Cargando…

Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term efficacy of arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) by comparing it with diagnostic arthroscopy (primary comparison), a placebo surgical intervention, and with a non-operative alternative, exercise therapy (secondary comparison). METHODS: We conducted a multi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paavola, Mika, Kanto, Kari, Ranstam, Jonas, Malmivaara, Antti, Inkinen, Jari, Kalske, Juha, Savolainen, Vesa, Sinisaari, Ilkka, Taimela, Simo, Järvinen, Teppo L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33020137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102216
_version_ 1783632984260214784
author Paavola, Mika
Kanto, Kari
Ranstam, Jonas
Malmivaara, Antti
Inkinen, Jari
Kalske, Juha
Savolainen, Vesa
Sinisaari, Ilkka
Taimela, Simo
Järvinen, Teppo L
author_facet Paavola, Mika
Kanto, Kari
Ranstam, Jonas
Malmivaara, Antti
Inkinen, Jari
Kalske, Juha
Savolainen, Vesa
Sinisaari, Ilkka
Taimela, Simo
Järvinen, Teppo L
author_sort Paavola, Mika
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term efficacy of arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) by comparing it with diagnostic arthroscopy (primary comparison), a placebo surgical intervention, and with a non-operative alternative, exercise therapy (secondary comparison). METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, three group, randomised, controlled superiority trial. We included 210 patients aged 35–65 years, who had symptoms consistent with shoulder impingement syndrome for more than 3 months. 175 participants (83%) completed the 5 years follow-up. Patient enrolment began on 1 February 2005 and the 5-year follow-up was completed by 10 October 2018. The two primary outcomes were shoulder pain at rest and on arm activity measured with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Minimally important difference (MID) was set at 15. We used a mixed-model repeated measurements analysis of variance with participant as a random factor, the baseline value as a covariate and assuming a covariance structure with compound symmetry. RESULTS: In the primary intention to treat analysis (ASD vs diagnostic arthroscopy), there were no between-group differences that exceeded the MID for the primary outcomes at 5 years: the mean difference between groups (ASD minus diagnostic arthroscopy) in pain VAS were −2.0 (95% CI −8.5 to 4.6; p=0.56) at rest and −8.0 (−17.3 to 1.3; p=0.093) on arm activity. There were no between-group differences in the secondary outcomes or adverse events that exceeded the MID. In our secondary comparison (ASD vs exercise therapy), the mean differences between groups (ASD minus exercise therapy) in pain VAS were 1.0 (−5.6 to 7.6; p=0.77) at rest and −3.9 (−12.8 to 5.1; p=0.40) on arm activity. There were no significant between-group differences for the secondary outcomes or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: ASD provided no benefit over diagnostic arthroscopy (or exercise therapy) at 5 years for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7788208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77882082021-01-14 Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial Paavola, Mika Kanto, Kari Ranstam, Jonas Malmivaara, Antti Inkinen, Jari Kalske, Juha Savolainen, Vesa Sinisaari, Ilkka Taimela, Simo Järvinen, Teppo L Br J Sports Med Original Research OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term efficacy of arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) by comparing it with diagnostic arthroscopy (primary comparison), a placebo surgical intervention, and with a non-operative alternative, exercise therapy (secondary comparison). METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, three group, randomised, controlled superiority trial. We included 210 patients aged 35–65 years, who had symptoms consistent with shoulder impingement syndrome for more than 3 months. 175 participants (83%) completed the 5 years follow-up. Patient enrolment began on 1 February 2005 and the 5-year follow-up was completed by 10 October 2018. The two primary outcomes were shoulder pain at rest and on arm activity measured with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Minimally important difference (MID) was set at 15. We used a mixed-model repeated measurements analysis of variance with participant as a random factor, the baseline value as a covariate and assuming a covariance structure with compound symmetry. RESULTS: In the primary intention to treat analysis (ASD vs diagnostic arthroscopy), there were no between-group differences that exceeded the MID for the primary outcomes at 5 years: the mean difference between groups (ASD minus diagnostic arthroscopy) in pain VAS were −2.0 (95% CI −8.5 to 4.6; p=0.56) at rest and −8.0 (−17.3 to 1.3; p=0.093) on arm activity. There were no between-group differences in the secondary outcomes or adverse events that exceeded the MID. In our secondary comparison (ASD vs exercise therapy), the mean differences between groups (ASD minus exercise therapy) in pain VAS were 1.0 (−5.6 to 7.6; p=0.77) at rest and −3.9 (−12.8 to 5.1; p=0.40) on arm activity. There were no significant between-group differences for the secondary outcomes or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: ASD provided no benefit over diagnostic arthroscopy (or exercise therapy) at 5 years for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-01 2020-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7788208/ /pubmed/33020137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102216 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Paavola, Mika
Kanto, Kari
Ranstam, Jonas
Malmivaara, Antti
Inkinen, Jari
Kalske, Juha
Savolainen, Vesa
Sinisaari, Ilkka
Taimela, Simo
Järvinen, Teppo L
Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial
title Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial
title_full Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial
title_short Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial
title_sort subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33020137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102216
work_keys_str_mv AT paavolamika subacromialdecompressionversusdiagnosticarthroscopyforshoulderimpingementa5yearfollowupofarandomisedplacebosurgerycontrolledclinicaltrial
AT kantokari subacromialdecompressionversusdiagnosticarthroscopyforshoulderimpingementa5yearfollowupofarandomisedplacebosurgerycontrolledclinicaltrial
AT ranstamjonas subacromialdecompressionversusdiagnosticarthroscopyforshoulderimpingementa5yearfollowupofarandomisedplacebosurgerycontrolledclinicaltrial
AT malmivaaraantti subacromialdecompressionversusdiagnosticarthroscopyforshoulderimpingementa5yearfollowupofarandomisedplacebosurgerycontrolledclinicaltrial
AT inkinenjari subacromialdecompressionversusdiagnosticarthroscopyforshoulderimpingementa5yearfollowupofarandomisedplacebosurgerycontrolledclinicaltrial
AT kalskejuha subacromialdecompressionversusdiagnosticarthroscopyforshoulderimpingementa5yearfollowupofarandomisedplacebosurgerycontrolledclinicaltrial
AT savolainenvesa subacromialdecompressionversusdiagnosticarthroscopyforshoulderimpingementa5yearfollowupofarandomisedplacebosurgerycontrolledclinicaltrial
AT sinisaariilkka subacromialdecompressionversusdiagnosticarthroscopyforshoulderimpingementa5yearfollowupofarandomisedplacebosurgerycontrolledclinicaltrial
AT taimelasimo subacromialdecompressionversusdiagnosticarthroscopyforshoulderimpingementa5yearfollowupofarandomisedplacebosurgerycontrolledclinicaltrial
AT jarvinenteppol subacromialdecompressionversusdiagnosticarthroscopyforshoulderimpingementa5yearfollowupofarandomisedplacebosurgerycontrolledclinicaltrial
AT subacromialdecompressionversusdiagnosticarthroscopyforshoulderimpingementa5yearfollowupofarandomisedplacebosurgerycontrolledclinicaltrial