Cargando…
Response to ‘Methodological flaws on “manual therapy for the pediatric population: a systematic review” by Prevost et al. (2019)’
Correspondence from Yu et al. identify methodological issues with the systematic review of manual therapy for pediatric manuscript. Like any research study, limitations are important for readers to keep in consideration when reviewing study findings. The primary authors maintain full confidence in t...
Autores principales: | Pohlman, Katherine A., Anderson, Kristian, Carleo, Beth, Gleberzon, Brian |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7786483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33402175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-03165-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Methodological flaws on “manual therapy for the pediatric population: a systematic review” by Prevost et al. (2019)
por: Yu, Hainan, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Manual therapy for the pediatric population: a systematic review
por: Parnell Prevost, Carol, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Patient-centered outcomes used in pediatric focused manual therapies research studies: a secondary data analysis of a systematic review
por: Carleo, Beth, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Flawed conclusions on the Västerbotten Intervention Program by San Sebastian et .al
por: Blomstedt, Yulia, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Proving a negative? Methodological, statistical, and psychometric flaws in Ullmann et al. (2017) PTSD study
por: Boyle, Gregory J.
Publicado: (2018)