Cargando…
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the non‐genetically modified Penicillium funiculosum strain DP‐Lzc35
The food enzyme cellulase (4‐(1,3;1,4)‐β‐d‐glucan 4‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.4) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Penicillium funiculosum strain Lzc35 by Danisco US Inc. The cellulase is intended to be used in distilled alcohol production, baking and brewing processes. Since residual a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7787162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33437320 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6365 |
_version_ | 1783632773311889408 |
---|---|
author | Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lambré, Claude Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Engel, Karl‐Heinz Penninks, André Želježic, Davor Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Arcella, Davide Gomes, Ana Kovalkovicova, Natalia Liu, Yi Chesson, Andrew |
author_facet | Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lambré, Claude Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Engel, Karl‐Heinz Penninks, André Želježic, Davor Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Arcella, Davide Gomes, Ana Kovalkovicova, Natalia Liu, Yi Chesson, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | The food enzyme cellulase (4‐(1,3;1,4)‐β‐d‐glucan 4‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.4) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Penicillium funiculosum strain Lzc35 by Danisco US Inc. The cellulase is intended to be used in distilled alcohol production, baking and brewing processes. Since residual amounts of total organic solids (TOS) are removed by distillation, dietary exposure was only calculated for baking and brewing processes. Based on the proposed maximum use levels, dietary exposure to the food enzyme–TOS was estimated to be up to 0.416 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day. Genotoxicity tests did not raise a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 84 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, resulted in a margin of exposure of at least 200. Similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to those of known allergens was searched and no match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is considered to be low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7787162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77871622021-01-11 Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the non‐genetically modified Penicillium funiculosum strain DP‐Lzc35 Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lambré, Claude Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Engel, Karl‐Heinz Penninks, André Želježic, Davor Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Arcella, Davide Gomes, Ana Kovalkovicova, Natalia Liu, Yi Chesson, Andrew EFSA J Scientific Opinion The food enzyme cellulase (4‐(1,3;1,4)‐β‐d‐glucan 4‐glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.4) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Penicillium funiculosum strain Lzc35 by Danisco US Inc. The cellulase is intended to be used in distilled alcohol production, baking and brewing processes. Since residual amounts of total organic solids (TOS) are removed by distillation, dietary exposure was only calculated for baking and brewing processes. Based on the proposed maximum use levels, dietary exposure to the food enzyme–TOS was estimated to be up to 0.416 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day. Genotoxicity tests did not raise a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90‐day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 84 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, resulted in a margin of exposure of at least 200. Similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to those of known allergens was searched and no match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is considered to be low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7787162/ /pubmed/33437320 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6365 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Silano, Vittorio Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lambré, Claude Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Engel, Karl‐Heinz Penninks, André Želježic, Davor Andryszkiewicz, Magdalena Arcella, Davide Gomes, Ana Kovalkovicova, Natalia Liu, Yi Chesson, Andrew Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the non‐genetically modified Penicillium funiculosum strain DP‐Lzc35 |
title | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the non‐genetically modified Penicillium funiculosum strain DP‐Lzc35 |
title_full | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the non‐genetically modified Penicillium funiculosum strain DP‐Lzc35 |
title_fullStr | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the non‐genetically modified Penicillium funiculosum strain DP‐Lzc35 |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the non‐genetically modified Penicillium funiculosum strain DP‐Lzc35 |
title_short | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the non‐genetically modified Penicillium funiculosum strain DP‐Lzc35 |
title_sort | safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulase from the non‐genetically modified penicillium funiculosum strain dp‐lzc35 |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7787162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33437320 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6365 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT silanovittorio safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT bolognesiclaudia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT crebelliriccardo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT gottdavidmichael safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT grobkonrad safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT lambreclaude safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT lampievgenia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT mengelersmarcel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT mortensenalicja safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT rivieregilles safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT steffenseningerlise safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT tlustoschristina safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT vanloverenhenk safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT vernislaurence safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT zornholger safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT glandorfboet safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT engelkarlheinz safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT penninksandre safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT zeljezicdavor safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT andryszkiewiczmagdalena safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT arcelladavide safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT gomesana safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT kovalkovicovanatalia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT liuyi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 AT chessonandrew safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymecellulasefromthenongeneticallymodifiedpenicilliumfuniculosumstraindplzc35 |