Cargando…
Reporting guidelines for clinical trials of artificial intelligence interventions: the SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines
BACKGROUND: The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is an area of immense interest. The high profile of ‘AI in health’ means that there are unusually strong drivers to accelerate the introduction and implementation of innovative AI interventions, which may not be supported by t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04951-6 |
_version_ | 1783633084318482432 |
---|---|
author | Ibrahim, Hussein Liu, Xiaoxuan Rivera, Samantha Cruz Moher, David Chan, An-Wen Sydes, Matthew R. Calvert, Melanie J. Denniston, Alastair K. |
author_facet | Ibrahim, Hussein Liu, Xiaoxuan Rivera, Samantha Cruz Moher, David Chan, An-Wen Sydes, Matthew R. Calvert, Melanie J. Denniston, Alastair K. |
author_sort | Ibrahim, Hussein |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is an area of immense interest. The high profile of ‘AI in health’ means that there are unusually strong drivers to accelerate the introduction and implementation of innovative AI interventions, which may not be supported by the available evidence, and for which the usual systems of appraisal may not yet be sufficient. MAIN TEXT: We are beginning to see the emergence of randomised clinical trials evaluating AI interventions in real-world settings. It is imperative that these studies are conducted and reported to the highest standards to enable effective evaluation because they will potentially be a key part of the evidence that is used when deciding whether an AI intervention is sufficiently safe and effective to be approved and commissioned. Minimum reporting guidelines for clinical trial protocols and reports have been instrumental in improving the quality of clinical trials and promoting completeness and transparency of reporting for the evaluation of new health interventions. The current guidelines—SPIRIT and CONSORT—are suited to traditional health interventions but research has revealed that they do not adequately address potential sources of bias specific to AI systems. Examples of elements that require specific reporting include algorithm version and the procedure for acquiring input data. In response, the SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines were developed by a multidisciplinary group of international experts using a consensus building methodological process. The extensions include a number of new items that should be reported in addition to the core items. Each item, where possible, was informed by challenges identified in existing studies of AI systems in health settings. CONCLUSION: The SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines provide the first international standards for clinical trials of AI systems. The guidelines are designed to ensure complete and transparent reporting of clinical trial protocols and reports involving AI interventions and have the potential to improve the quality of these clinical trials through improvements in their design and delivery. Their use will help to efficiently identify the safest and most effective AI interventions and commission them with confidence for the benefit of patients and the public. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7788716 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77887162021-01-07 Reporting guidelines for clinical trials of artificial intelligence interventions: the SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines Ibrahim, Hussein Liu, Xiaoxuan Rivera, Samantha Cruz Moher, David Chan, An-Wen Sydes, Matthew R. Calvert, Melanie J. Denniston, Alastair K. Trials Commentary BACKGROUND: The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is an area of immense interest. The high profile of ‘AI in health’ means that there are unusually strong drivers to accelerate the introduction and implementation of innovative AI interventions, which may not be supported by the available evidence, and for which the usual systems of appraisal may not yet be sufficient. MAIN TEXT: We are beginning to see the emergence of randomised clinical trials evaluating AI interventions in real-world settings. It is imperative that these studies are conducted and reported to the highest standards to enable effective evaluation because they will potentially be a key part of the evidence that is used when deciding whether an AI intervention is sufficiently safe and effective to be approved and commissioned. Minimum reporting guidelines for clinical trial protocols and reports have been instrumental in improving the quality of clinical trials and promoting completeness and transparency of reporting for the evaluation of new health interventions. The current guidelines—SPIRIT and CONSORT—are suited to traditional health interventions but research has revealed that they do not adequately address potential sources of bias specific to AI systems. Examples of elements that require specific reporting include algorithm version and the procedure for acquiring input data. In response, the SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines were developed by a multidisciplinary group of international experts using a consensus building methodological process. The extensions include a number of new items that should be reported in addition to the core items. Each item, where possible, was informed by challenges identified in existing studies of AI systems in health settings. CONCLUSION: The SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines provide the first international standards for clinical trials of AI systems. The guidelines are designed to ensure complete and transparent reporting of clinical trial protocols and reports involving AI interventions and have the potential to improve the quality of these clinical trials through improvements in their design and delivery. Their use will help to efficiently identify the safest and most effective AI interventions and commission them with confidence for the benefit of patients and the public. BioMed Central 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7788716/ /pubmed/33407780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04951-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Ibrahim, Hussein Liu, Xiaoxuan Rivera, Samantha Cruz Moher, David Chan, An-Wen Sydes, Matthew R. Calvert, Melanie J. Denniston, Alastair K. Reporting guidelines for clinical trials of artificial intelligence interventions: the SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines |
title | Reporting guidelines for clinical trials of artificial intelligence interventions: the SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines |
title_full | Reporting guidelines for clinical trials of artificial intelligence interventions: the SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines |
title_fullStr | Reporting guidelines for clinical trials of artificial intelligence interventions: the SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Reporting guidelines for clinical trials of artificial intelligence interventions: the SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines |
title_short | Reporting guidelines for clinical trials of artificial intelligence interventions: the SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines |
title_sort | reporting guidelines for clinical trials of artificial intelligence interventions: the spirit-ai and consort-ai guidelines |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04951-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ibrahimhussein reportingguidelinesforclinicaltrialsofartificialintelligenceinterventionsthespiritaiandconsortaiguidelines AT liuxiaoxuan reportingguidelinesforclinicaltrialsofartificialintelligenceinterventionsthespiritaiandconsortaiguidelines AT riverasamanthacruz reportingguidelinesforclinicaltrialsofartificialintelligenceinterventionsthespiritaiandconsortaiguidelines AT moherdavid reportingguidelinesforclinicaltrialsofartificialintelligenceinterventionsthespiritaiandconsortaiguidelines AT chananwen reportingguidelinesforclinicaltrialsofartificialintelligenceinterventionsthespiritaiandconsortaiguidelines AT sydesmatthewr reportingguidelinesforclinicaltrialsofartificialintelligenceinterventionsthespiritaiandconsortaiguidelines AT calvertmelaniej reportingguidelinesforclinicaltrialsofartificialintelligenceinterventionsthespiritaiandconsortaiguidelines AT dennistonalastairk reportingguidelinesforclinicaltrialsofartificialintelligenceinterventionsthespiritaiandconsortaiguidelines |