Cargando…
Positive effects of lumbar puncture simulation training for medical students in clinical practice
BACKGROUND: Lumbar puncture (LP) is an invasive medical procedure that can be done by any doctor. Several simulation-based trainings have been built however the evaluations of the theoretical knowledge and the impact of the simulation-based training have never been performed in real life. The object...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02452-3 |
_version_ | 1783633216565936128 |
---|---|
author | Gaubert, Sinead Blet, Alice Dib, Fadia Ceccaldi, Pierre-François Brock, Thomas Calixte, Maude De Macédo, Léa Dujardin, Tiphaine Jean-Louis, Ludivine Leghima, Dhihia Mouyal, Samuel Tordjman, Dan David Plaisance, Patrick Roos, Caroline Remini, Sid-Ahmed Roux, Damien Paquet, Claire |
author_facet | Gaubert, Sinead Blet, Alice Dib, Fadia Ceccaldi, Pierre-François Brock, Thomas Calixte, Maude De Macédo, Léa Dujardin, Tiphaine Jean-Louis, Ludivine Leghima, Dhihia Mouyal, Samuel Tordjman, Dan David Plaisance, Patrick Roos, Caroline Remini, Sid-Ahmed Roux, Damien Paquet, Claire |
author_sort | Gaubert, Sinead |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lumbar puncture (LP) is an invasive medical procedure that can be done by any doctor. Several simulation-based trainings have been built however the evaluations of the theoretical knowledge and the impact of the simulation-based training have never been performed in real life. The objective was to evaluate the impact of a LP training on the theoretical knowledge improvement and the performance of a LP in clinical practice. METHODS: Before and after medical students’ training, theoretical knowledge and confidence level were assessed. Over a 6 months period, the impact of simulation training was evaluated by the success rate of students’ first LP carried out in hospitalized patients and compared to the results of a no-training control. RESULTS: Students’ theoretical knowledge and confidence level showed significant improvement after simulation training on 115 students (p < 0.0001). The evaluation in real life based on 41 students showed that the success rate of the first LP in patients was higher in the LP simulation group compared to the control group (67% vs 14%, p = 0.0025). The technical assistance was also less frequently needed in the LP simulation group (19% vs 57%, respectively, p = 0.017). The rate of students who participated in this educational study was low. DISCUSSION: Simulation-based teaching was an effective way to improve students’ theoretical and practical knowledge. Whether this approach translates to other procedural skills in real clinical settings merits further study. The low participation rate in the study is due to the fact that students are not used to be included in educational studies and to the complexity of evaluation in routine clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-020-02452-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7789333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77893332021-01-07 Positive effects of lumbar puncture simulation training for medical students in clinical practice Gaubert, Sinead Blet, Alice Dib, Fadia Ceccaldi, Pierre-François Brock, Thomas Calixte, Maude De Macédo, Léa Dujardin, Tiphaine Jean-Louis, Ludivine Leghima, Dhihia Mouyal, Samuel Tordjman, Dan David Plaisance, Patrick Roos, Caroline Remini, Sid-Ahmed Roux, Damien Paquet, Claire BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Lumbar puncture (LP) is an invasive medical procedure that can be done by any doctor. Several simulation-based trainings have been built however the evaluations of the theoretical knowledge and the impact of the simulation-based training have never been performed in real life. The objective was to evaluate the impact of a LP training on the theoretical knowledge improvement and the performance of a LP in clinical practice. METHODS: Before and after medical students’ training, theoretical knowledge and confidence level were assessed. Over a 6 months period, the impact of simulation training was evaluated by the success rate of students’ first LP carried out in hospitalized patients and compared to the results of a no-training control. RESULTS: Students’ theoretical knowledge and confidence level showed significant improvement after simulation training on 115 students (p < 0.0001). The evaluation in real life based on 41 students showed that the success rate of the first LP in patients was higher in the LP simulation group compared to the control group (67% vs 14%, p = 0.0025). The technical assistance was also less frequently needed in the LP simulation group (19% vs 57%, respectively, p = 0.017). The rate of students who participated in this educational study was low. DISCUSSION: Simulation-based teaching was an effective way to improve students’ theoretical and practical knowledge. Whether this approach translates to other procedural skills in real clinical settings merits further study. The low participation rate in the study is due to the fact that students are not used to be included in educational studies and to the complexity of evaluation in routine clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-020-02452-3. BioMed Central 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7789333/ /pubmed/33407416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02452-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gaubert, Sinead Blet, Alice Dib, Fadia Ceccaldi, Pierre-François Brock, Thomas Calixte, Maude De Macédo, Léa Dujardin, Tiphaine Jean-Louis, Ludivine Leghima, Dhihia Mouyal, Samuel Tordjman, Dan David Plaisance, Patrick Roos, Caroline Remini, Sid-Ahmed Roux, Damien Paquet, Claire Positive effects of lumbar puncture simulation training for medical students in clinical practice |
title | Positive effects of lumbar puncture simulation training for medical students in clinical practice |
title_full | Positive effects of lumbar puncture simulation training for medical students in clinical practice |
title_fullStr | Positive effects of lumbar puncture simulation training for medical students in clinical practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Positive effects of lumbar puncture simulation training for medical students in clinical practice |
title_short | Positive effects of lumbar puncture simulation training for medical students in clinical practice |
title_sort | positive effects of lumbar puncture simulation training for medical students in clinical practice |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02452-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaubertsinead positiveeffectsoflumbarpuncturesimulationtrainingformedicalstudentsinclinicalpractice AT bletalice positiveeffectsoflumbarpuncturesimulationtrainingformedicalstudentsinclinicalpractice AT dibfadia positiveeffectsoflumbarpuncturesimulationtrainingformedicalstudentsinclinicalpractice AT ceccaldipierrefrancois positiveeffectsoflumbarpuncturesimulationtrainingformedicalstudentsinclinicalpractice AT brockthomas positiveeffectsoflumbarpuncturesimulationtrainingformedicalstudentsinclinicalpractice AT calixtemaude positiveeffectsoflumbarpuncturesimulationtrainingformedicalstudentsinclinicalpractice AT demacedolea positiveeffectsoflumbarpuncturesimulationtrainingformedicalstudentsinclinicalpractice AT dujardintiphaine positiveeffectsoflumbarpuncturesimulationtrainingformedicalstudentsinclinicalpractice AT jeanlouisludivine positiveeffectsoflumbarpuncturesimulationtrainingformedicalstudentsinclinicalpractice AT leghimadhihia positiveeffectsoflumbarpuncturesimulationtrainingformedicalstudentsinclinicalpractice AT mouyalsamuel positiveeffectsoflumbarpuncturesimulationtrainingformedicalstudentsinclinicalpractice AT tordjmandandavid positiveeffectsoflumbarpuncturesimulationtrainingformedicalstudentsinclinicalpractice AT plaisancepatrick positiveeffectsoflumbarpuncturesimulationtrainingformedicalstudentsinclinicalpractice AT rooscaroline positiveeffectsoflumbarpuncturesimulationtrainingformedicalstudentsinclinicalpractice AT reminisidahmed positiveeffectsoflumbarpuncturesimulationtrainingformedicalstudentsinclinicalpractice AT rouxdamien positiveeffectsoflumbarpuncturesimulationtrainingformedicalstudentsinclinicalpractice AT paquetclaire positiveeffectsoflumbarpuncturesimulationtrainingformedicalstudentsinclinicalpractice |