Cargando…

Employment Uncertainty and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic Initial Social Distancing Implementation: a Cross-national Study

BACKGROUND: Social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in changes in the work environment and employment uncertainty. This paper reports on a cross-national comparison of four countries (Norway, UK, USA and Australia) and examines the differences in mental health between those indiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruffolo, Mary, Price, Daicia, Schoultz, Mariyana, Leung, Janni, Bonsaksen, Tore, Thygesen, Hilde, Geirdal, Amy Østertun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33432284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40609-020-00201-4
_version_ 1783632978047401984
author Ruffolo, Mary
Price, Daicia
Schoultz, Mariyana
Leung, Janni
Bonsaksen, Tore
Thygesen, Hilde
Geirdal, Amy Østertun
author_facet Ruffolo, Mary
Price, Daicia
Schoultz, Mariyana
Leung, Janni
Bonsaksen, Tore
Thygesen, Hilde
Geirdal, Amy Østertun
author_sort Ruffolo, Mary
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in changes in the work environment and employment uncertainty. This paper reports on a cross-national comparison of four countries (Norway, UK, USA and Australia) and examines the differences in mental health between those individuals employed and those not employed during the social distancing implementation. METHODS: Participants (N = 3,810) were recruited through social media in April/May 2020 and were invited to complete a self-administered electronic survey over a 3-week period. Differences between those employed and those not employed with regard to their sociodemographic characteristics and mental health were investigated with chi-square tests, independent t tests, and one-way analysis of variances (ANOVAs). RESULTS: Compared with their counterparts, participants who were employed reported lower levels of mental health distress (p < 0.001), higher levels of psychosocial well-being (p < 0.001), better overall quality of life (p < 0.001), and lower levels of overall loneliness, social loneliness, and emotional loneliness (p < 0.001). Small to medium but consistent differences (Cohen’s d = 0.23–0.67) in mental health favor those with employment or those who were retired. CONCLUSION: Further study is needed to assess mental health over time as the COVID-19 pandemic and employment uncertainty continues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7788173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77881732021-01-07 Employment Uncertainty and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic Initial Social Distancing Implementation: a Cross-national Study Ruffolo, Mary Price, Daicia Schoultz, Mariyana Leung, Janni Bonsaksen, Tore Thygesen, Hilde Geirdal, Amy Østertun Glob Soc Welf Article BACKGROUND: Social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in changes in the work environment and employment uncertainty. This paper reports on a cross-national comparison of four countries (Norway, UK, USA and Australia) and examines the differences in mental health between those individuals employed and those not employed during the social distancing implementation. METHODS: Participants (N = 3,810) were recruited through social media in April/May 2020 and were invited to complete a self-administered electronic survey over a 3-week period. Differences between those employed and those not employed with regard to their sociodemographic characteristics and mental health were investigated with chi-square tests, independent t tests, and one-way analysis of variances (ANOVAs). RESULTS: Compared with their counterparts, participants who were employed reported lower levels of mental health distress (p < 0.001), higher levels of psychosocial well-being (p < 0.001), better overall quality of life (p < 0.001), and lower levels of overall loneliness, social loneliness, and emotional loneliness (p < 0.001). Small to medium but consistent differences (Cohen’s d = 0.23–0.67) in mental health favor those with employment or those who were retired. CONCLUSION: Further study is needed to assess mental health over time as the COVID-19 pandemic and employment uncertainty continues. Springer International Publishing 2021-01-07 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7788173/ /pubmed/33432284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40609-020-00201-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ruffolo, Mary
Price, Daicia
Schoultz, Mariyana
Leung, Janni
Bonsaksen, Tore
Thygesen, Hilde
Geirdal, Amy Østertun
Employment Uncertainty and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic Initial Social Distancing Implementation: a Cross-national Study
title Employment Uncertainty and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic Initial Social Distancing Implementation: a Cross-national Study
title_full Employment Uncertainty and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic Initial Social Distancing Implementation: a Cross-national Study
title_fullStr Employment Uncertainty and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic Initial Social Distancing Implementation: a Cross-national Study
title_full_unstemmed Employment Uncertainty and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic Initial Social Distancing Implementation: a Cross-national Study
title_short Employment Uncertainty and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic Initial Social Distancing Implementation: a Cross-national Study
title_sort employment uncertainty and mental health during the covid-19 pandemic initial social distancing implementation: a cross-national study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33432284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40609-020-00201-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ruffolomary employmentuncertaintyandmentalhealthduringthecovid19pandemicinitialsocialdistancingimplementationacrossnationalstudy
AT pricedaicia employmentuncertaintyandmentalhealthduringthecovid19pandemicinitialsocialdistancingimplementationacrossnationalstudy
AT schoultzmariyana employmentuncertaintyandmentalhealthduringthecovid19pandemicinitialsocialdistancingimplementationacrossnationalstudy
AT leungjanni employmentuncertaintyandmentalhealthduringthecovid19pandemicinitialsocialdistancingimplementationacrossnationalstudy
AT bonsaksentore employmentuncertaintyandmentalhealthduringthecovid19pandemicinitialsocialdistancingimplementationacrossnationalstudy
AT thygesenhilde employmentuncertaintyandmentalhealthduringthecovid19pandemicinitialsocialdistancingimplementationacrossnationalstudy
AT geirdalamyøstertun employmentuncertaintyandmentalhealthduringthecovid19pandemicinitialsocialdistancingimplementationacrossnationalstudy