Cargando…
Micro-costing in health and medicine: a critical appraisal
BACKGROUND: Concerns about rising health care costs require rigorous economic study to inform clinical and policy decision-making. Micro-costing is a cost estimation methodology employing detailed resource utilization and unit cost data to generate precise estimates of economic costs. Micro-costing...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33404857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-020-00298-5 |
_version_ | 1783633256978055168 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Xiao Lazar, Christina M. Ruger, Jennifer Prah |
author_facet | Xu, Xiao Lazar, Christina M. Ruger, Jennifer Prah |
author_sort | Xu, Xiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Concerns about rising health care costs require rigorous economic study to inform clinical and policy decision-making. Micro-costing is a cost estimation methodology employing detailed resource utilization and unit cost data to generate precise estimates of economic costs. Micro-costing studies have not been critically appraised. METHODS: Critical appraisal of micro-costing studies in English. Studies fully or predominantly employing micro-costing were appraised for methodological and reporting quality through economic evaluation guidelines (Evers, Drummond, Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS), Fukuda and Imanaka checklists). Following the Panel on Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine, micro-costing studies were defined as involving “direct enumeration and costing out of every input consumed in the treatment of a particular patient.” RESULTS: Full or predominant micro-costing studies included neoplasms (18.5%), infectious and parasitic diseases (17.9%), and diseases of circulatory systems (10.8%) as the most studied diseases. 36.9% were in the United States and 34.9% were in Europe. 33.8% did not report analytic perspective, 32.8% did not report price year, 3.6% did not inflation adjust cost data, and 44.1% did not specify inflation adjustment. 86.2% did not separately report unit costs and resource utilization quantity, 14.9 and 19.5% did not provide sufficient detail to assess appropriateness of measured physical units or valued costs. CONCLUSIONS: Micro-costing studies vary widely in methodological and reporting quality, highlighting the need to standardize methods and reporting of micro-costing studies and develop tools for their evaluation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13561-020-00298-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7789519 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77895192021-01-07 Micro-costing in health and medicine: a critical appraisal Xu, Xiao Lazar, Christina M. Ruger, Jennifer Prah Health Econ Rev Review BACKGROUND: Concerns about rising health care costs require rigorous economic study to inform clinical and policy decision-making. Micro-costing is a cost estimation methodology employing detailed resource utilization and unit cost data to generate precise estimates of economic costs. Micro-costing studies have not been critically appraised. METHODS: Critical appraisal of micro-costing studies in English. Studies fully or predominantly employing micro-costing were appraised for methodological and reporting quality through economic evaluation guidelines (Evers, Drummond, Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS), Fukuda and Imanaka checklists). Following the Panel on Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine, micro-costing studies were defined as involving “direct enumeration and costing out of every input consumed in the treatment of a particular patient.” RESULTS: Full or predominant micro-costing studies included neoplasms (18.5%), infectious and parasitic diseases (17.9%), and diseases of circulatory systems (10.8%) as the most studied diseases. 36.9% were in the United States and 34.9% were in Europe. 33.8% did not report analytic perspective, 32.8% did not report price year, 3.6% did not inflation adjust cost data, and 44.1% did not specify inflation adjustment. 86.2% did not separately report unit costs and resource utilization quantity, 14.9 and 19.5% did not provide sufficient detail to assess appropriateness of measured physical units or valued costs. CONCLUSIONS: Micro-costing studies vary widely in methodological and reporting quality, highlighting the need to standardize methods and reporting of micro-costing studies and develop tools for their evaluation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13561-020-00298-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7789519/ /pubmed/33404857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-020-00298-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Xu, Xiao Lazar, Christina M. Ruger, Jennifer Prah Micro-costing in health and medicine: a critical appraisal |
title | Micro-costing in health and medicine: a critical appraisal |
title_full | Micro-costing in health and medicine: a critical appraisal |
title_fullStr | Micro-costing in health and medicine: a critical appraisal |
title_full_unstemmed | Micro-costing in health and medicine: a critical appraisal |
title_short | Micro-costing in health and medicine: a critical appraisal |
title_sort | micro-costing in health and medicine: a critical appraisal |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33404857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-020-00298-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xuxiao microcostinginhealthandmedicineacriticalappraisal AT lazarchristinam microcostinginhealthandmedicineacriticalappraisal AT rugerjenniferprah microcostinginhealthandmedicineacriticalappraisal |