Cargando…

Feasibility of the Far Lateral Suboccipital Approach to the Retroodontoid Region. How Much Bone Removal Is Truly Needed?

OBJECTIVE: The posterolateral extradural suboccipital approach can be used to reach the anterior epidural space and the retro-odontoid regions. The extent of necessary bone removal of the atlas vertebra (C1) has not yet been defined. We studied the changes in the size of the horizontal and vertical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bodon, Gergely, Kiraly, Kristof, Ruttkay, Tamas, Hirt, Bernhard, Koller, Heiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33401871
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040304.152
_version_ 1783633025061355520
author Bodon, Gergely
Kiraly, Kristof
Ruttkay, Tamas
Hirt, Bernhard
Koller, Heiko
author_facet Bodon, Gergely
Kiraly, Kristof
Ruttkay, Tamas
Hirt, Bernhard
Koller, Heiko
author_sort Bodon, Gergely
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The posterolateral extradural suboccipital approach can be used to reach the anterior epidural space and the retro-odontoid regions. The extent of necessary bone removal of the atlas vertebra (C1) has not yet been defined. We studied the changes in the size of the horizontal and vertical surgical windows using stepwise bone removal of C1. A representative case is shown. METHODS: The anatomical study was performed bilaterally on five Thiel-fixed human cadavers (mean age, 83.7 years). The surgical window (horizontal × vertical) required to access the retro-odontoid region via a posterolateral approach was measured for an intact C1 posterior arch, after a semicircular inferior partial resection of the C1 arch, after resection of the unilateral hemiarch of C1, and finally after drilling approximately 3 mm from the medial aspect of the lateral mass of C1. RESULTS: The intact C1 resulted in a very narrow surgical window of 6.3 mm × 9.7 mm (horizontal × vertical). The vertical window increased to a 13 mm after the semicircular inferior partial resection of the C1 arch and to 17.3 mm in the case of removal of the ipsilateral C1 posterior arch. The bone removal from the medial aspect of the C1 lateral mass resulted in a widening of the horizontal surgical window to 10.3 mm. The final size of the surgical window was 10.3 mm × 17.3 mm. The patient with severe kyphoscoliosis of the craniocervical spine was successfully operated on using odontoid and C1–2 facet osteotomies. CONCLUSION: If only the anterior epidural space or the base of the odontoid needs to be reached, the semicircular inferior partial resection of the C1 arch allows for an adequate surgical window. The tip of the odontoid could only be reached if the ipsilateral posterior arch is resected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7788401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77884012021-01-15 Feasibility of the Far Lateral Suboccipital Approach to the Retroodontoid Region. How Much Bone Removal Is Truly Needed? Bodon, Gergely Kiraly, Kristof Ruttkay, Tamas Hirt, Bernhard Koller, Heiko Neurospine Original Article OBJECTIVE: The posterolateral extradural suboccipital approach can be used to reach the anterior epidural space and the retro-odontoid regions. The extent of necessary bone removal of the atlas vertebra (C1) has not yet been defined. We studied the changes in the size of the horizontal and vertical surgical windows using stepwise bone removal of C1. A representative case is shown. METHODS: The anatomical study was performed bilaterally on five Thiel-fixed human cadavers (mean age, 83.7 years). The surgical window (horizontal × vertical) required to access the retro-odontoid region via a posterolateral approach was measured for an intact C1 posterior arch, after a semicircular inferior partial resection of the C1 arch, after resection of the unilateral hemiarch of C1, and finally after drilling approximately 3 mm from the medial aspect of the lateral mass of C1. RESULTS: The intact C1 resulted in a very narrow surgical window of 6.3 mm × 9.7 mm (horizontal × vertical). The vertical window increased to a 13 mm after the semicircular inferior partial resection of the C1 arch and to 17.3 mm in the case of removal of the ipsilateral C1 posterior arch. The bone removal from the medial aspect of the C1 lateral mass resulted in a widening of the horizontal surgical window to 10.3 mm. The final size of the surgical window was 10.3 mm × 17.3 mm. The patient with severe kyphoscoliosis of the craniocervical spine was successfully operated on using odontoid and C1–2 facet osteotomies. CONCLUSION: If only the anterior epidural space or the base of the odontoid needs to be reached, the semicircular inferior partial resection of the C1 arch allows for an adequate surgical window. The tip of the odontoid could only be reached if the ipsilateral posterior arch is resected. Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2020-12 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7788401/ /pubmed/33401871 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040304.152 Text en Copyright © 2020 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bodon, Gergely
Kiraly, Kristof
Ruttkay, Tamas
Hirt, Bernhard
Koller, Heiko
Feasibility of the Far Lateral Suboccipital Approach to the Retroodontoid Region. How Much Bone Removal Is Truly Needed?
title Feasibility of the Far Lateral Suboccipital Approach to the Retroodontoid Region. How Much Bone Removal Is Truly Needed?
title_full Feasibility of the Far Lateral Suboccipital Approach to the Retroodontoid Region. How Much Bone Removal Is Truly Needed?
title_fullStr Feasibility of the Far Lateral Suboccipital Approach to the Retroodontoid Region. How Much Bone Removal Is Truly Needed?
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of the Far Lateral Suboccipital Approach to the Retroodontoid Region. How Much Bone Removal Is Truly Needed?
title_short Feasibility of the Far Lateral Suboccipital Approach to the Retroodontoid Region. How Much Bone Removal Is Truly Needed?
title_sort feasibility of the far lateral suboccipital approach to the retroodontoid region. how much bone removal is truly needed?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33401871
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040304.152
work_keys_str_mv AT bodongergely feasibilityofthefarlateralsuboccipitalapproachtotheretroodontoidregionhowmuchboneremovalistrulyneeded
AT kiralykristof feasibilityofthefarlateralsuboccipitalapproachtotheretroodontoidregionhowmuchboneremovalistrulyneeded
AT ruttkaytamas feasibilityofthefarlateralsuboccipitalapproachtotheretroodontoidregionhowmuchboneremovalistrulyneeded
AT hirtbernhard feasibilityofthefarlateralsuboccipitalapproachtotheretroodontoidregionhowmuchboneremovalistrulyneeded
AT kollerheiko feasibilityofthefarlateralsuboccipitalapproachtotheretroodontoidregionhowmuchboneremovalistrulyneeded