Cargando…

New field wind manipulation methodology reveals adaptive responses of steppe plants to increased and reduced wind speed

BACKGROUND: Wind strongly impacts plant growth, leaf traits, biomass allocation, and stem mechanical properties. However, whether there are common whole-plant wind responses among different plant species is still unclear. We tested this null hypothesis by exposing four eudicot steppe species to thre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Shudong, Liu, Guofang, Cui, Qingguo, Huang, Zhenying, Ye, Xuehua, Cornelissen, Johannes H. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-020-00705-2
_version_ 1783633118533517312
author Zhang, Shudong
Liu, Guofang
Cui, Qingguo
Huang, Zhenying
Ye, Xuehua
Cornelissen, Johannes H. C.
author_facet Zhang, Shudong
Liu, Guofang
Cui, Qingguo
Huang, Zhenying
Ye, Xuehua
Cornelissen, Johannes H. C.
author_sort Zhang, Shudong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Wind strongly impacts plant growth, leaf traits, biomass allocation, and stem mechanical properties. However, whether there are common whole-plant wind responses among different plant species is still unclear. We tested this null hypothesis by exposing four eudicot steppe species to three different wind treatments in a field experiment: reduced wind velocity using windbreaks, ambient wind velocity, and enhanced wind velocity through a novel methodology using wind-funneling baffles. RESULTS: Across the four species, wind generally decreased plant height, projected crown area, and stepwise bifurcation ratio, and increased root length and stem base diameter. In contrast, the response patterns of shoot traits, especially mechanical properties, to wind velocity were idiosyncratic among species. There was no significant difference in total biomass among different treatments; this might be because the negative effects on heat dissipation and photosynthesis of low wind speed during hot periods, could counteract positive effects during favorable cooler periods. CONCLUSIONS: There are common wind response patterns in plant-size-related traits across different steppe species, while the response patterns in shoot traits vary among species. This indicates the species-specific ways by which plants balance growth and mechanical support facing wind stress. Our new field wind manipulation methodology was effective in altering wind speed with the intended magnitude. Especially, our field wind-funneling baffle system showed a great potential for use in future field wind velocity enhancement. Further experiments are needed to reveal how negative and positive effects play out on whole-plant performance in response to different wind regimes, which is important as ongoing global climatic changes involve big changes in wind regimes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7788872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77888722021-01-07 New field wind manipulation methodology reveals adaptive responses of steppe plants to increased and reduced wind speed Zhang, Shudong Liu, Guofang Cui, Qingguo Huang, Zhenying Ye, Xuehua Cornelissen, Johannes H. C. Plant Methods Research BACKGROUND: Wind strongly impacts plant growth, leaf traits, biomass allocation, and stem mechanical properties. However, whether there are common whole-plant wind responses among different plant species is still unclear. We tested this null hypothesis by exposing four eudicot steppe species to three different wind treatments in a field experiment: reduced wind velocity using windbreaks, ambient wind velocity, and enhanced wind velocity through a novel methodology using wind-funneling baffles. RESULTS: Across the four species, wind generally decreased plant height, projected crown area, and stepwise bifurcation ratio, and increased root length and stem base diameter. In contrast, the response patterns of shoot traits, especially mechanical properties, to wind velocity were idiosyncratic among species. There was no significant difference in total biomass among different treatments; this might be because the negative effects on heat dissipation and photosynthesis of low wind speed during hot periods, could counteract positive effects during favorable cooler periods. CONCLUSIONS: There are common wind response patterns in plant-size-related traits across different steppe species, while the response patterns in shoot traits vary among species. This indicates the species-specific ways by which plants balance growth and mechanical support facing wind stress. Our new field wind manipulation methodology was effective in altering wind speed with the intended magnitude. Especially, our field wind-funneling baffle system showed a great potential for use in future field wind velocity enhancement. Further experiments are needed to reveal how negative and positive effects play out on whole-plant performance in response to different wind regimes, which is important as ongoing global climatic changes involve big changes in wind regimes. BioMed Central 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7788872/ /pubmed/33407697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-020-00705-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhang, Shudong
Liu, Guofang
Cui, Qingguo
Huang, Zhenying
Ye, Xuehua
Cornelissen, Johannes H. C.
New field wind manipulation methodology reveals adaptive responses of steppe plants to increased and reduced wind speed
title New field wind manipulation methodology reveals adaptive responses of steppe plants to increased and reduced wind speed
title_full New field wind manipulation methodology reveals adaptive responses of steppe plants to increased and reduced wind speed
title_fullStr New field wind manipulation methodology reveals adaptive responses of steppe plants to increased and reduced wind speed
title_full_unstemmed New field wind manipulation methodology reveals adaptive responses of steppe plants to increased and reduced wind speed
title_short New field wind manipulation methodology reveals adaptive responses of steppe plants to increased and reduced wind speed
title_sort new field wind manipulation methodology reveals adaptive responses of steppe plants to increased and reduced wind speed
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7788872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13007-020-00705-2
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangshudong newfieldwindmanipulationmethodologyrevealsadaptiveresponsesofsteppeplantstoincreasedandreducedwindspeed
AT liuguofang newfieldwindmanipulationmethodologyrevealsadaptiveresponsesofsteppeplantstoincreasedandreducedwindspeed
AT cuiqingguo newfieldwindmanipulationmethodologyrevealsadaptiveresponsesofsteppeplantstoincreasedandreducedwindspeed
AT huangzhenying newfieldwindmanipulationmethodologyrevealsadaptiveresponsesofsteppeplantstoincreasedandreducedwindspeed
AT yexuehua newfieldwindmanipulationmethodologyrevealsadaptiveresponsesofsteppeplantstoincreasedandreducedwindspeed
AT cornelissenjohanneshc newfieldwindmanipulationmethodologyrevealsadaptiveresponsesofsteppeplantstoincreasedandreducedwindspeed