Cargando…

Evaluation of Single Sample Network Inference Methods for Metabolomics-Based Systems Medicine

[Image: see text] Networks and network analyses are fundamental tools of systems biology. Networks are built by inferring pair-wise relationships among biological entities from a large number of samples such that subject-specific information is lost. The possibility of constructing these sample (ind...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jahagirdar, Sanjeevan, Saccenti, Edoardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7786380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33267585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00696
_version_ 1783632613457526784
author Jahagirdar, Sanjeevan
Saccenti, Edoardo
author_facet Jahagirdar, Sanjeevan
Saccenti, Edoardo
author_sort Jahagirdar, Sanjeevan
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Networks and network analyses are fundamental tools of systems biology. Networks are built by inferring pair-wise relationships among biological entities from a large number of samples such that subject-specific information is lost. The possibility of constructing these sample (individual)-specific networks from single molecular profiles might offer new insights in systems and personalized medicine and as a consequence is attracting more and more research interest. In this study, we evaluated and compared LIONESS (Linear Interpolation to Obtain Network Estimates for Single Samples) and ssPCC (single sample network based on Pearson correlation) in the metabolomics context of metabolite–metabolite association networks. We illustrated and explored the characteristics of these two methods on (i) simulated data, (ii) data generated from a dynamic metabolic model to simulate real-life observed metabolite concentration profiles, and (iii) 22 metabolomic data sets and (iv) we applied single sample network inference to a study case pertaining to the investigation of necrotizing soft tissue infections to show how these methods can be applied in metabolomics. We also proposed some adaptations of the methods that can be used for data exploration. Overall, despite some limitations, we found single sample networks to be a promising tool for the analysis of metabolomics data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7786380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77863802021-01-07 Evaluation of Single Sample Network Inference Methods for Metabolomics-Based Systems Medicine Jahagirdar, Sanjeevan Saccenti, Edoardo J Proteome Res [Image: see text] Networks and network analyses are fundamental tools of systems biology. Networks are built by inferring pair-wise relationships among biological entities from a large number of samples such that subject-specific information is lost. The possibility of constructing these sample (individual)-specific networks from single molecular profiles might offer new insights in systems and personalized medicine and as a consequence is attracting more and more research interest. In this study, we evaluated and compared LIONESS (Linear Interpolation to Obtain Network Estimates for Single Samples) and ssPCC (single sample network based on Pearson correlation) in the metabolomics context of metabolite–metabolite association networks. We illustrated and explored the characteristics of these two methods on (i) simulated data, (ii) data generated from a dynamic metabolic model to simulate real-life observed metabolite concentration profiles, and (iii) 22 metabolomic data sets and (iv) we applied single sample network inference to a study case pertaining to the investigation of necrotizing soft tissue infections to show how these methods can be applied in metabolomics. We also proposed some adaptations of the methods that can be used for data exploration. Overall, despite some limitations, we found single sample networks to be a promising tool for the analysis of metabolomics data. American Chemical Society 2020-12-03 2021-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7786380/ /pubmed/33267585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00696 Text en © 2020 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccbyncnd_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Jahagirdar, Sanjeevan
Saccenti, Edoardo
Evaluation of Single Sample Network Inference Methods for Metabolomics-Based Systems Medicine
title Evaluation of Single Sample Network Inference Methods for Metabolomics-Based Systems Medicine
title_full Evaluation of Single Sample Network Inference Methods for Metabolomics-Based Systems Medicine
title_fullStr Evaluation of Single Sample Network Inference Methods for Metabolomics-Based Systems Medicine
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Single Sample Network Inference Methods for Metabolomics-Based Systems Medicine
title_short Evaluation of Single Sample Network Inference Methods for Metabolomics-Based Systems Medicine
title_sort evaluation of single sample network inference methods for metabolomics-based systems medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7786380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33267585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00696
work_keys_str_mv AT jahagirdarsanjeevan evaluationofsinglesamplenetworkinferencemethodsformetabolomicsbasedsystemsmedicine
AT saccentiedoardo evaluationofsinglesamplenetworkinferencemethodsformetabolomicsbasedsystemsmedicine