Cargando…

Risk Factors and Options of Management for an Incidental Dural Tear in Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN: Here we perform a retrospective analysis regarding an incidental dural tear (IDT) during biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS). PURPOSE: This study investigates the causes of IDT specifically related to technical procedures of BESS with the aim of lowering its risk during training....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Ju-Eun, Choi, Dae-Jung, Park, Eugene J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429015
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0297
_version_ 1783633019332984832
author Kim, Ju-Eun
Choi, Dae-Jung
Park, Eugene J.
author_facet Kim, Ju-Eun
Choi, Dae-Jung
Park, Eugene J.
author_sort Kim, Ju-Eun
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Here we perform a retrospective analysis regarding an incidental dural tear (IDT) during biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS). PURPOSE: This study investigates the causes of IDT specifically related to technical procedures of BESS with the aim of lowering its risk during training. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The incidence of dural tear is reported 0.5%–18% in open spinal surgery and 1.7%–4.3% during endoscopic spinal surgery. Because conversion to open surgery for direct repair could become necessary during endoscopic spinal surgery, prevention of this complication is essential. METHODS: We have retrospectively studied IDTs by four surgeons during 1 or 2 years after starting BESS for lumbar degenerative diseases and analyzed the locations, sizes, and specific endoscopic conditions specific to each. RESULTS: Twenty-five cases (1.6%) of IDTs among 1,551 cases of BESS occurred; 13 cases (52%) of these were within the first 6 months. The locations were dorsal midline in 12 cases, ipsilateral side in 11 cases, and contralateral side in two cases. The tear sizes were <10 mm in 20 cases and ≥10 mm in five cases. IDT commonly occurred due to injury of central dural folding during flavectomy under turbid surgical fields due to small bleeds under water. Twenty cases with IDTs of <10 mm were treated well with the patch technique. Among five cases of ≥10 mm, three underwent open repair within a few days, and two of these which failed to conservative management required a delayed revision operation due to pseudomeningocele. No cases progressed to surgical site infection or infectious spondylitis. CONCLUSIONS: IDTs of <10 mm can be successfully treated with the patch technique. To prevent IDT during the early learning period, maintaining clear visibility by securing fluent saline outflow and meticulous hemostasis of small bleeding from exposed cancellous bone and epidural vessels is essential with caution not to injure the central dural folding during midline flavectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7788375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77883752021-01-15 Risk Factors and Options of Management for an Incidental Dural Tear in Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery Kim, Ju-Eun Choi, Dae-Jung Park, Eugene J. Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Here we perform a retrospective analysis regarding an incidental dural tear (IDT) during biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS). PURPOSE: This study investigates the causes of IDT specifically related to technical procedures of BESS with the aim of lowering its risk during training. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The incidence of dural tear is reported 0.5%–18% in open spinal surgery and 1.7%–4.3% during endoscopic spinal surgery. Because conversion to open surgery for direct repair could become necessary during endoscopic spinal surgery, prevention of this complication is essential. METHODS: We have retrospectively studied IDTs by four surgeons during 1 or 2 years after starting BESS for lumbar degenerative diseases and analyzed the locations, sizes, and specific endoscopic conditions specific to each. RESULTS: Twenty-five cases (1.6%) of IDTs among 1,551 cases of BESS occurred; 13 cases (52%) of these were within the first 6 months. The locations were dorsal midline in 12 cases, ipsilateral side in 11 cases, and contralateral side in two cases. The tear sizes were <10 mm in 20 cases and ≥10 mm in five cases. IDT commonly occurred due to injury of central dural folding during flavectomy under turbid surgical fields due to small bleeds under water. Twenty cases with IDTs of <10 mm were treated well with the patch technique. Among five cases of ≥10 mm, three underwent open repair within a few days, and two of these which failed to conservative management required a delayed revision operation due to pseudomeningocele. No cases progressed to surgical site infection or infectious spondylitis. CONCLUSIONS: IDTs of <10 mm can be successfully treated with the patch technique. To prevent IDT during the early learning period, maintaining clear visibility by securing fluent saline outflow and meticulous hemostasis of small bleeding from exposed cancellous bone and epidural vessels is essential with caution not to injure the central dural folding during midline flavectomy. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2020-12 2020-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7788375/ /pubmed/32429015 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0297 Text en Copyright © 2020 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Kim, Ju-Eun
Choi, Dae-Jung
Park, Eugene J.
Risk Factors and Options of Management for an Incidental Dural Tear in Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery
title Risk Factors and Options of Management for an Incidental Dural Tear in Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery
title_full Risk Factors and Options of Management for an Incidental Dural Tear in Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery
title_fullStr Risk Factors and Options of Management for an Incidental Dural Tear in Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Risk Factors and Options of Management for an Incidental Dural Tear in Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery
title_short Risk Factors and Options of Management for an Incidental Dural Tear in Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery
title_sort risk factors and options of management for an incidental dural tear in biportal endoscopic spine surgery
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429015
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0297
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjueun riskfactorsandoptionsofmanagementforanincidentalduraltearinbiportalendoscopicspinesurgery
AT choidaejung riskfactorsandoptionsofmanagementforanincidentalduraltearinbiportalendoscopicspinesurgery
AT parkeugenej riskfactorsandoptionsofmanagementforanincidentalduraltearinbiportalendoscopicspinesurgery