Response to ‘Methodological flaws on “manual therapy for the pediatric population: a systematic review” by Prevost et al. (2019)’

Correspondence from Yu et al. identify methodological issues with the systematic review of manual therapy for pediatric manuscript. Like any research study, limitations are important for readers to keep in consideration when reviewing study findings. The primary authors maintain full confidence in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pohlman, Katherine A., Anderson, Kristian, Carleo, Beth, Gleberzon, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Correspondence
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7786483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33402175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-03165-2
_version_ 1783632634775076864
author Pohlman, Katherine A.
Anderson, Kristian
Carleo, Beth
Gleberzon, Brian
author_facet Pohlman, Katherine A.
Anderson, Kristian
Carleo, Beth
Gleberzon, Brian
author_sort Pohlman, Katherine A.
collection PubMed
description Correspondence from Yu et al. identify methodological issues with the systematic review of manual therapy for pediatric manuscript. Like any research study, limitations are important for readers to keep in consideration when reviewing study findings. The primary authors maintain full confidence in the use of the review to provide practicing clinicians with a comprehensive overview of the limited and low-quality available evidence regarding manual therapies for the pediatric patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7786483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77864832021-01-07 Response to ‘Methodological flaws on “manual therapy for the pediatric population: a systematic review” by Prevost et al. (2019)’ Pohlman, Katherine A. Anderson, Kristian Carleo, Beth Gleberzon, Brian BMC Complement Med Ther Correspondence Correspondence from Yu et al. identify methodological issues with the systematic review of manual therapy for pediatric manuscript. Like any research study, limitations are important for readers to keep in consideration when reviewing study findings. The primary authors maintain full confidence in the use of the review to provide practicing clinicians with a comprehensive overview of the limited and low-quality available evidence regarding manual therapies for the pediatric patient. BioMed Central 2021-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7786483/ /pubmed/33402175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-03165-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Pohlman, Katherine A.
Anderson, Kristian
Carleo, Beth
Gleberzon, Brian
Response to ‘Methodological flaws on “manual therapy for the pediatric population: a systematic review” by Prevost et al. (2019)’
title Response to ‘Methodological flaws on “manual therapy for the pediatric population: a systematic review” by Prevost et al. (2019)’
title_full Response to ‘Methodological flaws on “manual therapy for the pediatric population: a systematic review” by Prevost et al. (2019)’
title_fullStr Response to ‘Methodological flaws on “manual therapy for the pediatric population: a systematic review” by Prevost et al. (2019)’
title_full_unstemmed Response to ‘Methodological flaws on “manual therapy for the pediatric population: a systematic review” by Prevost et al. (2019)’
title_short Response to ‘Methodological flaws on “manual therapy for the pediatric population: a systematic review” by Prevost et al. (2019)’
title_sort response to ‘methodological flaws on “manual therapy for the pediatric population: a systematic review” by prevost et al. (2019)’
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7786483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33402175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-03165-2
work_keys_str_mv AT pohlmankatherinea responsetomethodologicalflawsonmanualtherapyforthepediatricpopulationasystematicreviewbyprevostetal2019
AT andersonkristian responsetomethodologicalflawsonmanualtherapyforthepediatricpopulationasystematicreviewbyprevostetal2019
AT carleobeth responsetomethodologicalflawsonmanualtherapyforthepediatricpopulationasystematicreviewbyprevostetal2019
AT gleberzonbrian responsetomethodologicalflawsonmanualtherapyforthepediatricpopulationasystematicreviewbyprevostetal2019

Ejemplares similares