Cargando…
Material selection for tooth-supported single crowns—a survey among dentists in Germany
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to survey dentists in Germany to identify their favored materials for the fabrication of tooth-supported single crowns (SCs) depending on the location of the abutment teeth and the preparation margin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey included questions regarding demogra...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7785551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32556660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03363-9 |
_version_ | 1783632468479311872 |
---|---|
author | Rauch, Angelika Schrock, Annett Schierz, Oliver Hahnel, Sebastian |
author_facet | Rauch, Angelika Schrock, Annett Schierz, Oliver Hahnel, Sebastian |
author_sort | Rauch, Angelika |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to survey dentists in Germany to identify their favored materials for the fabrication of tooth-supported single crowns (SCs) depending on the location of the abutment teeth and the preparation margin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey included questions regarding demographic characteristics of dentists/their dental practice and preferred restorative materials for the fabrication of SCs for abutment teeth 16, 11, 34, and 36 with either supra- or subgingival preparation margins. RESULTS: Between August 2019 and February 2020, 721 dentists participated in the survey; responses from 33 dentists were excluded from data analysis because the dentists did not work in Germany or provided less than one fixed dental prosthesis/month. Dentists favored ceramic materials independent of the location of the abutment tooth and preparation margin (56.6–92.2%). CAD/CAM resin composites or full metals were preferred by only a few participants. A significantly higher proportion of dentists recommended porcelain fused to metal for subgingival preparation margins than for supragingival margins (p < 0.001). Characteristics of dentists/dental practices influenced a single scenario (11 subgingival) that was dependent on the dentist’s time since graduation. When asked to specify the ceramic materials, numerous participants wrote a free response (5.7–7.8%) or did not answer (0.7–4.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Dentists in Germany selected restorative materials for SCs depending on the clinical scenario. Since numerous dentists did not specify the ceramic materials, postgraduate information and education might help to extend expertise. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this survey provide insight into the favored materials of dentists for the fabrication of tooth-supported SCs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7785551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77855512021-01-11 Material selection for tooth-supported single crowns—a survey among dentists in Germany Rauch, Angelika Schrock, Annett Schierz, Oliver Hahnel, Sebastian Clin Oral Investig Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to survey dentists in Germany to identify their favored materials for the fabrication of tooth-supported single crowns (SCs) depending on the location of the abutment teeth and the preparation margin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey included questions regarding demographic characteristics of dentists/their dental practice and preferred restorative materials for the fabrication of SCs for abutment teeth 16, 11, 34, and 36 with either supra- or subgingival preparation margins. RESULTS: Between August 2019 and February 2020, 721 dentists participated in the survey; responses from 33 dentists were excluded from data analysis because the dentists did not work in Germany or provided less than one fixed dental prosthesis/month. Dentists favored ceramic materials independent of the location of the abutment tooth and preparation margin (56.6–92.2%). CAD/CAM resin composites or full metals were preferred by only a few participants. A significantly higher proportion of dentists recommended porcelain fused to metal for subgingival preparation margins than for supragingival margins (p < 0.001). Characteristics of dentists/dental practices influenced a single scenario (11 subgingival) that was dependent on the dentist’s time since graduation. When asked to specify the ceramic materials, numerous participants wrote a free response (5.7–7.8%) or did not answer (0.7–4.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Dentists in Germany selected restorative materials for SCs depending on the clinical scenario. Since numerous dentists did not specify the ceramic materials, postgraduate information and education might help to extend expertise. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this survey provide insight into the favored materials of dentists for the fabrication of tooth-supported SCs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-06-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7785551/ /pubmed/32556660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03363-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rauch, Angelika Schrock, Annett Schierz, Oliver Hahnel, Sebastian Material selection for tooth-supported single crowns—a survey among dentists in Germany |
title | Material selection for tooth-supported single crowns—a survey among dentists in Germany |
title_full | Material selection for tooth-supported single crowns—a survey among dentists in Germany |
title_fullStr | Material selection for tooth-supported single crowns—a survey among dentists in Germany |
title_full_unstemmed | Material selection for tooth-supported single crowns—a survey among dentists in Germany |
title_short | Material selection for tooth-supported single crowns—a survey among dentists in Germany |
title_sort | material selection for tooth-supported single crowns—a survey among dentists in germany |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7785551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32556660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03363-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rauchangelika materialselectionfortoothsupportedsinglecrownsasurveyamongdentistsingermany AT schrockannett materialselectionfortoothsupportedsinglecrownsasurveyamongdentistsingermany AT schierzoliver materialselectionfortoothsupportedsinglecrownsasurveyamongdentistsingermany AT hahnelsebastian materialselectionfortoothsupportedsinglecrownsasurveyamongdentistsingermany |