Cargando…
Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty?
Patients are increasingly using online rating websites to obtain information about physicians and to provide feedback. We performed an analysis of urologist online ratings, with specific focus on the relationship between overall rating and urologist subspecialty. We conducted an analysis of urologis...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7786750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33457546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373520951901 |
_version_ | 1783632694735798272 |
---|---|
author | Zillioux, Jacqueline Pike, C William Sharma, Devang Rapp, David E |
author_facet | Zillioux, Jacqueline Pike, C William Sharma, Devang Rapp, David E |
author_sort | Zillioux, Jacqueline |
collection | PubMed |
description | Patients are increasingly using online rating websites to obtain information about physicians and to provide feedback. We performed an analysis of urologist online ratings, with specific focus on the relationship between overall rating and urologist subspecialty. We conducted an analysis of urologist ratings on Healthgrades.com. Ratings were sampled across 4 US geographical regions, with focus across 3 practice types (large and small private practice, academic) and 7 urologic subspecialties. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for differences among subgroup ratings. Data were analyzed for 954 urologists with a mean age of 53 (±10) years. The median overall urologist rating was 4.0 [3.4-4.7]. Providers in an academic practice type or robotics/oncology subspecialty had statistically significantly higher ratings when compared to other practice settings or subspecialties (P < 0.001). All other comparisons between practice types, specialties, regions, and sexes failed to demonstrate statistically significant differences. In our study of online urologist ratings, robotics/oncology subspecialty and academic practice setting were associated with higher overall ratings. Further study is needed to assess reasons underlying this difference. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7786750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77867502021-01-14 Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty? Zillioux, Jacqueline Pike, C William Sharma, Devang Rapp, David E J Patient Exp Research Articles Patients are increasingly using online rating websites to obtain information about physicians and to provide feedback. We performed an analysis of urologist online ratings, with specific focus on the relationship between overall rating and urologist subspecialty. We conducted an analysis of urologist ratings on Healthgrades.com. Ratings were sampled across 4 US geographical regions, with focus across 3 practice types (large and small private practice, academic) and 7 urologic subspecialties. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for differences among subgroup ratings. Data were analyzed for 954 urologists with a mean age of 53 (±10) years. The median overall urologist rating was 4.0 [3.4-4.7]. Providers in an academic practice type or robotics/oncology subspecialty had statistically significantly higher ratings when compared to other practice settings or subspecialties (P < 0.001). All other comparisons between practice types, specialties, regions, and sexes failed to demonstrate statistically significant differences. In our study of online urologist ratings, robotics/oncology subspecialty and academic practice setting were associated with higher overall ratings. Further study is needed to assess reasons underlying this difference. SAGE Publications 2020-08-24 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7786750/ /pubmed/33457546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373520951901 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Zillioux, Jacqueline Pike, C William Sharma, Devang Rapp, David E Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty? |
title | Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty? |
title_full | Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty? |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty? |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty? |
title_short | Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty? |
title_sort | analysis of online urologist ratings: are rating differences associated with subspecialty? |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7786750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33457546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373520951901 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zilliouxjacqueline analysisofonlineurologistratingsareratingdifferencesassociatedwithsubspecialty AT pikecwilliam analysisofonlineurologistratingsareratingdifferencesassociatedwithsubspecialty AT sharmadevang analysisofonlineurologistratingsareratingdifferencesassociatedwithsubspecialty AT rappdavide analysisofonlineurologistratingsareratingdifferencesassociatedwithsubspecialty |