Cargando…
Why do infants need out-of-hospital emergency medical services? A retrospective, population-based study
BACKGROUND: The challenges encountered in emergency medical services (EMS) contacts with children are likely most pronounced in infants, but little is known about their out-of-hospital care. Our primary aim was to describe the characteristics of EMS contacts with infants. The secondary aims were to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00816-8 |
_version_ | 1783633229490683904 |
---|---|
author | Oulasvirta, Jelena Harve-Rytsälä, Heini Lääperi, Mitja Kuisma, Markku Salmi, Heli |
author_facet | Oulasvirta, Jelena Harve-Rytsälä, Heini Lääperi, Mitja Kuisma, Markku Salmi, Heli |
author_sort | Oulasvirta, Jelena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The challenges encountered in emergency medical services (EMS) contacts with children are likely most pronounced in infants, but little is known about their out-of-hospital care. Our primary aim was to describe the characteristics of EMS contacts with infants. The secondary aims were to examine the symptom-based dispatch system for nonverbal infants, and to observe the association of unfavorable patient outcomes with patient and EMS mission characteristics. METHODS: In a population-based 5-year retrospective cohort of all 1712 EMS responses for infants (age < 1 year) in Helsinki, Finland (population 643,000, < 1-year old population 6548), we studied 1) the characteristics of EMS missions with infants; 2) mortality within 12 months; 3) pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions; 4) medical state of the infant upon presentation to the emergency department (ED); 5) any medication or respiratory support given at the ED; 6) hospitalization; and 7) surgical procedures during the same hospital visit. RESULTS: 1712 infants with a median age of 6.7 months were encountered, comprising 0.4% of all EMS missions. The most common complaints were dyspnea, low-energy falls, and choking. Two infants died on-scene. The EMS transported 683 (39.9%) infants. One (0.1%) infant died during the 12-month follow-up period. Ninety-one infants had abnormal clinical examination upon arrival at the ED. PICU admissions (n = 28) were associated with young age (P < 0.01), a history of prematurity or problems in the neonatal period (P = 0.01), and previous EMS contacts within 72 h (P = 0.04). The adult-derived dispatch codes did not associate with the final diagnoses of the infants. CONCLUSIONS: Infants form a small but distinct group in pediatric EMS care, with specific characteristics differing from the overall pediatric population. Many EMS contacts with infants were nonurgent or medically unjustified, possibly reflecting an unmet need for other family services. The use of adult-derived symptom codes for dispatching is not optimal for infants. Unfavorable patient outcomes were rare. Risk factors for such outcomes include quickly renewed contacts, young age and health problems in the neonatal period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7789394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77893942021-01-07 Why do infants need out-of-hospital emergency medical services? A retrospective, population-based study Oulasvirta, Jelena Harve-Rytsälä, Heini Lääperi, Mitja Kuisma, Markku Salmi, Heli Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: The challenges encountered in emergency medical services (EMS) contacts with children are likely most pronounced in infants, but little is known about their out-of-hospital care. Our primary aim was to describe the characteristics of EMS contacts with infants. The secondary aims were to examine the symptom-based dispatch system for nonverbal infants, and to observe the association of unfavorable patient outcomes with patient and EMS mission characteristics. METHODS: In a population-based 5-year retrospective cohort of all 1712 EMS responses for infants (age < 1 year) in Helsinki, Finland (population 643,000, < 1-year old population 6548), we studied 1) the characteristics of EMS missions with infants; 2) mortality within 12 months; 3) pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions; 4) medical state of the infant upon presentation to the emergency department (ED); 5) any medication or respiratory support given at the ED; 6) hospitalization; and 7) surgical procedures during the same hospital visit. RESULTS: 1712 infants with a median age of 6.7 months were encountered, comprising 0.4% of all EMS missions. The most common complaints were dyspnea, low-energy falls, and choking. Two infants died on-scene. The EMS transported 683 (39.9%) infants. One (0.1%) infant died during the 12-month follow-up period. Ninety-one infants had abnormal clinical examination upon arrival at the ED. PICU admissions (n = 28) were associated with young age (P < 0.01), a history of prematurity or problems in the neonatal period (P = 0.01), and previous EMS contacts within 72 h (P = 0.04). The adult-derived dispatch codes did not associate with the final diagnoses of the infants. CONCLUSIONS: Infants form a small but distinct group in pediatric EMS care, with specific characteristics differing from the overall pediatric population. Many EMS contacts with infants were nonurgent or medically unjustified, possibly reflecting an unmet need for other family services. The use of adult-derived symptom codes for dispatching is not optimal for infants. Unfavorable patient outcomes were rare. Risk factors for such outcomes include quickly renewed contacts, young age and health problems in the neonatal period. BioMed Central 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7789394/ /pubmed/33413571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00816-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Oulasvirta, Jelena Harve-Rytsälä, Heini Lääperi, Mitja Kuisma, Markku Salmi, Heli Why do infants need out-of-hospital emergency medical services? A retrospective, population-based study |
title | Why do infants need out-of-hospital emergency medical services? A retrospective, population-based study |
title_full | Why do infants need out-of-hospital emergency medical services? A retrospective, population-based study |
title_fullStr | Why do infants need out-of-hospital emergency medical services? A retrospective, population-based study |
title_full_unstemmed | Why do infants need out-of-hospital emergency medical services? A retrospective, population-based study |
title_short | Why do infants need out-of-hospital emergency medical services? A retrospective, population-based study |
title_sort | why do infants need out-of-hospital emergency medical services? a retrospective, population-based study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00816-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oulasvirtajelena whydoinfantsneedoutofhospitalemergencymedicalservicesaretrospectivepopulationbasedstudy AT harverytsalaheini whydoinfantsneedoutofhospitalemergencymedicalservicesaretrospectivepopulationbasedstudy AT laaperimitja whydoinfantsneedoutofhospitalemergencymedicalservicesaretrospectivepopulationbasedstudy AT kuismamarkku whydoinfantsneedoutofhospitalemergencymedicalservicesaretrospectivepopulationbasedstudy AT salmiheli whydoinfantsneedoutofhospitalemergencymedicalservicesaretrospectivepopulationbasedstudy |