Cargando…

Points to consider for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: a consensus statement

OBJECTIVES: Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have been approved for use in various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. With five agents licensed, it was timely to summarise the current understanding of JAKi use based on a systematic literature review (SLR) on efficacy and safety. METHODS: Existing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nash, Peter, Kerschbaumer, Andreas, Dörner, Thomas, Dougados, Maxime, Fleischmann, Roy M, Geissler, Klaus, McInnes, Iain, Pope, Janet E, van der Heijde, Désirée, Stoffer-Marx, Michaela, Takeuchi, Tsutomu, Trauner, Michael, Winthrop, Kevin L, de Wit, Maarten, Aletaha, Daniel, Baraliakos, Xenofon, Boehncke, Wolf-Henning, Emery, Paul, Isaacs, John D, Kremer, Joel, Lee, Eun Bong, Maksymowych, Walter P, Voshaar, Marieke, Tam, Lai-Shan, Tanaka, Yoshiya, van den Bosch, Filip, Westhovens, René, Xavier, Ricardo, Smolen, Josef S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33158881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218398
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have been approved for use in various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. With five agents licensed, it was timely to summarise the current understanding of JAKi use based on a systematic literature review (SLR) on efficacy and safety. METHODS: Existing data were evaluated by a steering committee and subsequently reviewed by a 29 person expert committee leading to the formulation of a consensus statement that may assist the clinicians, patients and other stakeholders once the decision is made to commence a JAKi. The committee included patients, rheumatologists, a gastroenterologist, a haematologist, a dermatologist, an infectious disease specialist and a health professional. The SLR informed the Task Force on controlled and open clinical trials, registry data, phase 4 trials and meta-analyses. In addition, approval of new compounds by, and warnings from regulators that were issued after the end of the SLR search date were taken into consideration. RESULTS: The Task Force agreed on and developed four general principles and a total of 26 points for consideration which were grouped into six areas addressing indications, treatment dose and comedication, contraindications, pretreatment screening and risks, laboratory and clinical follow-up examinations, and adverse events. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations were determined based on the SLR and levels of agreement were voted on for every point, reaching a range between 8.8 and 9.9 on a 10-point scale. CONCLUSION: The consensus provides an assessment of evidence for efficacy and safety of an important therapeutic class with guidance on issues of practical management.