Cargando…

Coping during COVID-19: a mixed methods study of older cancer survivors

PURPOSE: Older cancer survivors are among the most vulnerable to the negative effects of COVID-19 and may need specific survivorship supports that are unavailable/restricted during the pandemic. The objective of this study was to explore how older adults (≥ 60 years) who were recently (≤ 12 months)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galica, Jacqueline, Liu, Ziwei, Kain, Danielle, Merchant, Shaila, Booth, Christopher, Koven, Rachel, Brundage, Michael, Haase, Kristen R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7786158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33404813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05929-5
_version_ 1783632572444573696
author Galica, Jacqueline
Liu, Ziwei
Kain, Danielle
Merchant, Shaila
Booth, Christopher
Koven, Rachel
Brundage, Michael
Haase, Kristen R.
author_facet Galica, Jacqueline
Liu, Ziwei
Kain, Danielle
Merchant, Shaila
Booth, Christopher
Koven, Rachel
Brundage, Michael
Haase, Kristen R.
author_sort Galica, Jacqueline
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Older cancer survivors are among the most vulnerable to the negative effects of COVID-19 and may need specific survivorship supports that are unavailable/restricted during the pandemic. The objective of this study was to explore how older adults (≥ 60 years) who were recently (≤ 12 months) discharged from the care of their cancer team were coping during the pandemic. METHODS: We used a convergent mixed method design (QUAL+quan). Quantitative data were collected using the Brief-COPE questionnaire. Qualitative data were collected using telephone interviews to explore experiences and strategies for coping with cancer-related concerns. RESULTS: The mean sample age (n = 30) was 72.1 years (SD 5.8, range 63–83) of whom 57% identified as female. Participants’ Brief-COPE responses indicated that they commonly used acceptance (n = 29, 96.7%), self-distraction (n = 28, 93.3%), and taking action (n = 28, 93.3%) coping strategies. Through our descriptive thematic analysis, we identified three themes: (1) drawing on lived experiences, (2) redeploying coping strategies, and (3) complications of cancer survivorship in a pandemic. Participants’ coping strategies were rooted in experiences with cancer, other illnesses, life, and work. Using these strategies during the pandemic was not new—they were redeployed and repurposed—although using them during the pandemic was sometimes complicated. These data were converged to maximize interpretation of the findings. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings may inform the development or enhancement of cancer and non-cancer resources to support coping, particularly using remote delivery methods within and beyond the pandemic. Clinicians can engage a strengths-based approach to support older cancer survivors as they draw from their experiences, which contain a repository of potential coping skills.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7786158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77861582021-01-06 Coping during COVID-19: a mixed methods study of older cancer survivors Galica, Jacqueline Liu, Ziwei Kain, Danielle Merchant, Shaila Booth, Christopher Koven, Rachel Brundage, Michael Haase, Kristen R. Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Older cancer survivors are among the most vulnerable to the negative effects of COVID-19 and may need specific survivorship supports that are unavailable/restricted during the pandemic. The objective of this study was to explore how older adults (≥ 60 years) who were recently (≤ 12 months) discharged from the care of their cancer team were coping during the pandemic. METHODS: We used a convergent mixed method design (QUAL+quan). Quantitative data were collected using the Brief-COPE questionnaire. Qualitative data were collected using telephone interviews to explore experiences and strategies for coping with cancer-related concerns. RESULTS: The mean sample age (n = 30) was 72.1 years (SD 5.8, range 63–83) of whom 57% identified as female. Participants’ Brief-COPE responses indicated that they commonly used acceptance (n = 29, 96.7%), self-distraction (n = 28, 93.3%), and taking action (n = 28, 93.3%) coping strategies. Through our descriptive thematic analysis, we identified three themes: (1) drawing on lived experiences, (2) redeploying coping strategies, and (3) complications of cancer survivorship in a pandemic. Participants’ coping strategies were rooted in experiences with cancer, other illnesses, life, and work. Using these strategies during the pandemic was not new—they were redeployed and repurposed—although using them during the pandemic was sometimes complicated. These data were converged to maximize interpretation of the findings. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings may inform the development or enhancement of cancer and non-cancer resources to support coping, particularly using remote delivery methods within and beyond the pandemic. Clinicians can engage a strengths-based approach to support older cancer survivors as they draw from their experiences, which contain a repository of potential coping skills. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7786158/ /pubmed/33404813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05929-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Galica, Jacqueline
Liu, Ziwei
Kain, Danielle
Merchant, Shaila
Booth, Christopher
Koven, Rachel
Brundage, Michael
Haase, Kristen R.
Coping during COVID-19: a mixed methods study of older cancer survivors
title Coping during COVID-19: a mixed methods study of older cancer survivors
title_full Coping during COVID-19: a mixed methods study of older cancer survivors
title_fullStr Coping during COVID-19: a mixed methods study of older cancer survivors
title_full_unstemmed Coping during COVID-19: a mixed methods study of older cancer survivors
title_short Coping during COVID-19: a mixed methods study of older cancer survivors
title_sort coping during covid-19: a mixed methods study of older cancer survivors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7786158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33404813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05929-5
work_keys_str_mv AT galicajacqueline copingduringcovid19amixedmethodsstudyofoldercancersurvivors
AT liuziwei copingduringcovid19amixedmethodsstudyofoldercancersurvivors
AT kaindanielle copingduringcovid19amixedmethodsstudyofoldercancersurvivors
AT merchantshaila copingduringcovid19amixedmethodsstudyofoldercancersurvivors
AT boothchristopher copingduringcovid19amixedmethodsstudyofoldercancersurvivors
AT kovenrachel copingduringcovid19amixedmethodsstudyofoldercancersurvivors
AT brundagemichael copingduringcovid19amixedmethodsstudyofoldercancersurvivors
AT haasekristenr copingduringcovid19amixedmethodsstudyofoldercancersurvivors