Cargando…
Induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using double-balloon catheter placement within 12 h versus within 12–24 h
BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using a double-balloon catheter (DBC) within 12 h versus within 12–24 h. METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 58 pregnant women at 14 + 0 weeks to 27 + 6 weeks of gestati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03513-7 |
_version_ | 1783633111656955904 |
---|---|
author | Peng, Jing Li, Ruobing Du, Shuguo Yin, Heng Li, Min Zheng, Xuan Wu, Shiyao Zhao, Yun |
author_facet | Peng, Jing Li, Ruobing Du, Shuguo Yin, Heng Li, Min Zheng, Xuan Wu, Shiyao Zhao, Yun |
author_sort | Peng, Jing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using a double-balloon catheter (DBC) within 12 h versus within 12–24 h. METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 58 pregnant women at 14 + 0 weeks to 27 + 6 weeks of gestation were enrolled as research subjects, and they underwent the intended termination of pregnancy at our birth centre from January 1, 2017, to June 31, 2019. Based on the duration of DBC, the patients were divided into two groups, namely, the DBC group within 12 h and the DBC group within 12–24 h. RESULTS: All 58 cases were successful vaginal deliveries, and no one chose to undergo caesarean section. The success rate of induction (successful abortion of the foetus and placenta without the implementation of dilation and evacuation) was higher in the DBC group within 12–24 h (96.3%, 29/31) than in the DBC group within 12 h (71.0%, 18/27) (p < 0.05). Additionally, the time from DBC removal to delivery in the DBC group within 12–24 h was significantly shorter than that in the DBC group within 12 h (3.0 h versus 17.8 h) (p < 0.05), and the degree of cervical dilation after DBC removal in the DBC group within 12–24 h was larger than that in the DBC group within 12 h (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the clinic, the placement time of DBC generally lasts for approximately 12 h. However, considering that the cervical condition is immature in the mid-trimester, properly extending the placement time of DBC to 24 h will benefit cervical ripening and reduce the chance of dilation and evacuation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7788842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77888422021-01-07 Induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using double-balloon catheter placement within 12 h versus within 12–24 h Peng, Jing Li, Ruobing Du, Shuguo Yin, Heng Li, Min Zheng, Xuan Wu, Shiyao Zhao, Yun BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using a double-balloon catheter (DBC) within 12 h versus within 12–24 h. METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 58 pregnant women at 14 + 0 weeks to 27 + 6 weeks of gestation were enrolled as research subjects, and they underwent the intended termination of pregnancy at our birth centre from January 1, 2017, to June 31, 2019. Based on the duration of DBC, the patients were divided into two groups, namely, the DBC group within 12 h and the DBC group within 12–24 h. RESULTS: All 58 cases were successful vaginal deliveries, and no one chose to undergo caesarean section. The success rate of induction (successful abortion of the foetus and placenta without the implementation of dilation and evacuation) was higher in the DBC group within 12–24 h (96.3%, 29/31) than in the DBC group within 12 h (71.0%, 18/27) (p < 0.05). Additionally, the time from DBC removal to delivery in the DBC group within 12–24 h was significantly shorter than that in the DBC group within 12 h (3.0 h versus 17.8 h) (p < 0.05), and the degree of cervical dilation after DBC removal in the DBC group within 12–24 h was larger than that in the DBC group within 12 h (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the clinic, the placement time of DBC generally lasts for approximately 12 h. However, considering that the cervical condition is immature in the mid-trimester, properly extending the placement time of DBC to 24 h will benefit cervical ripening and reduce the chance of dilation and evacuation. BioMed Central 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7788842/ /pubmed/33407258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03513-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Peng, Jing Li, Ruobing Du, Shuguo Yin, Heng Li, Min Zheng, Xuan Wu, Shiyao Zhao, Yun Induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using double-balloon catheter placement within 12 h versus within 12–24 h |
title | Induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using double-balloon catheter placement within 12 h versus within 12–24 h |
title_full | Induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using double-balloon catheter placement within 12 h versus within 12–24 h |
title_fullStr | Induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using double-balloon catheter placement within 12 h versus within 12–24 h |
title_full_unstemmed | Induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using double-balloon catheter placement within 12 h versus within 12–24 h |
title_short | Induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using double-balloon catheter placement within 12 h versus within 12–24 h |
title_sort | induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using double-balloon catheter placement within 12 h versus within 12–24 h |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03513-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pengjing inductionoflabourinmidtrimesterpregnancyusingdoubleballooncatheterplacementwithin12hversuswithin1224h AT liruobing inductionoflabourinmidtrimesterpregnancyusingdoubleballooncatheterplacementwithin12hversuswithin1224h AT dushuguo inductionoflabourinmidtrimesterpregnancyusingdoubleballooncatheterplacementwithin12hversuswithin1224h AT yinheng inductionoflabourinmidtrimesterpregnancyusingdoubleballooncatheterplacementwithin12hversuswithin1224h AT limin inductionoflabourinmidtrimesterpregnancyusingdoubleballooncatheterplacementwithin12hversuswithin1224h AT zhengxuan inductionoflabourinmidtrimesterpregnancyusingdoubleballooncatheterplacementwithin12hversuswithin1224h AT wushiyao inductionoflabourinmidtrimesterpregnancyusingdoubleballooncatheterplacementwithin12hversuswithin1224h AT zhaoyun inductionoflabourinmidtrimesterpregnancyusingdoubleballooncatheterplacementwithin12hversuswithin1224h |