Cargando…

A 3-year follow-up study of atropine treatment for progressive myopia in Europeans

BACKGROUND: Atropine is the most powerful treatment for progressive myopia in childhood. This study explores the 3-year effectiveness of atropine in a clinical setting. METHODS: In this prospective clinical effectiveness study, children with progressive myopia ≥ 1D/year or myopia ≤ −2.5D were prescr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polling, Jan Roelof, Tan, Emily, Driessen, Sjoerd, Loudon, Sjoukje E., Wong, Hoi-Lam, van der Schans, Astrid, Tideman, J. Willem L., Klaver, Caroline C. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7785025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32958872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-1122-7
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Atropine is the most powerful treatment for progressive myopia in childhood. This study explores the 3-year effectiveness of atropine in a clinical setting. METHODS: In this prospective clinical effectiveness study, children with progressive myopia ≥ 1D/year or myopia ≤ −2.5D were prescribed atropine 0.5%. Examination, including cycloplegic refraction and axial length (AL), was performed at baseline, and follow-up. Outcome measures were spherical equivalent (SER) and AL; annual progression of SER on treatment was compared with that prior to treatment. Adjustments to the dose were made after 1 year in case of low (AL ≥ 0.3 mm/year) or high response (AL < 0.1 mm/year) of AL. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients were enrolled in the study (median age: 9.5, range: 5–16 years). At baseline, median SER was −5.03D (interquartile range (IQR): 3.08); median AL was 25.14 mm (IQR: 1.30). N = 89 (71.8%) children were persistent to therapy throughout the 3-year follow-up. Median annual progression of SER for these children was −0.25D (IQR: 0.44); of AL 0.11 mm (IQR: 0.18). Of these, N = 32 (36.0%) had insufficient response and were assigned to atropine 1%; N = 26 (29.2%) showed good response and underwent tapering in dose. Rebound of AL progression was not observed. Of the children who ceased therapy, N = 9 were lost to follow-up; N = 9 developed an allergic reaction; and N = 17 (19.1%) stopped due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: In children with or at risk of developing high myopia, a starting dose of atropine 0.5% was associated with decreased progression in European children during a 3-year treatment regimen. Our study supports high-dose atropine as a treatment option for children at risk of developing high myopia in adulthood.