Cargando…

Incidence and clinical impact of vertebral endplate changes after limited lumbar microdiscectomy and implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device

BACKGROUND: An annular closure device (ACD) could potentially prevent recurrent herniation by blocking larger annular defects after limited microdiscectomy (LMD). The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence of endplate changes (EPC) and outcome after LMD with additional implantation of an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kienzler, Jenny C., Rey, Sofia, Wetzel, Oliver, Atassi, Hermien, Bäbler, Sabrina, Burn, Felice, Fandino, Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-01011-3
_version_ 1783633094349160448
author Kienzler, Jenny C.
Rey, Sofia
Wetzel, Oliver
Atassi, Hermien
Bäbler, Sabrina
Burn, Felice
Fandino, Javier
author_facet Kienzler, Jenny C.
Rey, Sofia
Wetzel, Oliver
Atassi, Hermien
Bäbler, Sabrina
Burn, Felice
Fandino, Javier
author_sort Kienzler, Jenny C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An annular closure device (ACD) could potentially prevent recurrent herniation by blocking larger annular defects after limited microdiscectomy (LMD). The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence of endplate changes (EPC) and outcome after LMD with additional implantation of an ACD to prevent reherniation. METHODS: This analysis includes data from a) RCT study-arm of patients undergoing LMD with ACD implantation and b) additional patients undergoing ACD implantation at our institution. Clinical findings (VAS, ODI), radiological outcome (reherniation, implant integrity, volume of EPC) and risk factors for EPC were assessed. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients (37 men, 47 ± 11.63yo) underwent LMD and ACD implantation between 2013–2016. A total of 71 (99%) patients presented with some degree of EPC during the follow-up period (14.67 ± 4.77 months). In the multivariate regression analysis, localization of the anchor was the only significant predictor of EPC (p = 0.038). The largest EPC measured 4.2 cm(3). Reherniation was documented in 17 (24%) patients (symptomatic: n = 10; asymptomatic: n = 7). Six (8.3%) patients with symptomatic reherniation underwent rediscectomy. Implant failure was documented in 19 (26.4%) patients including anchor head breakage (n = 1, 1.3%), dislocation of the whole device (n = 5, 6.9%), and mesh dislocation into the spinal canal (n = 13, 18%). Mesh subsidence within the EPC was documented in 15 (20.8%) patients. Seven (9.7%) patients underwent explantation of the entire, or parts of the device. CONCLUSION: Clinical improvement after LMD and ACD implantation was proven in our study. High incidence and volume of EPC did not correlate with clinical outcome. The ACD might prevent disc reherniation despite implant failure rates. Mechanical friction of the polymer mesh with the endplate is most likely the cause of EPC after ACD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7788762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77887622021-01-07 Incidence and clinical impact of vertebral endplate changes after limited lumbar microdiscectomy and implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device Kienzler, Jenny C. Rey, Sofia Wetzel, Oliver Atassi, Hermien Bäbler, Sabrina Burn, Felice Fandino, Javier BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: An annular closure device (ACD) could potentially prevent recurrent herniation by blocking larger annular defects after limited microdiscectomy (LMD). The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence of endplate changes (EPC) and outcome after LMD with additional implantation of an ACD to prevent reherniation. METHODS: This analysis includes data from a) RCT study-arm of patients undergoing LMD with ACD implantation and b) additional patients undergoing ACD implantation at our institution. Clinical findings (VAS, ODI), radiological outcome (reherniation, implant integrity, volume of EPC) and risk factors for EPC were assessed. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients (37 men, 47 ± 11.63yo) underwent LMD and ACD implantation between 2013–2016. A total of 71 (99%) patients presented with some degree of EPC during the follow-up period (14.67 ± 4.77 months). In the multivariate regression analysis, localization of the anchor was the only significant predictor of EPC (p = 0.038). The largest EPC measured 4.2 cm(3). Reherniation was documented in 17 (24%) patients (symptomatic: n = 10; asymptomatic: n = 7). Six (8.3%) patients with symptomatic reherniation underwent rediscectomy. Implant failure was documented in 19 (26.4%) patients including anchor head breakage (n = 1, 1.3%), dislocation of the whole device (n = 5, 6.9%), and mesh dislocation into the spinal canal (n = 13, 18%). Mesh subsidence within the EPC was documented in 15 (20.8%) patients. Seven (9.7%) patients underwent explantation of the entire, or parts of the device. CONCLUSION: Clinical improvement after LMD and ACD implantation was proven in our study. High incidence and volume of EPC did not correlate with clinical outcome. The ACD might prevent disc reherniation despite implant failure rates. Mechanical friction of the polymer mesh with the endplate is most likely the cause of EPC after ACD. BioMed Central 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7788762/ /pubmed/33407349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-01011-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kienzler, Jenny C.
Rey, Sofia
Wetzel, Oliver
Atassi, Hermien
Bäbler, Sabrina
Burn, Felice
Fandino, Javier
Incidence and clinical impact of vertebral endplate changes after limited lumbar microdiscectomy and implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device
title Incidence and clinical impact of vertebral endplate changes after limited lumbar microdiscectomy and implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device
title_full Incidence and clinical impact of vertebral endplate changes after limited lumbar microdiscectomy and implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device
title_fullStr Incidence and clinical impact of vertebral endplate changes after limited lumbar microdiscectomy and implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device
title_full_unstemmed Incidence and clinical impact of vertebral endplate changes after limited lumbar microdiscectomy and implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device
title_short Incidence and clinical impact of vertebral endplate changes after limited lumbar microdiscectomy and implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device
title_sort incidence and clinical impact of vertebral endplate changes after limited lumbar microdiscectomy and implantation of a bone-anchored annular closure device
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-01011-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kienzlerjennyc incidenceandclinicalimpactofvertebralendplatechangesafterlimitedlumbarmicrodiscectomyandimplantationofaboneanchoredannularclosuredevice
AT reysofia incidenceandclinicalimpactofvertebralendplatechangesafterlimitedlumbarmicrodiscectomyandimplantationofaboneanchoredannularclosuredevice
AT wetzeloliver incidenceandclinicalimpactofvertebralendplatechangesafterlimitedlumbarmicrodiscectomyandimplantationofaboneanchoredannularclosuredevice
AT atassihermien incidenceandclinicalimpactofvertebralendplatechangesafterlimitedlumbarmicrodiscectomyandimplantationofaboneanchoredannularclosuredevice
AT bablersabrina incidenceandclinicalimpactofvertebralendplatechangesafterlimitedlumbarmicrodiscectomyandimplantationofaboneanchoredannularclosuredevice
AT burnfelice incidenceandclinicalimpactofvertebralendplatechangesafterlimitedlumbarmicrodiscectomyandimplantationofaboneanchoredannularclosuredevice
AT fandinojavier incidenceandclinicalimpactofvertebralendplatechangesafterlimitedlumbarmicrodiscectomyandimplantationofaboneanchoredannularclosuredevice