Cargando…
Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks
Medical exposure of the general population due to radiological investigations is the foremost source of all artificial ionising radiation. Here, we focus on a particular diagnostic radiological procedure, as only limited data are published with regard to radiation measurements during urethrograpic i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7785443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33424280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.08.026 |
_version_ | 1783632444978626560 |
---|---|
author | Alkhorayef, M. Sulieman, A. Barakat, H. Al-Mohammed, H.I. Theodorou, K. Kappas, C. Bradley, D. |
author_facet | Alkhorayef, M. Sulieman, A. Barakat, H. Al-Mohammed, H.I. Theodorou, K. Kappas, C. Bradley, D. |
author_sort | Alkhorayef, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Medical exposure of the general population due to radiological investigations is the foremost source of all artificial ionising radiation. Here, we focus on a particular diagnostic radiological procedure, as only limited data are published with regard to radiation measurements during urethrograpic imaging. Specifically, this work seeks to estimate patient and occupational effective doses during urethrographic procedures at three radiology hospitals. Both staff and patient X-ray exposure levels were calculated in terms of entrance surface air kerma (ESAK), obtained by means of lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD-100(LiF:Mg:Cu.P)) for 243 urethrographic examinations. Patient radiation effective doses per procedure were estimated using conversion factors obtained from the use of Public Health England computer software. In units of mGy, the median and range of ESAK per examination were found to be 10.8 (3.6–26.2), 7.0 (0.2–32.3), and 24.3 (9.0–32.0) in Hospitals A, B, and C, respectively. The overall mean and range of staff doses (in µGy) were found to be 310 (4.0–1750) per procedure. With the exception of hospital C, the present evaluations of radiation dose have been found to be similar to those of previously published research. The wide range of patient and staff doses illustrate the need for radiation dose optimisation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7785443 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77854432021-01-08 Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks Alkhorayef, M. Sulieman, A. Barakat, H. Al-Mohammed, H.I. Theodorou, K. Kappas, C. Bradley, D. Saudi J Biol Sci Original Article Medical exposure of the general population due to radiological investigations is the foremost source of all artificial ionising radiation. Here, we focus on a particular diagnostic radiological procedure, as only limited data are published with regard to radiation measurements during urethrograpic imaging. Specifically, this work seeks to estimate patient and occupational effective doses during urethrographic procedures at three radiology hospitals. Both staff and patient X-ray exposure levels were calculated in terms of entrance surface air kerma (ESAK), obtained by means of lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD-100(LiF:Mg:Cu.P)) for 243 urethrographic examinations. Patient radiation effective doses per procedure were estimated using conversion factors obtained from the use of Public Health England computer software. In units of mGy, the median and range of ESAK per examination were found to be 10.8 (3.6–26.2), 7.0 (0.2–32.3), and 24.3 (9.0–32.0) in Hospitals A, B, and C, respectively. The overall mean and range of staff doses (in µGy) were found to be 310 (4.0–1750) per procedure. With the exception of hospital C, the present evaluations of radiation dose have been found to be similar to those of previously published research. The wide range of patient and staff doses illustrate the need for radiation dose optimisation. Elsevier 2021-01 2020-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7785443/ /pubmed/33424280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.08.026 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Alkhorayef, M. Sulieman, A. Barakat, H. Al-Mohammed, H.I. Theodorou, K. Kappas, C. Bradley, D. Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks |
title | Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks |
title_full | Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks |
title_fullStr | Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks |
title_full_unstemmed | Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks |
title_short | Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks |
title_sort | urethrographic examinations: patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7785443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33424280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.08.026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alkhorayefm urethrographicexaminationspatientandstaffexposuresandassociatedradiobiologicalrisks AT suliemana urethrographicexaminationspatientandstaffexposuresandassociatedradiobiologicalrisks AT barakath urethrographicexaminationspatientandstaffexposuresandassociatedradiobiologicalrisks AT almohammedhi urethrographicexaminationspatientandstaffexposuresandassociatedradiobiologicalrisks AT theodorouk urethrographicexaminationspatientandstaffexposuresandassociatedradiobiologicalrisks AT kappasc urethrographicexaminationspatientandstaffexposuresandassociatedradiobiologicalrisks AT bradleyd urethrographicexaminationspatientandstaffexposuresandassociatedradiobiologicalrisks |