Cargando…

Prehospital clinical signs are a poor predictor of raised intracranial pressure following traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND: For the prehospital diagnosis of raised intracranial pressure (ICP), clinicians are reliant on clinical signs such as the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), pupillary response and/or Cushing’s triad (hypertension, bradycardia and an irregular breathing pattern). This study aimed to explore the di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ter Avest, Ewoud, Taylor, Sam, Wilson, Mark, Lyon, Richard L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209635
_version_ 1783632979737706496
author ter Avest, Ewoud
Taylor, Sam
Wilson, Mark
Lyon, Richard L
author_facet ter Avest, Ewoud
Taylor, Sam
Wilson, Mark
Lyon, Richard L
author_sort ter Avest, Ewoud
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For the prehospital diagnosis of raised intracranial pressure (ICP), clinicians are reliant on clinical signs such as the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), pupillary response and/or Cushing’s triad (hypertension, bradycardia and an irregular breathing pattern). This study aimed to explore the diagnostic accuracy of these signs as indicators of a raised ICP. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients attended by a Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (Air Ambulance Kent, Surrey Sussex), who had sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI), requiring prehospital anaesthesia between 1 January 2016 and 1 January 2018. We established optimal cut-off values for clinical signs to identify patients with a raised ICP and investigated diagnostic accuracy for combinations of these values. RESULTS: Outcome data for 249 patients with TBI were available, of which 87 (35%) had a raised ICP. Optimal cut-off points for systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR) and pupil diameter to discriminate patients with a raised ICP were, respectively, >160 mm Hg,<60 bpm and >5 mm. Cushing criteria (SBP >160 mm Hg and HR <60 bpm) and pupillary response and size were complimentary in their ability to detect patients with a raised ICP. The presence of a fixed blown pupil or a Cushing’s response had a specificity of 93.2 (88.2–96.6)%, and a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 5.4 (2.9–10.2), whereas sensitivity and LR− were only 36.8 (26.7–47.8)% and 0.7 (0.6–0.8), respectively, (Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0.65 (0.57–0.73)). Sensitivity analysis revealed that optimal cut-off values and resultant accuracy were dependent on injury pattern. CONCLUSION: Traditional clinical signs of raised ICP may under triage patients to prehospital treatment with hyperosmolar drugs. Further research should identify more accurate clinical signs or alternative non-invasive diagnostic aids in the prehospital environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7788182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77881822021-01-14 Prehospital clinical signs are a poor predictor of raised intracranial pressure following traumatic brain injury ter Avest, Ewoud Taylor, Sam Wilson, Mark Lyon, Richard L Emerg Med J Original Research BACKGROUND: For the prehospital diagnosis of raised intracranial pressure (ICP), clinicians are reliant on clinical signs such as the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), pupillary response and/or Cushing’s triad (hypertension, bradycardia and an irregular breathing pattern). This study aimed to explore the diagnostic accuracy of these signs as indicators of a raised ICP. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients attended by a Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (Air Ambulance Kent, Surrey Sussex), who had sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI), requiring prehospital anaesthesia between 1 January 2016 and 1 January 2018. We established optimal cut-off values for clinical signs to identify patients with a raised ICP and investigated diagnostic accuracy for combinations of these values. RESULTS: Outcome data for 249 patients with TBI were available, of which 87 (35%) had a raised ICP. Optimal cut-off points for systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR) and pupil diameter to discriminate patients with a raised ICP were, respectively, >160 mm Hg,<60 bpm and >5 mm. Cushing criteria (SBP >160 mm Hg and HR <60 bpm) and pupillary response and size were complimentary in their ability to detect patients with a raised ICP. The presence of a fixed blown pupil or a Cushing’s response had a specificity of 93.2 (88.2–96.6)%, and a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 5.4 (2.9–10.2), whereas sensitivity and LR− were only 36.8 (26.7–47.8)% and 0.7 (0.6–0.8), respectively, (Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0.65 (0.57–0.73)). Sensitivity analysis revealed that optimal cut-off values and resultant accuracy were dependent on injury pattern. CONCLUSION: Traditional clinical signs of raised ICP may under triage patients to prehospital treatment with hyperosmolar drugs. Further research should identify more accurate clinical signs or alternative non-invasive diagnostic aids in the prehospital environment. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-01 2020-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7788182/ /pubmed/32948620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209635 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
ter Avest, Ewoud
Taylor, Sam
Wilson, Mark
Lyon, Richard L
Prehospital clinical signs are a poor predictor of raised intracranial pressure following traumatic brain injury
title Prehospital clinical signs are a poor predictor of raised intracranial pressure following traumatic brain injury
title_full Prehospital clinical signs are a poor predictor of raised intracranial pressure following traumatic brain injury
title_fullStr Prehospital clinical signs are a poor predictor of raised intracranial pressure following traumatic brain injury
title_full_unstemmed Prehospital clinical signs are a poor predictor of raised intracranial pressure following traumatic brain injury
title_short Prehospital clinical signs are a poor predictor of raised intracranial pressure following traumatic brain injury
title_sort prehospital clinical signs are a poor predictor of raised intracranial pressure following traumatic brain injury
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32948620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209635
work_keys_str_mv AT teravestewoud prehospitalclinicalsignsareapoorpredictorofraisedintracranialpressurefollowingtraumaticbraininjury
AT taylorsam prehospitalclinicalsignsareapoorpredictorofraisedintracranialpressurefollowingtraumaticbraininjury
AT wilsonmark prehospitalclinicalsignsareapoorpredictorofraisedintracranialpressurefollowingtraumaticbraininjury
AT lyonrichardl prehospitalclinicalsignsareapoorpredictorofraisedintracranialpressurefollowingtraumaticbraininjury