Cargando…

Ordinal outcome analysis improves the detection of between-hospital differences in outcome

BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in assessment of the quality of hospital care, based on outcome measures. Many quality of care comparisons rely on binary outcomes, for example mortality rates. Due to low numbers, the observed differences in outcome are partly subject to chance. We aimed to q...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ceyisakar, I. E., van Leeuwen, N., Dippel, Diederik W. J., Steyerberg, Ewout W., Lingsma, H. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01185-7
_version_ 1783633085017882624
author Ceyisakar, I. E.
van Leeuwen, N.
Dippel, Diederik W. J.
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Lingsma, H. F.
author_facet Ceyisakar, I. E.
van Leeuwen, N.
Dippel, Diederik W. J.
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Lingsma, H. F.
author_sort Ceyisakar, I. E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in assessment of the quality of hospital care, based on outcome measures. Many quality of care comparisons rely on binary outcomes, for example mortality rates. Due to low numbers, the observed differences in outcome are partly subject to chance. We aimed to quantify the gain in efficiency by ordinal instead of binary outcome analyses for hospital comparisons. We analyzed patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke as examples. METHODS: We sampled patients from two trials. We simulated ordinal and dichotomous outcomes based on the modified Rankin Scale (stroke) and Glasgow Outcome Scale (TBI) in scenarios with and without true differences between hospitals in outcome. The potential efficiency gain of ordinal outcomes, analyzed with ordinal logistic regression, compared to dichotomous outcomes, analyzed with binary logistic regression was expressed as the possible reduction in sample size while keeping the same statistical power to detect outliers. RESULTS: In the IMPACT study (9578 patients in 265 hospitals, mean number of patients per hospital = 36), the analysis of the ordinal scale rather than the dichotomized scale (‘unfavorable outcome’), allowed for up to 32% less patients in the analysis without a loss of power. In the PRACTISE trial (1657 patients in 12 hospitals, mean number of patients per hospital = 138), ordinal analysis allowed for 13% less patients. Compared to mortality, ordinal outcome analyses allowed for up to 37 to 63% less patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ordinal analyses provide the statistical power of substantially larger studies which have been analyzed with dichotomization of endpoints. We advise to exploit ordinal outcome measures for hospital comparisons, in order to increase efficiency in quality of care measurements. TRIAL REGISTRATION: We do not report the results of a health care intervention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-020-01185-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7788719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77887192021-01-07 Ordinal outcome analysis improves the detection of between-hospital differences in outcome Ceyisakar, I. E. van Leeuwen, N. Dippel, Diederik W. J. Steyerberg, Ewout W. Lingsma, H. F. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in assessment of the quality of hospital care, based on outcome measures. Many quality of care comparisons rely on binary outcomes, for example mortality rates. Due to low numbers, the observed differences in outcome are partly subject to chance. We aimed to quantify the gain in efficiency by ordinal instead of binary outcome analyses for hospital comparisons. We analyzed patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke as examples. METHODS: We sampled patients from two trials. We simulated ordinal and dichotomous outcomes based on the modified Rankin Scale (stroke) and Glasgow Outcome Scale (TBI) in scenarios with and without true differences between hospitals in outcome. The potential efficiency gain of ordinal outcomes, analyzed with ordinal logistic regression, compared to dichotomous outcomes, analyzed with binary logistic regression was expressed as the possible reduction in sample size while keeping the same statistical power to detect outliers. RESULTS: In the IMPACT study (9578 patients in 265 hospitals, mean number of patients per hospital = 36), the analysis of the ordinal scale rather than the dichotomized scale (‘unfavorable outcome’), allowed for up to 32% less patients in the analysis without a loss of power. In the PRACTISE trial (1657 patients in 12 hospitals, mean number of patients per hospital = 138), ordinal analysis allowed for 13% less patients. Compared to mortality, ordinal outcome analyses allowed for up to 37 to 63% less patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ordinal analyses provide the statistical power of substantially larger studies which have been analyzed with dichotomization of endpoints. We advise to exploit ordinal outcome measures for hospital comparisons, in order to increase efficiency in quality of care measurements. TRIAL REGISTRATION: We do not report the results of a health care intervention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-020-01185-7. BioMed Central 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7788719/ /pubmed/33407167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01185-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ceyisakar, I. E.
van Leeuwen, N.
Dippel, Diederik W. J.
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Lingsma, H. F.
Ordinal outcome analysis improves the detection of between-hospital differences in outcome
title Ordinal outcome analysis improves the detection of between-hospital differences in outcome
title_full Ordinal outcome analysis improves the detection of between-hospital differences in outcome
title_fullStr Ordinal outcome analysis improves the detection of between-hospital differences in outcome
title_full_unstemmed Ordinal outcome analysis improves the detection of between-hospital differences in outcome
title_short Ordinal outcome analysis improves the detection of between-hospital differences in outcome
title_sort ordinal outcome analysis improves the detection of between-hospital differences in outcome
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01185-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ceyisakarie ordinaloutcomeanalysisimprovesthedetectionofbetweenhospitaldifferencesinoutcome
AT vanleeuwenn ordinaloutcomeanalysisimprovesthedetectionofbetweenhospitaldifferencesinoutcome
AT dippeldiederikwj ordinaloutcomeanalysisimprovesthedetectionofbetweenhospitaldifferencesinoutcome
AT steyerbergewoutw ordinaloutcomeanalysisimprovesthedetectionofbetweenhospitaldifferencesinoutcome
AT lingsmahf ordinaloutcomeanalysisimprovesthedetectionofbetweenhospitaldifferencesinoutcome