Cargando…

Discriminatory performance of insulin-like growth factor 1 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 by correlating values to chronological age, bone age, and pubertal status for diagnosis of isolated growth hormone deficiency

PURPOSE: The discriminatory performance of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) was investigated by correlating their values with chronological age (CA), bone age (BA), and pubertal status (PS) for diagnosis of isolated growth hormone defici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Yu jung, Lee, Yoon Ji, Lee, Na Yeong, Lee, Seon-Hwa, Kim, Seul-Ki, Ahn, Moon-Bae, Kim, Shin-Hee, Cho, Won-Kyoung, Cho, Kyoung-Soon, Jung, Min Ho, Suh, Byung-Kyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Pediatric Endocrinology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32871649
http://dx.doi.org/10.6065/apem.2040018.009
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The discriminatory performance of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) was investigated by correlating their values with chronological age (CA), bone age (BA), and pubertal status (PS) for diagnosis of isolated growth hormone deficiency (IGHD). METHODS: We evaluated IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels in 310 short-stature subjects subdivided into 2 groups: IGHD (n=31) and non-IGHD (n=279). IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 were assayed using immune-radiometric assay and transformed into standard deviation score (SDS) according to CA, BA, and PS. RESULTS: The highest sensitivity was found in IGF-1-SDS for CA and IGFBP-3-SDS for CA (22.6% and 30.0%, respectively). The highest specificity was found in IGF-1-SDS for PS and IGFBP-3-SDS for PS (98.2% and 94.4%, respectively). Groups with the highest positive predictive values were IGF-1-SDS for BA and IGFBP-3-SDS for BA (10.9% and 5.1%, respectively). Highest negative predictive values were seen in IGF-1-SDS for CA and IGFBP-3-SDS for CA (98.4% and 98.4%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: IGF-1-SDS for CA, instead of IGF-1-SDS for BA or PS, could be used as a standard variable for IGHD screening. The sufficiently high specificity of IGF-1-SDS for PS suggests that this value is a useful tool for identification of IGHD.