Cargando…
Cognitive Control in Suicide Ideators and Suicide Attempters
There is a need to understand more of the risk factors involved in the process from suicide ideation to suicide attempt. Cognitive control processes may be important factors in assessing vulnerability to suicide. A version of the Stroop procedure, Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Colo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7785752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33424712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.595673 |
_version_ | 1783632488849997824 |
---|---|
author | Brokke, Silje Støle Landrø, Nils Inge Haaland, Vegard Øksendal |
author_facet | Brokke, Silje Støle Landrø, Nils Inge Haaland, Vegard Øksendal |
author_sort | Brokke, Silje Støle |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a need to understand more of the risk factors involved in the process from suicide ideation to suicide attempt. Cognitive control processes may be important factors in assessing vulnerability to suicide. A version of the Stroop procedure, Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color–Word Interference Test (CWIT) and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-A) were used in this study to test attention control and cognitive shift, as well as to assess everyday executive function of 98 acute suicidal psychiatric patients. The Columbia Suicide History Form (CSHF) was used to identify a group of suicide ideators and suicide attempters. Results showed that suicide attempters scored lower on attention control than suicide ideators who had no history of attempted suicide. The self-report in the BRIEF-A inventory did not reflect any cognitive differences between suicide ideators and suicide attempters. A logistic regression analysis showed that a poorer attention control score was associated with the suicide attempt group, whereas a poorer cognitive shift score was associated with the suicide ideation group. The results found in this study suggest that suicide attempters may struggle with control of attention or inhibiting competing responses but not with cognitive flexibility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7785752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77857522021-01-07 Cognitive Control in Suicide Ideators and Suicide Attempters Brokke, Silje Støle Landrø, Nils Inge Haaland, Vegard Øksendal Front Psychol Psychology There is a need to understand more of the risk factors involved in the process from suicide ideation to suicide attempt. Cognitive control processes may be important factors in assessing vulnerability to suicide. A version of the Stroop procedure, Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color–Word Interference Test (CWIT) and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-A) were used in this study to test attention control and cognitive shift, as well as to assess everyday executive function of 98 acute suicidal psychiatric patients. The Columbia Suicide History Form (CSHF) was used to identify a group of suicide ideators and suicide attempters. Results showed that suicide attempters scored lower on attention control than suicide ideators who had no history of attempted suicide. The self-report in the BRIEF-A inventory did not reflect any cognitive differences between suicide ideators and suicide attempters. A logistic regression analysis showed that a poorer attention control score was associated with the suicide attempt group, whereas a poorer cognitive shift score was associated with the suicide ideation group. The results found in this study suggest that suicide attempters may struggle with control of attention or inhibiting competing responses but not with cognitive flexibility. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7785752/ /pubmed/33424712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.595673 Text en Copyright © 2020 Brokke, Landrø and Haaland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Brokke, Silje Støle Landrø, Nils Inge Haaland, Vegard Øksendal Cognitive Control in Suicide Ideators and Suicide Attempters |
title | Cognitive Control in Suicide Ideators and Suicide Attempters |
title_full | Cognitive Control in Suicide Ideators and Suicide Attempters |
title_fullStr | Cognitive Control in Suicide Ideators and Suicide Attempters |
title_full_unstemmed | Cognitive Control in Suicide Ideators and Suicide Attempters |
title_short | Cognitive Control in Suicide Ideators and Suicide Attempters |
title_sort | cognitive control in suicide ideators and suicide attempters |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7785752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33424712 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.595673 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brokkesiljestøle cognitivecontrolinsuicideideatorsandsuicideattempters AT landrønilsinge cognitivecontrolinsuicideideatorsandsuicideattempters AT haalandvegardøksendal cognitivecontrolinsuicideideatorsandsuicideattempters |