Cargando…
Single blinded semi-field evaluation of MAÏA(®) topical repellent ointment compared to unformulated 20% DEET against Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti in Tanzania
BACKGROUND: N,N-Diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) topical mosquito repellents are effective personal protection tools. However, DEET-based repellents tend to have low consumer acceptability because they are cosmetically unappealing. More attractive formulations are needed to encourage regular user co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03461-9 |
_version_ | 1783633106621693952 |
---|---|
author | Mbuba, Emmanuel Odufuwa, Olukayode G. Tenywa, Frank C. Philipo, Rose Tambwe, Mgeni M. Swai, Johnson K. Moore, Jason D. Moore, Sarah J. |
author_facet | Mbuba, Emmanuel Odufuwa, Olukayode G. Tenywa, Frank C. Philipo, Rose Tambwe, Mgeni M. Swai, Johnson K. Moore, Jason D. Moore, Sarah J. |
author_sort | Mbuba, Emmanuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: N,N-Diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) topical mosquito repellents are effective personal protection tools. However, DEET-based repellents tend to have low consumer acceptability because they are cosmetically unappealing. More attractive formulations are needed to encourage regular user compliance. This study evaluated the protective efficacy and protection duration of a new topical repellent ointment containing 15% DEET, MAÏA(®) compared to 20% DEET in ethanol using malaria and dengue mosquito vectors in Bagamoyo Tanzania. METHODS: Fully balanced 3 × 3 Latin square design studies were conducted in large semi-field chambers using laboratory strains of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto, Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti. Human volunteers applied either MAÏA(®) ointment, 20% DEET or ethanol to their lower limbs 6 h before the start of tests. Approximately 100 mosquitoes per strain per replicate were released inside each chamber, with 25 mosquitoes released at regular intervals during the collection period to maintain adequate biting pressure throughout the test. Volunteers recaptured mosquitoes landing on their lower limbs for 6 h over a period of 6 to 12-h post-application of repellents. Data analysis was conducted using mixed-effects logistic regression. RESULTS: The protective efficacy of MAÏA(®) and 20% DEET was not statistically different for each of the mosquito strains: 95.9% vs. 97.4% against An. gambiae (OR = 1.53 [95% CI 0.93–2.51] p = 0.091); 96.8% vs 97.2% against An. arabiensis (OR = 1.08 [95% CI 0.66–1.77] p = 0.757); 93.1% vs 94.6% against Ae. aegypti (OR = 0.76 [95% CI 0.20–2.80] p = 0.675). Average complete protection time (CPT) in minutes of MAÏA(®) and that of DEET was similar for each of the mosquito strains: 571.6 min (95% CI 558.3–584.8) vs 575.0 min (95% CI 562.1–587.9) against An. gambiae; 585.6 min (95% CI 571.4–599.8) vs 580.9 min (95% CI 571.1–590.7) against An. arabiensis; 444.1 min (95% CI 401.8–486.5) vs 436.9 min (95% CI 405.2–468.5) against Ae. aegypti. CONCLUSIONS: MAÏA(®) repellent ointment provides complete protection for 9 h against both An. gambiae and An. arabiensis, and 7 h against Ae. aegypti similar to 20% DEET (in ethanol). MAÏA(®) repellent ointment can be recommended as a tool for prevention against outdoor biting mosquitoes in tropical locations where the majority of the people spend an ample time outdoor before going to bed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7788821 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77888212021-01-07 Single blinded semi-field evaluation of MAÏA(®) topical repellent ointment compared to unformulated 20% DEET against Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti in Tanzania Mbuba, Emmanuel Odufuwa, Olukayode G. Tenywa, Frank C. Philipo, Rose Tambwe, Mgeni M. Swai, Johnson K. Moore, Jason D. Moore, Sarah J. Malar J Research BACKGROUND: N,N-Diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) topical mosquito repellents are effective personal protection tools. However, DEET-based repellents tend to have low consumer acceptability because they are cosmetically unappealing. More attractive formulations are needed to encourage regular user compliance. This study evaluated the protective efficacy and protection duration of a new topical repellent ointment containing 15% DEET, MAÏA(®) compared to 20% DEET in ethanol using malaria and dengue mosquito vectors in Bagamoyo Tanzania. METHODS: Fully balanced 3 × 3 Latin square design studies were conducted in large semi-field chambers using laboratory strains of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto, Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti. Human volunteers applied either MAÏA(®) ointment, 20% DEET or ethanol to their lower