Cargando…

The current understanding of knowledge management concepts: A critical review

Background: Higher education institutions include experts who are knowledgeable. Knowledge management facilitates institutions to enhance the capacity to collect information and knowledge and apply it to problem-solving and decision making. Through the review of related studies, we observed that the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yazdani, Shahram, Bayazidi, Snor, Mafi, Amir Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7787024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33437723
http://dx.doi.org/10.34171/mjiri.34.127
_version_ 1783632747104829440
author Yazdani, Shahram
Bayazidi, Snor
Mafi, Amir Ali
author_facet Yazdani, Shahram
Bayazidi, Snor
Mafi, Amir Ali
author_sort Yazdani, Shahram
collection PubMed
description Background: Higher education institutions include experts who are knowledgeable. Knowledge management facilitates institutions to enhance the capacity to collect information and knowledge and apply it to problem-solving and decision making. Through the review of related studies, we observed that there are multiple concepts and terms in the field of knowledge management. Thus, the complexity and variety of these concepts and definitions must be clarified. Considering the importance of clarifying these concepts for utilization by users, this study aimed to examine the concepts related to this filed. Methods: The methodology used in this study was based on the Carnwell and Daly's critical review method. An extensive search was carried out on various databases and libraries. A critical and profound review was carried out on selected articles. Many wandering concepts were found. Identified concepts were classified into seven categories based on conceptual proximity. Existing definitions and evidence in relation to extracted concepts were criticized and synthesized. The definitional attributes for them were identified and a conceptual identity card was provided for each of the concepts. Results: Thirty-seven concepts with the most relevance to the field of knowledge management were extracted. There was no clear boundary among them, and they wandered. To avoid more confusion, concepts were classified according to semantic relation. Eight categories were created; each category consisted of a mother concept and several other concepts with similarity and proximity to the meaning of the original concept. Their attributes have been identified, and finally, each of them was presented in the form of a conceptual identity card. Conclusion: Through critically reviewing the literature in this field, we were able to identify the concepts and realize their attributes. In this way, we came to a new interpretation of the concepts. At the end of the study, we concluded that some of the concepts have not been properly defined and are not properly located in the knowledge management field; also their application is uncertain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7787024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77870242021-01-11 The current understanding of knowledge management concepts: A critical review Yazdani, Shahram Bayazidi, Snor Mafi, Amir Ali Med J Islam Repub Iran Review Article Background: Higher education institutions include experts who are knowledgeable. Knowledge management facilitates institutions to enhance the capacity to collect information and knowledge and apply it to problem-solving and decision making. Through the review of related studies, we observed that there are multiple concepts and terms in the field of knowledge management. Thus, the complexity and variety of these concepts and definitions must be clarified. Considering the importance of clarifying these concepts for utilization by users, this study aimed to examine the concepts related to this filed. Methods: The methodology used in this study was based on the Carnwell and Daly's critical review method. An extensive search was carried out on various databases and libraries. A critical and profound review was carried out on selected articles. Many wandering concepts were found. Identified concepts were classified into seven categories based on conceptual proximity. Existing definitions and evidence in relation to extracted concepts were criticized and synthesized. The definitional attributes for them were identified and a conceptual identity card was provided for each of the concepts. Results: Thirty-seven concepts with the most relevance to the field of knowledge management were extracted. There was no clear boundary among them, and they wandered. To avoid more confusion, concepts were classified according to semantic relation. Eight categories were created; each category consisted of a mother concept and several other concepts with similarity and proximity to the meaning of the original concept. Their attributes have been identified, and finally, each of them was presented in the form of a conceptual identity card. Conclusion: Through critically reviewing the literature in this field, we were able to identify the concepts and realize their attributes. In this way, we came to a new interpretation of the concepts. At the end of the study, we concluded that some of the concepts have not been properly defined and are not properly located in the knowledge management field; also their application is uncertain. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2020-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7787024/ /pubmed/33437723 http://dx.doi.org/10.34171/mjiri.34.127 Text en © 2020 Iran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-ShareAlike 1.0 License (CC BY-NC-SA 1.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Review Article
Yazdani, Shahram
Bayazidi, Snor
Mafi, Amir Ali
The current understanding of knowledge management concepts: A critical review
title The current understanding of knowledge management concepts: A critical review
title_full The current understanding of knowledge management concepts: A critical review
title_fullStr The current understanding of knowledge management concepts: A critical review
title_full_unstemmed The current understanding of knowledge management concepts: A critical review
title_short The current understanding of knowledge management concepts: A critical review
title_sort current understanding of knowledge management concepts: a critical review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7787024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33437723
http://dx.doi.org/10.34171/mjiri.34.127
work_keys_str_mv AT yazdanishahram thecurrentunderstandingofknowledgemanagementconceptsacriticalreview
AT bayazidisnor thecurrentunderstandingofknowledgemanagementconceptsacriticalreview
AT mafiamirali thecurrentunderstandingofknowledgemanagementconceptsacriticalreview
AT yazdanishahram currentunderstandingofknowledgemanagementconceptsacriticalreview
AT bayazidisnor currentunderstandingofknowledgemanagementconceptsacriticalreview
AT mafiamirali currentunderstandingofknowledgemanagementconceptsacriticalreview