Cargando…

The effectiveness and prognostic factors of radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation for the treatment of cervical lymph node recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after external beam radiation therapy

PURPOSE: To analyze factors influencing the efficacy of (125)I seed implantation in the treatment of in-field cervical lymph node recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after external beam radiation therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 36 patients wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yuwei, Liu, Zezhou, Liang, Yansong, Chen, Enli, Zhang, Hongtao, Gao, Zhen, Wang, Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7787212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33437306
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2020.101691
_version_ 1783632780811304960
author Zhang, Yuwei
Liu, Zezhou
Liang, Yansong
Chen, Enli
Zhang, Hongtao
Gao, Zhen
Wang, Juan
author_facet Zhang, Yuwei
Liu, Zezhou
Liang, Yansong
Chen, Enli
Zhang, Hongtao
Gao, Zhen
Wang, Juan
author_sort Zhang, Yuwei
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To analyze factors influencing the efficacy of (125)I seed implantation in the treatment of in-field cervical lymph node recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after external beam radiation therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 36 patients with in-field cervical metastatic lymph nodes recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CML-ESCC) after external beam radiation therapy treatment, who underwent (125)I seed implantation in our department from 2013 to 2019. Previous cumulative external irradiation dose ranged from 20 to 66 Gy (median, 60 Gy). The post-implant efficacy was evaluated by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, and an adverse event was evaluated by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Late Radiation Morbidity Score (EORTC). COX proportional hazards model was used to analyze risk factors affecting effectiveness. RESULTS: Among 36 patients, 31 patients (86.1%) received fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (1-6 cycles) after (125)I seed implantation. Local control rates at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after implantation were 51%, 30%, 30%, and 18%, respectively, with a median of 9 months (95% CI: 6.106-11.894); survival rates after 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were 55%, 41%, 22%, and 22%, respectively, with a median of 8 months (95% CI: 5.753-10.247). Multivariate analysis showed that D(90) and short-term efficacy were independent factors related to local control and survival rate (p = 0.005, < 0.001, 0.010, < 0.001). There were 2 cases (5.6%) with grade 1 skin toxicity, 1 case (2.8%) with grade 4 skin toxicity, 3 cases (8.3%) with grade 1 mucosal ulcer, and 3 cases (8.3%) with grade 1 xerostomia. CONCLUSIONS: (125)I seed implantation as an effective salvage treatment shows definite efficacy and safety for patients with in-field cervical lymph node recurrence of ESCC after external beam radiation therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7787212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77872122021-01-11 The effectiveness and prognostic factors of radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation for the treatment of cervical lymph node recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after external beam radiation therapy Zhang, Yuwei Liu, Zezhou Liang, Yansong Chen, Enli Zhang, Hongtao Gao, Zhen Wang, Juan J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: To analyze factors influencing the efficacy of (125)I seed implantation in the treatment of in-field cervical lymph node recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after external beam radiation therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 36 patients with in-field cervical metastatic lymph nodes recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CML-ESCC) after external beam radiation therapy treatment, who underwent (125)I seed implantation in our department from 2013 to 2019. Previous cumulative external irradiation dose ranged from 20 to 66 Gy (median, 60 Gy). The post-implant efficacy was evaluated by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, and an adverse event was evaluated by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Late Radiation Morbidity Score (EORTC). COX proportional hazards model was used to analyze risk factors affecting effectiveness. RESULTS: Among 36 patients, 31 patients (86.1%) received fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (1-6 cycles) after (125)I seed implantation. Local control rates at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after implantation were 51%, 30%, 30%, and 18%, respectively, with a median of 9 months (95% CI: 6.106-11.894); survival rates after 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were 55%, 41%, 22%, and 22%, respectively, with a median of 8 months (95% CI: 5.753-10.247). Multivariate analysis showed that D(90) and short-term efficacy were independent factors related to local control and survival rate (p = 0.005, < 0.001, 0.010, < 0.001). There were 2 cases (5.6%) with grade 1 skin toxicity, 1 case (2.8%) with grade 4 skin toxicity, 3 cases (8.3%) with grade 1 mucosal ulcer, and 3 cases (8.3%) with grade 1 xerostomia. CONCLUSIONS: (125)I seed implantation as an effective salvage treatment shows definite efficacy and safety for patients with in-field cervical lymph node recurrence of ESCC after external beam radiation therapy. Termedia Publishing House 2020-12-16 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7787212/ /pubmed/33437306 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2020.101691 Text en Copyright © 2020 Termedia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Paper
