devices on iris displacement
title_fullStr Modelling floppy iris syndrome and the impact of pupil size and ring devices on iris displacement
title_full_unstemmed Modelling floppy iris syndrome and the impact of pupil size and ring devices on iris displacement
title_short Modelling floppy iris syndrome and the impact of pupil size and ring devices on iris displacement
title_sort modelling floppy iris syndrome and the impact of pupil size and ring devices on iris displacement
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7784872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32020061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-0782-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lockingtondavid modellingfloppyirissyndromeandtheimpactofpupilsizeandringdevicesonirisdisplacement
AT wangzhaokun modellingfloppyirissyndromeandtheimpactofpupilsizeandringdevicesonirisdisplacement
AT qinan modellingfloppyirissyndromeandtheimpactofpupilsizeandringdevicesonirisdisplacement
AT malyuginboris modellingfloppyirissyndromeandtheimpactofpupilsizeandringdevicesonirisdisplacement
AT caili modellingfloppyirissyndromeandtheimpactofpupilsizeandringdevicesonirisdisplacement
AT wangchenglei modellingfloppyirissyndromeandtheimpactofpupilsizeandringdevicesonirisdisplacement
AT tanghui modellingfloppyirissyndromeandtheimpactofpupilsizeandringdevicesonirisdisplacement
AT ramaeshkanna modellingfloppyirissyndromeandtheimpactofpupilsizeandringdevicesonirisdisplacement
AT luoxiaoyu modellingfloppyirissyndromeandtheimpactofpupilsizeandringdevicesonirisdisplacement