Cargando…

Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty?

Patients are increasingly using online rating websites to obtain information about physicians and to provide feedback. We performed an analysis of urologist online ratings, with specific focus on the relationship between overall rating and urologist subspecialty. We conducted an analysis of urologis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zillioux, Jacqueline, Pike, C William, Sharma, Devang, Rapp, David E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7786750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33457546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373520951901
_version_ 1783632694735798272
author Zillioux, Jacqueline
Pike, C William
Sharma, Devang
Rapp, David E
author_facet Zillioux, Jacqueline
Pike, C William
Sharma, Devang
Rapp, David E
author_sort Zillioux, Jacqueline
collection PubMed
description Patients are increasingly using online rating websites to obtain information about physicians and to provide feedback. We performed an analysis of urologist online ratings, with specific focus on the relationship between overall rating and urologist subspecialty. We conducted an analysis of urologist ratings on Healthgrades.com. Ratings were sampled across 4 US geographical regions, with focus across 3 practice types (large and small private practice, academic) and 7 urologic subspecialties. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for differences among subgroup ratings. Data were analyzed for 954 urologists with a mean age of 53 (±10) years. The median overall urologist rating was 4.0 [3.4-4.7]. Providers in an academic practice type or robotics/oncology subspecialty had statistically significantly higher ratings when compared to other practice settings or subspecialties (P < 0.001). All other comparisons between practice types, specialties, regions, and sexes failed to demonstrate statistically significant differences. In our study of online urologist ratings, robotics/oncology subspecialty and academic practice setting were associated with higher overall ratings. Further study is needed to assess reasons underlying this difference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7786750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77867502021-01-14 Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty? Zillioux, Jacqueline Pike, C William Sharma, Devang Rapp, David E J Patient Exp Research Articles Patients are increasingly using online rating websites to obtain information about physicians and to provide feedback. We performed an analysis of urologist online ratings, with specific focus on the relationship between overall rating and urologist subspecialty. We conducted an analysis of urologist ratings on Healthgrades.com. Ratings were sampled across 4 US geographical regions, with focus across 3 practice types (large and small private practice, academic) and 7 urologic subspecialties. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for differences among subgroup ratings. Data were analyzed for 954 urologists with a mean age of 53 (±10) years. The median overall urologist rating was 4.0 [3.4-4.7]. Providers in an academic practice type or robotics/oncology subspecialty had statistically significantly higher ratings when compared to other practice settings or subspecialties (P < 0.001). All other comparisons between practice types, specialties, regions, and sexes failed to demonstrate statistically significant differences. In our study of online urologist ratings, robotics/oncology subspecialty and academic practice setting were associated with higher overall ratings. Further study is needed to assess reasons underlying this difference. SAGE Publications 2020-08-24 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7786750/ /pubmed/33457546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373520951901 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Zillioux, Jacqueline
Pike, C William
Sharma, Devang
Rapp, David E
Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty?
title Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty?
title_full Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty?
title_fullStr Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty?
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty?
title_short Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty?
title_sort analysis of online urologist ratings: are rating differences associated with subspecialty?
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7786750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33457546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373520951901
work_keys_str_mv AT zilliouxjacqueline analysisofonlineurologistratingsareratingdifferencesassociatedwithsubspecialty
AT pikecwilliam analysisofonlineurologistratingsareratingdifferencesassociatedwithsubspecialty
AT sharmadevang analysisofonlineurologistratingsareratingdifferencesassociatedwithsubspecialty
AT rappdavide analysisofonlineurologistratingsareratingdifferencesassociatedwithsubspecialty