limbs 6 h before the start of tests. Approximately 100 mosquitoes per strain per replicate were released inside each chamber, with 25 mosquitoes released at regular intervals during the collection period to maintain adequate biting pressure throughout the test. Volunteers recaptured mosquitoes landing on their lower limbs for 6 h over a period of 6 to 12-h post-application of repellents. Data analysis was conducted using mixed-effects logistic regression. RESULTS: The protective efficacy of MAÏA(®) and 20% DEET was not statistically different for each of the mosquito strains: 95.9% vs. 97.4% against An. gambiae (OR = 1.53 [95% CI 0.93–2.51] p = 0.091); 96.8% vs 97.2% against An. arabiensis (OR = 1.08 [95% CI 0.66–1.77] p = 0.757); 93.1% vs 94.6% against Ae. aegypti (OR = 0.76 [95% CI 0.20–2.80] p = 0.675). Average complete protection time (CPT) in minutes of MAÏA(®) and that of DEET was similar for each of the mosquito strains: 571.6 min (95% CI 558.3–584.8) vs 575.0 min (95% CI 562.1–587.9) against An. gambiae; 585.6 min (95% CI 571.4–599.8) vs 580.9 min (95% CI 571.1–590.7) against An. arabiensis; 444.1 min (95% CI 401.8–486.5) vs 436.9 min (95% CI 405.2–468.5) against Ae. aegypti. CONCLUSIONS: MAÏA(®) repellent ointment provides complete protection for 9 h against both An. gambiae and An. arabiensis, and 7 h against Ae. aegypti similar to 20% DEET (in ethanol). MAÏA(®) repellent ointment can be recommended as a tool for prevention against outdoor biting mosquitoes in tropical locations where the majority of the people spend an ample time outdoor before going to bed. BioMed Central 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7788821/ /pubmed/33407496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03461-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Mbuba, Emmanuel Odufuwa, Olukayode G. Tenywa, Frank C. Philipo, Rose Tambwe, Mgeni M. Swai, Johnson K. Moore, Jason D. Moore, Sarah J. Single blinded semi-field evaluation of MAÏA(®) topical repellent ointment compared to unformulated 20% DEET against Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti in Tanzania |
title | Single blinded semi-field evaluation of MAÏA(®) topical repellent ointment compared to unformulated 20% DEET against Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti in Tanzania |
title_full | Single blinded semi-field evaluation of MAÏA(®) topical repellent ointment compared to unformulated 20% DEET against Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti in Tanzania |
title_fullStr | Single blinded semi-field evaluation of MAÏA(®) topical repellent ointment compared to unformulated 20% DEET against Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti in Tanzania |
title_full_unstemmed | Single blinded semi-field evaluation of MAÏA(®) topical repellent ointment compared to unformulated 20% DEET against Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti in Tanzania |
title_short | Single blinded semi-field evaluation of MAÏA(®) topical repellent ointment compared to unformulated 20% DEET against Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti in Tanzania |
title_sort | single blinded semi-field evaluation of maïa(®) topical repellent ointment compared to unformulated 20% deet against anopheles gambiae, anopheles arabiensis and aedes aegypti in tanzania |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03461-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mbubaemmanuel singleblindedsemifieldevaluationofmaiatopicalrepellentointmentcomparedtounformulated20deetagainstanophelesgambiaeanophelesarabiensisandaedesaegyptiintanzania AT odufuwaolukayodeg singleblindedsemifieldevaluationofmaiatopicalrepellentointmentcomparedtounformulated20deetagainstanophelesgambiaeanophelesarabiensisandaedesaegyptiintanzania AT tenywafrankc singleblindedsemifieldevaluationofmaiatopicalrepellentointmentcomparedtounformulated20deetagainstanophelesgambiaeanophelesarabiensisandaedesaegyptiintanzania AT philiporose singleblindedsemifieldevaluationofmaiatopicalrepellentointmentcomparedtounformulated20deetagainstanophelesgambiaeanophelesarabiensisandaedesaegyptiintanzania AT tambwemgenim singleblindedsemifieldevaluationofmaiatopicalrepellentointmentcomparedtounformulated20deetagainstanophelesgambiaeanophelesarabiensisandaedesaegyptiintanzania AT swaijohnsonk singleblindedsemifieldevaluationofmaiatopicalrepellentointmentcomparedtounformulated20deetagainstanophelesgambiaeanophelesarabiensisandaedesaegyptiintanzania AT moorejasond singleblindedsemifieldevaluationofmaiatopicalrepellentointmentcomparedtounformulated20deetagainstanophelesgambiaeanophelesarabiensisandaedesaegyptiintanzania AT mooresarahj singleblindedsemifieldevaluationofmaiatopicalrepellentointmentcomparedtounformulated20deetagainstanophelesgambiaeanophelesarabiensisandaedesaegyptiintanzania |