Cargando…
A comparison of laryngeal mask airway-supreme and endotracheal tube use with respect to airway protection in patients undergoing septoplasty: a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial
BACKGROUND: There are doubts among anesthesiologists on the use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in nasal surgeries because of concerns about the occurrence of blood leakages to the airway. We hypothesized that the use of LMA-Supreme (LMA-S) in nasal surgery is comparable with endotracheal tube (E...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01222-4 |
_version_ | 1783633266562039808 |
---|---|
author | Karaaslan, Erol Akbas, Sedat Ozkan, Ahmet Selim Colak, Cemil Begec, Zekine |
author_facet | Karaaslan, Erol Akbas, Sedat Ozkan, Ahmet Selim Colak, Cemil Begec, Zekine |
author_sort | Karaaslan, Erol |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are doubts among anesthesiologists on the use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in nasal surgeries because of concerns about the occurrence of blood leakages to the airway. We hypothesized that the use of LMA-Supreme (LMA-S) in nasal surgery is comparable with endotracheal tube (ETT) according to airway protection against blood leakage through the fiberoptic bronchoscopy, oropharyngeal leakage pressure (OLP), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and postoperative adverse events. METHODS: The present study was conducted in a prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled manner on 80 patients, who underwent septoplasty procedures under general anesthesia, after dividing them randomly into two groups according to the device used (LMA-S or ETT). The presence of blood in the airway (glottis/trachea, distal trachea) was analyzed with the fiberoptic bronchoscope and a four-point scale. Both groups were evaluated for OLP; HR; MAP; postoperative sore throat, nausea, and vomiting; dysphagia; and dysphonia. RESULTS: In the fiberoptic evaluation of the airway postoperatively, less blood leakage was detected in both anatomic areas in the LMA-S group than in the ETT group (glottis/trachea, p = 0.004; distal trachea, p = 0.034). Sore throat was detected less frequently in the LMA-S group at a significant level in the 2nd, 6th, and 12th hours of postoperative period; however, other adverse events were similar in both groups. Hemodynamic parameters were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The present findings demonstrate that the LMA-S provided more effective airway protection than the ETT in preventing blood leakage in the septoplasty procedures. We believe that the LMA-S can be used safely and as an alternative to the ETT in septoplasty cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at the US National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov) # NCT03903679 on April 5, 2019. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7789562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77895622021-01-07 A comparison of laryngeal mask airway-supreme and endotracheal tube use with respect to airway protection in patients undergoing septoplasty: a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial Karaaslan, Erol Akbas, Sedat Ozkan, Ahmet Selim Colak, Cemil Begec, Zekine BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: There are doubts among anesthesiologists on the use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in nasal surgeries because of concerns about the occurrence of blood leakages to the airway. We hypothesized that the use of LMA-Supreme (LMA-S) in nasal surgery is comparable with endotracheal tube (ETT) according to airway protection against blood leakage through the fiberoptic bronchoscopy, oropharyngeal leakage pressure (OLP), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and postoperative adverse events. METHODS: The present study was conducted in a prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled manner on 80 patients, who underwent septoplasty procedures under general anesthesia, after dividing them randomly into two groups according to the device used (LMA-S or ETT). The presence of blood in the airway (glottis/trachea, distal trachea) was analyzed with the fiberoptic bronchoscope and a four-point scale. Both groups were evaluated for OLP; HR; MAP; postoperative sore throat, nausea, and vomiting; dysphagia; and dysphonia. RESULTS: In the fiberoptic evaluation of the airway postoperatively, less blood leakage was detected in both anatomic areas in the LMA-S group than in the ETT group (glottis/trachea, p = 0.004; distal trachea, p = 0.034). Sore throat was detected less frequently in the LMA-S group at a significant level in the 2nd, 6th, and 12th hours of postoperative period; however, other adverse events were similar in both groups. Hemodynamic parameters were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The present findings demonstrate that the LMA-S provided more effective airway protection than the ETT in preventing blood leakage in the septoplasty procedures. We believe that the LMA-S can be used safely and as an alternative to the ETT in septoplasty cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at the US National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov) # NCT03903679 on April 5, 2019. BioMed Central 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7789562/ /pubmed/33407130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01222-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Karaaslan, Erol Akbas, Sedat Ozkan, Ahmet Selim Colak, Cemil Begec, Zekine A comparison of laryngeal mask airway-supreme and endotracheal tube use with respect to airway protection in patients undergoing septoplasty: a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial |
title | A comparison of laryngeal mask airway-supreme and endotracheal tube use with respect to airway protection in patients undergoing septoplasty: a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial |
title_full | A comparison of laryngeal mask airway-supreme and endotracheal tube use with respect to airway protection in patients undergoing septoplasty: a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial |
title_fullStr | A comparison of laryngeal mask airway-supreme and endotracheal tube use with respect to airway protection in patients undergoing septoplasty: a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of laryngeal mask airway-supreme and endotracheal tube use with respect to airway protection in patients undergoing septoplasty: a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial |
title_short | A comparison of laryngeal mask airway-supreme and endotracheal tube use with respect to airway protection in patients undergoing septoplasty: a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial |
title_sort | comparison of laryngeal mask airway-supreme and endotracheal tube use with respect to airway protection in patients undergoing septoplasty: a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01222-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karaaslanerol acomparisonoflaryngealmaskairwaysupremeandendotrachealtubeusewithrespecttoairwayprotectioninpatientsundergoingseptoplastyarandomizedsingleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial AT akbassedat acomparisonoflaryngealmaskairwaysupremeandendotrachealtubeusewithrespecttoairwayprotectioninpatientsundergoingseptoplastyarandomizedsingleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial AT ozkanahmetselim acomparisonoflaryngealmaskairwaysupremeandendotrachealtubeusewithrespecttoairwayprotectioninpatientsundergoingseptoplastyarandomizedsingleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial AT colakcemil acomparisonoflaryngealmaskairwaysupremeandendotrachealtubeusewithrespecttoairwayprotectioninpatientsundergoingseptoplastyarandomizedsingleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial AT begeczekine acomparisonoflaryngealmaskairwaysupremeandendotrachealtubeusewithrespecttoairwayprotectioninpatientsundergoingseptoplastyarandomizedsingleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial AT karaaslanerol comparisonoflaryngealmaskairwaysupremeandendotrachealtubeusewithrespecttoairwayprotectioninpatientsundergoingseptoplastyarandomizedsingleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial AT akbassedat comparisonoflaryngealmaskairwaysupremeandendotrachealtubeusewithrespecttoairwayprotectioninpatientsundergoingseptoplastyarandomizedsingleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial AT ozkanahmetselim comparisonoflaryngealmaskairwaysupremeandendotrachealtubeusewithrespecttoairwayprotectioninpatientsundergoingseptoplastyarandomizedsingleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial AT colakcemil comparisonoflaryngealmaskairwaysupremeandendotrachealtubeusewithrespecttoairwayprotectioninpatientsundergoingseptoplastyarandomizedsingleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial AT begeczekine comparisonoflaryngealmaskairwaysupremeandendotrachealtubeusewithrespecttoairwayprotectioninpatientsundergoingseptoplastyarandomizedsingleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial |