Cargando…

The Phlebotomus papatasi systemic transcriptional response to trypanosomatid-contaminated blood does not differ from the non-infected blood meal

BACKGROUND: Leishmaniasis, caused by parasites of the genus Leishmania, is a disease that affects up to 8 million people worldwide. Parasites are transmitted to human and animal hosts through the bite of an infected sand fly. Novel strategies for disease control require a better understanding of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sloan, Megan A., Sadlova, Jovana, Lestinova, Tereza, Sanders, Mandy J., Cotton, James A., Volf, Petr, Ligoxygakis, Petros
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04498-0
_version_ 1783633223622852608
author Sloan, Megan A.
Sadlova, Jovana
Lestinova, Tereza
Sanders, Mandy J.
Cotton, James A.
Volf, Petr
Ligoxygakis, Petros
author_facet Sloan, Megan A.
Sadlova, Jovana
Lestinova, Tereza
Sanders, Mandy J.
Cotton, James A.
Volf, Petr
Ligoxygakis, Petros
author_sort Sloan, Megan A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Leishmaniasis, caused by parasites of the genus Leishmania, is a disease that affects up to 8 million people worldwide. Parasites are transmitted to human and animal hosts through the bite of an infected sand fly. Novel strategies for disease control require a better understanding of the key step for transmission, namely the establishment of infection inside the fly. METHODS: The aim of this work was to identify sand fly systemic transcriptomic signatures associated with Leishmania infection. We used next generation sequencing to describe the transcriptome of whole Phlebotomus papatasi sand flies when fed with blood alone (control) or with blood containing one of three trypanosomatids: Leishmania major, L. donovani and Herpetomonas muscarum, the latter being a parasite not transmitted to humans. RESULTS: Of the trypanosomatids studied, only L. major was able to successfully establish an infection in the host P. papatasi. However, the transcriptional signatures observed after each parasite-contaminated blood meal were not specific to success or failure of a specific infection and they did not differ from each other. The transcriptional signatures were also indistinguishable after a non-contaminated blood meal. CONCLUSIONS: The results imply that sand flies perceive Leishmania as just one feature of their microbiome landscape and that any strategy to tackle transmission should focus on the response towards the blood meal rather than parasite establishment. Alternatively, Leishmania could suppress host responses. These results will generate new thinking around the concept of stopping transmission by controlling the parasite inside the insect. [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7789365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77893652021-01-07 The Phlebotomus papatasi systemic transcriptional response to trypanosomatid-contaminated blood does not differ from the non-infected blood meal Sloan, Megan A. Sadlova, Jovana Lestinova, Tereza Sanders, Mandy J. Cotton, James A. Volf, Petr Ligoxygakis, Petros Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Leishmaniasis, caused by parasites of the genus Leishmania, is a disease that affects up to 8 million people worldwide. Parasites are transmitted to human and animal hosts through the bite of an infected sand fly. Novel strategies for disease control require a better understanding of the key step for transmission, namely the establishment of infection inside the fly. METHODS: The aim of this work was to identify sand fly systemic transcriptomic signatures associated with Leishmania infection. We used next generation sequencing to describe the transcriptome of whole Phlebotomus papatasi sand flies when fed with blood alone (control) or with blood containing one of three trypanosomatids: Leishmania major, L. donovani and Herpetomonas muscarum, the latter being a parasite not transmitted to humans. RESULTS: Of the trypanosomatids studied, only L. major was able to successfully establish an infection in the host P. papatasi. However, the transcriptional signatures observed after each parasite-contaminated blood meal were not specific to success or failure of a specific infection and they did not differ from each other. The transcriptional signatures were also indistinguishable after a non-contaminated blood meal. CONCLUSIONS: The results imply that sand flies perceive Leishmania as just one feature of their microbiome landscape and that any strategy to tackle transmission should focus on the response towards the blood meal rather than parasite establishment. Alternatively, Leishmania could suppress host responses. These results will generate new thinking around the concept of stopping transmission by controlling the parasite inside the insect. [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7789365/ /pubmed/33407867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04498-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sloan, Megan A.
Sadlova, Jovana
Lestinova, Tereza
Sanders, Mandy J.
Cotton, James A.
Volf, Petr
Ligoxygakis, Petros
The Phlebotomus papatasi systemic transcriptional response to trypanosomatid-contaminated blood does not differ from the non-infected blood meal
title The Phlebotomus papatasi systemic transcriptional response to trypanosomatid-contaminated blood does not differ from the non-infected blood meal
title_full The Phlebotomus papatasi systemic transcriptional response to trypanosomatid-contaminated blood does not differ from the non-infected blood meal
title_fullStr The Phlebotomus papatasi systemic transcriptional response to trypanosomatid-contaminated blood does not differ from the non-infected blood meal
title_full_unstemmed The Phlebotomus papatasi systemic transcriptional response to trypanosomatid-contaminated blood does not differ from the non-infected blood meal
title_short The Phlebotomus papatasi systemic transcriptional response to trypanosomatid-contaminated blood does not differ from the non-infected blood meal
title_sort phlebotomus papatasi systemic transcriptional response to trypanosomatid-contaminated blood does not differ from the non-infected blood meal
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04498-0
work_keys_str_mv AT sloanmegana thephlebotomuspapatasisystemictranscriptionalresponsetotrypanosomatidcontaminatedblooddoesnotdifferfromthenoninfectedbloodmeal
AT sadlovajovana thephlebotomuspapatasisystemictranscriptionalresponsetotrypanosomatidcontaminatedblooddoesnotdifferfromthenoninfectedbloodmeal
AT lestinovatereza thephlebotomuspapatasisystemictranscriptionalresponsetotrypanosomatidcontaminatedblooddoesnotdifferfromthenoninfectedbloodmeal
AT sandersmandyj thephlebotomuspapatasisystemictranscriptionalresponsetotrypanosomatidcontaminatedblooddoesnotdifferfromthenoninfectedbloodmeal
AT cottonjamesa thephlebotomuspapatasisystemictranscriptionalresponsetotrypanosomatidcontaminatedblooddoesnotdifferfromthenoninfectedbloodmeal
AT volfpetr thephlebotomuspapatasisystemictranscriptionalresponsetotrypanosomatidcontaminatedblooddoesnotdifferfromthenoninfectedbloodmeal
AT ligoxygakispetros thephlebotomuspapatasisystemictranscriptionalresponsetotrypanosomatidcontaminatedblooddoesnotdifferfromthenoninfectedbloodmeal
AT sloanmegana phlebotomuspapatasisystemictranscriptionalresponsetotrypanosomatidcontaminatedblooddoesnotdifferfromthenoninfectedbloodmeal
AT sadlovajovana phlebotomuspapatasisystemictranscriptionalresponsetotrypanosomatidcontaminatedblooddoesnotdifferfromthenoninfectedbloodmeal
AT lestinovatereza phlebotomuspapatasisystemictranscriptionalresponsetotrypanosomatidcontaminatedblooddoesnotdifferfromthenoninfectedbloodmeal
AT sandersmandyj phlebotomuspapatasisystemictranscriptionalresponsetotrypanosomatidcontaminatedblooddoesnotdifferfromthenoninfectedbloodmeal
AT cottonjamesa phlebotomuspapatasisystemictranscriptionalresponsetotrypanosomatidcontaminatedblooddoesnotdifferfromthenoninfectedbloodmeal
AT volfpetr phlebotomuspapatasisystemictranscriptionalresponsetotrypanosomatidcontaminatedblooddoesnotdifferfromthenoninfectedbloodmeal
AT ligoxygakispetros phlebotomuspapatasisystemictranscriptionalresponsetotrypanosomatidcontaminatedblooddoesnotdifferfromthenoninfectedbloodmeal