Cargando…

Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft Dysfunction

BACKGROUND: Renal transplant has emerged as a preferred treatment modality in cases of end-stage renal disease; however, a small percentage of cases suffer from graft dysfunction. AIM: To evaluate the renal transplant biopsies and analyze the various causes of graft dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bashir, Shaarif, Hussain, Mudassar, Ali Khan, Azhar, Hassan, Usman, Mushtaq, Khawaja Sajid, Hameed, Maryam, Awan, Usman Ayub
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7787863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33489373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7289701
_version_ 1783632914530959360
author Bashir, Shaarif
Hussain, Mudassar
Ali Khan, Azhar
Hassan, Usman
Mushtaq, Khawaja Sajid
Hameed, Maryam
Awan, Usman Ayub
author_facet Bashir, Shaarif
Hussain, Mudassar
Ali Khan, Azhar
Hassan, Usman
Mushtaq, Khawaja Sajid
Hameed, Maryam
Awan, Usman Ayub
author_sort Bashir, Shaarif
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Renal transplant has emerged as a preferred treatment modality in cases of end-stage renal disease; however, a small percentage of cases suffer from graft dysfunction. AIM: To evaluate the renal transplant biopsies and analyze the various causes of graft dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 163 renal transplant biopsies, reported between 2014 and 2019 and who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, were evaluated with respect to demographics, clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical features. RESULTS: Of 163 patients, 26 (16%) were females and 137 (84%) were males with a mean age of 34 ± 7 years. 53 (32.5%) cases were of rejection (ABMR and TCMR), 1 (0.6%) was borderline, 15 were of IFTA, and rest of 94 cases (57.7%) belonged to the others category. SCr (serum creatinine) in cases of rejection was 3.85 ± 0.55 mg/dl. Causes of early graft dysfunction included active ABMR (7.1 ± 4.7 months), acute TCMR (5.5 months), and acute tubular necrosis (after 6 ± 2.2 months of transplant) while the causes of late rejection were CNIT and IFTA (34 ± 4.7 and 35 ± 7.8 months, respectively). CONCLUSION: Renal graft dysfunction still remains a concerning area for both clinicians and patients. Biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing the exact cause of graft dysfunction and in planning further management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7787863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77878632021-01-22 Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft Dysfunction Bashir, Shaarif Hussain, Mudassar Ali Khan, Azhar Hassan, Usman Mushtaq, Khawaja Sajid Hameed, Maryam Awan, Usman Ayub Int J Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Renal transplant has emerged as a preferred treatment modality in cases of end-stage renal disease; however, a small percentage of cases suffer from graft dysfunction. AIM: To evaluate the renal transplant biopsies and analyze the various causes of graft dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 163 renal transplant biopsies, reported between 2014 and 2019 and who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, were evaluated with respect to demographics, clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical features. RESULTS: Of 163 patients, 26 (16%) were females and 137 (84%) were males with a mean age of 34 ± 7 years. 53 (32.5%) cases were of rejection (ABMR and TCMR), 1 (0.6%) was borderline, 15 were of IFTA, and rest of 94 cases (57.7%) belonged to the others category. SCr (serum creatinine) in cases of rejection was 3.85 ± 0.55 mg/dl. Causes of early graft dysfunction included active ABMR (7.1 ± 4.7 months), acute TCMR (5.5 months), and acute tubular necrosis (after 6 ± 2.2 months of transplant) while the causes of late rejection were CNIT and IFTA (34 ± 4.7 and 35 ± 7.8 months, respectively). CONCLUSION: Renal graft dysfunction still remains a concerning area for both clinicians and patients. Biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing the exact cause of graft dysfunction and in planning further management. Hindawi 2020-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7787863/ /pubmed/33489373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7289701 Text en Copyright © 2020 Shaarif Bashir et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bashir, Shaarif
Hussain, Mudassar
Ali Khan, Azhar
Hassan, Usman
Mushtaq, Khawaja Sajid
Hameed, Maryam
Awan, Usman Ayub
Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft Dysfunction
title Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft Dysfunction
title_full Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft Dysfunction
title_fullStr Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft Dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft Dysfunction
title_short Renal Transplant Pathology: Demographic Features and Histopathological Analysis of the Causes of Graft Dysfunction
title_sort renal transplant pathology: demographic features and histopathological analysis of the causes of graft dysfunction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7787863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33489373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7289701
work_keys_str_mv AT bashirshaarif renaltransplantpathologydemographicfeaturesandhistopathologicalanalysisofthecausesofgraftdysfunction
AT hussainmudassar renaltransplantpathologydemographicfeaturesandhistopathologicalanalysisofthecausesofgraftdysfunction
AT alikhanazhar renaltransplantpathologydemographicfeaturesandhistopathologicalanalysisofthecausesofgraftdysfunction
AT hassanusman renaltransplantpathologydemographicfeaturesandhistopathologicalanalysisofthecausesofgraftdysfunction
AT mushtaqkhawajasajid renaltransplantpathologydemographicfeaturesandhistopathologicalanalysisofthecausesofgraftdysfunction
AT hameedmaryam renaltransplantpathologydemographicfeaturesandhistopathologicalanalysisofthecausesofgraftdysfunction
AT awanusmanayub renaltransplantpathologydemographicfeaturesandhistopathologicalanalysisofthecausesofgraftdysfunction