Cargando…

Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks

Medical exposure of the general population due to radiological investigations is the foremost source of all artificial ionising radiation. Here, we focus on a particular diagnostic radiological procedure, as only limited data are published with regard to radiation measurements during urethrograpic i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alkhorayef, M., Sulieman, A., Barakat, H., Al-Mohammed, H.I., Theodorou, K., Kappas, C., Bradley, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7785443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33424280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.08.026
_version_ 1783632444978626560
author Alkhorayef, M.
Sulieman, A.
Barakat, H.
Al-Mohammed, H.I.
Theodorou, K.
Kappas, C.
Bradley, D.
author_facet Alkhorayef, M.
Sulieman, A.
Barakat, H.
Al-Mohammed, H.I.
Theodorou, K.
Kappas, C.
Bradley, D.
author_sort Alkhorayef, M.
collection PubMed
description Medical exposure of the general population due to radiological investigations is the foremost source of all artificial ionising radiation. Here, we focus on a particular diagnostic radiological procedure, as only limited data are published with regard to radiation measurements during urethrograpic imaging. Specifically, this work seeks to estimate patient and occupational effective doses during urethrographic procedures at three radiology hospitals. Both staff and patient X-ray exposure levels were calculated in terms of entrance surface air kerma (ESAK), obtained by means of lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD-100(LiF:Mg:Cu.P)) for 243 urethrographic examinations. Patient radiation effective doses per procedure were estimated using conversion factors obtained from the use of Public Health England computer software. In units of mGy, the median and range of ESAK per examination were found to be 10.8 (3.6–26.2), 7.0 (0.2–32.3), and 24.3 (9.0–32.0) in Hospitals A, B, and C, respectively. The overall mean and range of staff doses (in µGy) were found to be 310 (4.0–1750) per procedure. With the exception of hospital C, the present evaluations of radiation dose have been found to be similar to those of previously published research. The wide range of patient and staff doses illustrate the need for radiation dose optimisation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7785443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77854432021-01-08 Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks Alkhorayef, M. Sulieman, A. Barakat, H. Al-Mohammed, H.I. Theodorou, K. Kappas, C. Bradley, D. Saudi J Biol Sci Original Article Medical exposure of the general population due to radiological investigations is the foremost source of all artificial ionising radiation. Here, we focus on a particular diagnostic radiological procedure, as only limited data are published with regard to radiation measurements during urethrograpic imaging. Specifically, this work seeks to estimate patient and occupational effective doses during urethrographic procedures at three radiology hospitals. Both staff and patient X-ray exposure levels were calculated in terms of entrance surface air kerma (ESAK), obtained by means of lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD-100(LiF:Mg:Cu.P)) for 243 urethrographic examinations. Patient radiation effective doses per procedure were estimated using conversion factors obtained from the use of Public Health England computer software. In units of mGy, the median and range of ESAK per examination were found to be 10.8 (3.6–26.2), 7.0 (0.2–32.3), and 24.3 (9.0–32.0) in Hospitals A, B, and C, respectively. The overall mean and range of staff doses (in µGy) were found to be 310 (4.0–1750) per procedure. With the exception of hospital C, the present evaluations of radiation dose have been found to be similar to those of previously published research. The wide range of patient and staff doses illustrate the need for radiation dose optimisation. Elsevier 2021-01 2020-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7785443/ /pubmed/33424280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.08.026 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Alkhorayef, M.
Sulieman, A.
Barakat, H.
Al-Mohammed, H.I.
Theodorou, K.
Kappas, C.
Bradley, D.
Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks
title Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks
title_full Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks
title_fullStr Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks
title_full_unstemmed Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks
title_short Urethrographic examinations: Patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks
title_sort urethrographic examinations: patient and staff exposures and associated radiobiological risks
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7785443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33424280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.08.026
work_keys_str_mv AT alkhorayefm urethrographicexaminationspatientandstaffexposuresandassociatedradiobiologicalrisks
AT suliemana urethrographicexaminationspatientandstaffexposuresandassociatedradiobiologicalrisks
AT barakath urethrographicexaminationspatientandstaffexposuresandassociatedradiobiologicalrisks
AT almohammedhi urethrographicexaminationspatientandstaffexposuresandassociatedradiobiologicalrisks
AT theodorouk urethrographicexaminationspatientandstaffexposuresandassociatedradiobiologicalrisks
AT kappasc urethrographicexaminationspatientandstaffexposuresandassociatedradiobiologicalrisks
AT bradleyd urethrographicexaminationspatientandstaffexposuresandassociatedradiobiologicalrisks