Cargando…
Is ulipristal acetate the new drug of choice for the medical management of uterine fibroids? Res ipsa loquitur?
Ulipristal acetate (Esmya(©)) has been hailed the new wonder drug with regard to the medical management of uterine fibroids, and many postulate that it will remove the need for surgical treatment in the future. While the results from the PEARL studies are certainly promising and its amenorrhoeic rat...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29105584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745505717740218 |
_version_ | 1783633152726532096 |
---|---|
author | Odejinmi, Funlayo Oliver, Reeba Mallick, Rebecca |
author_facet | Odejinmi, Funlayo Oliver, Reeba Mallick, Rebecca |
author_sort | Odejinmi, Funlayo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ulipristal acetate (Esmya(©)) has been hailed the new wonder drug with regard to the medical management of uterine fibroids, and many postulate that it will remove the need for surgical treatment in the future. While the results from the PEARL studies are certainly promising and its amenorrhoeic rates and reduction in fibroid size are unquestionable, there is still a paucity of data with regard to its long-term effects, the effects on its usage prior to surgery and its variable efficacy in different ethnic populations. To facilitate our knowledge further, independent studies with clear outcome measures evaluating the long-term effects of the drug in a wider, more representative, ethnic minority population as well as assessing its true cost-effectiveness compared to surgery are needed. The aim of this article is to review the historical aspects with regard to the management of uterine fibroids to gain an understanding of where we are now and to evaluate the wider use of ulipristal acetate, both its benefits and limitations and postulate where to go in the future in order to allow our women to make safe and informed choices regarding their treatment options. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7789028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77890282021-01-07 Is ulipristal acetate the new drug of choice for the medical management of uterine fibroids? Res ipsa loquitur? Odejinmi, Funlayo Oliver, Reeba Mallick, Rebecca Womens Health (Lond) Reviews Ulipristal acetate (Esmya(©)) has been hailed the new wonder drug with regard to the medical management of uterine fibroids, and many postulate that it will remove the need for surgical treatment in the future. While the results from the PEARL studies are certainly promising and its amenorrhoeic rates and reduction in fibroid size are unquestionable, there is still a paucity of data with regard to its long-term effects, the effects on its usage prior to surgery and its variable efficacy in different ethnic populations. To facilitate our knowledge further, independent studies with clear outcome measures evaluating the long-term effects of the drug in a wider, more representative, ethnic minority population as well as assessing its true cost-effectiveness compared to surgery are needed. The aim of this article is to review the historical aspects with regard to the management of uterine fibroids to gain an understanding of where we are now and to evaluate the wider use of ulipristal acetate, both its benefits and limitations and postulate where to go in the future in order to allow our women to make safe and informed choices regarding their treatment options. SAGE Publications 2017-11-06 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7789028/ /pubmed/29105584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745505717740218 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Reviews Odejinmi, Funlayo Oliver, Reeba Mallick, Rebecca Is ulipristal acetate the new drug of choice for the medical management of uterine fibroids? Res ipsa loquitur? |
title | Is ulipristal acetate the new drug of choice for the medical
management of uterine fibroids? Res ipsa loquitur? |
title_full | Is ulipristal acetate the new drug of choice for the medical
management of uterine fibroids? Res ipsa loquitur? |
title_fullStr | Is ulipristal acetate the new drug of choice for the medical
management of uterine fibroids? Res ipsa loquitur? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is ulipristal acetate the new drug of choice for the medical
management of uterine fibroids? Res ipsa loquitur? |
title_short | Is ulipristal acetate the new drug of choice for the medical
management of uterine fibroids? Res ipsa loquitur? |
title_sort | is ulipristal acetate the new drug of choice for the medical
management of uterine fibroids? res ipsa loquitur? |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29105584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745505717740218 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT odejinmifunlayo isulipristalacetatethenewdrugofchoiceforthemedicalmanagementofuterinefibroidsresipsaloquitur AT oliverreeba isulipristalacetatethenewdrugofchoiceforthemedicalmanagementofuterinefibroidsresipsaloquitur AT mallickrebecca isulipristalacetatethenewdrugofchoiceforthemedicalmanagementofuterinefibroidsresipsaloquitur |