Cargando…

Pregnancy and delivery after mid-urethral sling operation

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESES: There is no consensus regarding pregnancy after mid-urethral sling (MUS) operation, and some clinicians recommend postponing the MUS operation if a woman considers further pregnancies or routinely suggest cesarean section as the delivery method after MUS operations. Our...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tulokas, Sari A., Rahkola-Soisalo, Päivi, Gissler, Mika, Mikkola, Tomi S., Mentula, Maarit J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32840660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04497-w
_version_ 1783632945296179200
author Tulokas, Sari A.
Rahkola-Soisalo, Päivi
Gissler, Mika
Mikkola, Tomi S.
Mentula, Maarit J.
author_facet Tulokas, Sari A.
Rahkola-Soisalo, Päivi
Gissler, Mika
Mikkola, Tomi S.
Mentula, Maarit J.
author_sort Tulokas, Sari A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESES: There is no consensus regarding pregnancy after mid-urethral sling (MUS) operation, and some clinicians recommend postponing the MUS operation if a woman considers further pregnancies or routinely suggest cesarean section as the delivery method after MUS operations. Our primary aim was to assess the risk for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) re-procedure after delivery in women with a MUS operation prior to pregnancy. We also analyzed SUI re-visits and MUS-related complications during pregnancy and postpartum. METHODS: We conducted a register-based case-control study of women with a MUS operation in Finland during 1996–2016. We identified 94 cases with a subsequent pregnancy and 330 controls without subsequent pregnancies matched by age, operation type and year. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 10.7 years (IQR 7.1–13.7). The number of SUI re-procedures did not differ between the cases (n = 3, 3.2%) and controls (n = 17, 5.2%; OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.2–2.1). There was no significant difference in re-visits for stress or mixed urinary incontinence between the cases (n = 23, 24.5%) and controls (n = 86, 26.1%; OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5–1.6), but 35% of the re-visits in the case group occurred already before the delivery after MUS. The rate of vaginal delivery was lower after MUS operation (57%) than in deliveries before MUS (91%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy after MUS did not increase the odds for SUI re-procedure or re-visit. Considering on our results, future pregnancy does not need to be viewed as an absolute contraindication for MUS operation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-020-04497-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7788014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77880142021-01-14 Pregnancy and delivery after mid-urethral sling operation Tulokas, Sari A. Rahkola-Soisalo, Päivi Gissler, Mika Mikkola, Tomi S. Mentula, Maarit J. Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESES: There is no consensus regarding pregnancy after mid-urethral sling (MUS) operation, and some clinicians recommend postponing the MUS operation if a woman considers further pregnancies or routinely suggest cesarean section as the delivery method after MUS operations. Our primary aim was to assess the risk for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) re-procedure after delivery in women with a MUS operation prior to pregnancy. We also analyzed SUI re-visits and MUS-related complications during pregnancy and postpartum. METHODS: We conducted a register-based case-control study of women with a MUS operation in Finland during 1996–2016. We identified 94 cases with a subsequent pregnancy and 330 controls without subsequent pregnancies matched by age, operation type and year. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 10.7 years (IQR 7.1–13.7). The number of SUI re-procedures did not differ between the cases (n = 3, 3.2%) and controls (n = 17, 5.2%; OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.2–2.1). There was no significant difference in re-visits for stress or mixed urinary incontinence between the cases (n = 23, 24.5%) and controls (n = 86, 26.1%; OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5–1.6), but 35% of the re-visits in the case group occurred already before the delivery after MUS. The rate of vaginal delivery was lower after MUS operation (57%) than in deliveries before MUS (91%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy after MUS did not increase the odds for SUI re-procedure or re-visit. Considering on our results, future pregnancy does not need to be viewed as an absolute contraindication for MUS operation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-020-04497-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-08-25 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7788014/ /pubmed/32840660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04497-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tulokas, Sari A.
Rahkola-Soisalo, Päivi
Gissler, Mika
Mikkola, Tomi S.
Mentula, Maarit J.
Pregnancy and delivery after mid-urethral sling operation
title Pregnancy and delivery after mid-urethral sling operation
title_full Pregnancy and delivery after mid-urethral sling operation
title_fullStr Pregnancy and delivery after mid-urethral sling operation
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy and delivery after mid-urethral sling operation
title_short Pregnancy and delivery after mid-urethral sling operation
title_sort pregnancy and delivery after mid-urethral sling operation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32840660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04497-w
work_keys_str_mv AT tulokassaria pregnancyanddeliveryaftermidurethralslingoperation
AT rahkolasoisalopaivi pregnancyanddeliveryaftermidurethralslingoperation
AT gisslermika pregnancyanddeliveryaftermidurethralslingoperation
AT mikkolatomis pregnancyanddeliveryaftermidurethralslingoperation
AT mentulamaaritj pregnancyanddeliveryaftermidurethralslingoperation