Zhang, Yuwei
Liu, Zezhou
Liang, Yansong
Chen, Enli
Zhang, Hongtao
Gao, Zhen
Wang, Juan
The effectiveness and prognostic factors of radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation for the treatment of cervical lymph node recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after external beam radiation therapy
title The effectiveness and prognostic factors of radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation for the treatment of cervical lymph node recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after external beam radiation therapy
title_full The effectiveness and prognostic factors of radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation for the treatment of cervical lymph node recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after external beam radiation therapy
title_fullStr The effectiveness and prognostic factors of radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation for the treatment of cervical lymph node recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after external beam radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness and prognostic factors of radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation for the treatment of cervical lymph node recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after external beam radiation therapy
title_short The effectiveness and prognostic factors of radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation for the treatment of cervical lymph node recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after external beam radiation therapy
title_sort effectiveness and prognostic factors of radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation for the treatment of cervical lymph node recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after external beam radiation therapy
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7787212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33437306
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2020.101691
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyuwei theeffectivenessandprognosticfactorsofradioactiveiodine125seedimplantationforthetreatmentofcervicallymphnoderecurrenceofesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaafterexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT liuzezhou theeffectivenessandprognosticfactorsofradioactiveiodine125seedimplantationforthetreatmentofcervicallymphnoderecurrenceofesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaafterexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT liangyansong theeffectivenessandprognosticfactorsofradioactiveiodine125seedimplantationforthetreatmentofcervicallymphnoderecurrenceofesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaafterexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT chenenli theeffectivenessandprognosticfactorsofradioactiveiodine125seedimplantationforthetreatmentofcervicallymphnoderecurrenceofesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaafterexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT zhanghongtao theeffectivenessandprognosticfactorsofradioactiveiodine125seedimplantationforthetreatmentofcervicallymphnoderecurrenceofesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaafterexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT gaozhen theeffectivenessandprognosticfactorsofradioactiveiodine125seedimplantationforthetreatmentofcervicallymphnoderecurrenceofesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaafterexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT wangjuan theeffectivenessandprognosticfactorsofradioactiveiodine125seedimplantationforthetreatmentofcervicallymphnoderecurrenceofesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaafterexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT zhangyuwei effectivenessandprognosticfactorsofradioactiveiodine125seedimplantationforthetreatmentofcervicallymphnoderecurrenceofesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaafterexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT liuzezhou effectivenessandprognosticfactorsofradioactiveiodine125seedimplantationforthetreatmentofcervicallymphnoderecurrenceofesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaafterexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT liangyansong effectivenessandprognosticfactorsofradioactiveiodine125seedimplantationforthetreatmentofcervicallymphnoderecurrenceofesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaafterexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT chenenli effectivenessandprognosticfactorsofradioactiveiodine125seedimplantationforthetreatmentofcervicallymphnoderecurrenceofesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaafterexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT zhanghongtao effectivenessandprognosticfactorsofradioactiveiodine125seedimplantationforthetreatmentofcervicallymphnoderecurrenceofesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaafterexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT gaozhen effectivenessandprognosticfactorsofradioactiveiodine125seedimplantationforthetreatmentofcervicallymphnoderecurrenceofesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaafterexternalbeamradiationtherapy
AT wangjuan effectivenessandprognosticfactorsofradioactiveiodine125seedimplantationforthetreatmentofcervicallymphnoderecurrenceofesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaafterexternalbeamradiationtherapy