Cargando…

Cognitive Control in Suicide Ideators and Suicide Attempters

There is a need to understand more of the risk factors involved in the process from suicide ideation to suicide attempt. Cognitive control processes may be important factors in assessing vulnerability to suicide. A version of the Stroop procedure, Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Colo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brokke, Silje Støle, Landrø, Nils Inge, Haaland, Vegard Øksendal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7785752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33424712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.595673
_version_ 1783632488849997824
author Brokke, Silje Støle
Landrø, Nils Inge
Haaland, Vegard Øksendal
author_facet Brokke, Silje Støle
Landrø, Nils Inge
Haaland, Vegard Øksendal
author_sort Brokke, Silje Støle
collection PubMed
description There is a need to understand more of the risk factors involved in the process from suicide ideation to suicide attempt. Cognitive control processes may be important factors in assessing vulnerability to suicide. A version of the Stroop procedure, Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color–Word Interference Test (CWIT) and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-A) were used in this study to test attention control and cognitive shift, as well as to assess everyday executive function of 98 acute suicidal psychiatric patients. The Columbia Suicide History Form (CSHF) was used to identify a group of suicide ideators and suicide attempters. Results showed that suicide attempters scored lower on attention control than suicide ideators who had no history of attempted suicide. The self-report in the BRIEF-A inventory did not reflect any cognitive differences between suicide ideators and suicide attempters. A logistic regression analysis showed that a poorer attention control score was associated with the suicide attempt group, whereas a poorer cognitive shift score was associated with the suicide ideation group. The results found in this study suggest that suicide attempters may struggle with control of attention or inhibiting competing responses but not with cognitive flexibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7785752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77857522021-01-07 Cognitive Control in Suicide Ideators and Suicide Attempters Brokke, Silje Støle Landrø, Nils Inge Haaland, Vegard Øksendal Front Psychol Psychology There is a need to understand more of the risk factors involved in the process from suicide ideation to suicide attempt. Cognitive control processes may be important factors in assessing vulnerability to suicide. A version of the Stroop procedure, Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color–Word Interference Test (CWIT) and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-A) were used in this study to test attention control and cognitive shift, as well as to assess everyday executive function of 98 acute suicidal psychiatric patients. The Columbia Suicide History Form (CSHF) was used to identify a group of suicide ideators and suicide attempters. Results showed that suicide attempters scored lower on attention control than suicide ideators who had no history of attempted suicide. The self-report in the BRIEF-A inventory did not reflect any cognitive differences between suicide ideators and suicide attempters. A logistic regression analysis showed that a poorer attention control score was associated with the suicide attempt group, whereas a poorer cognitive shift score was associated with the suicide ideation group. The results found in this study suggest that suicide attempters may struggle with control of attention or inhibiting competing responses but not with cognitive flexibility. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7785752/ /pubmed/33424712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.595673 Text en Copyright © 2020 Brokke, Landrø and Haaland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Brokke, Silje Støle
Landrø, Nils Inge
Haaland, Vegard Øksendal
Cognitive Control in Suicide Ideators and Suicide Attempters
title Cognitive Control in Suicide Ideators and Suicide Attempters
title_full Cognitive Control in Suicide Ideators and Suicide Attempters
title_fullStr Cognitive Control in Suicide Ideators and Suicide Attempters
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Control in Suicide Ideators and Suicide Attempters
title_short Cognitive Control in Suicide Ideators and Suicide Attempters
title_sort cognitive control in suicide ideators and suicide attempters
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7785752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33424712
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.595673
work_keys_str_mv AT brokkesiljestøle cognitivecontrolinsuicideideatorsandsuicideattempters
AT landrønilsinge cognitivecontrolinsuicideideatorsandsuicideattempters
AT haalandvegardøksendal cognitivecontrolinsuicideideatorsandsuicideattempters