Cargando…

Switching first-line targeted therapy after not reaching low disease activity within 6 months is superior to conservative approach: a propensity score-matched analysis from the ATTRA registry

BACKGROUND: Treat-to-target (T2T) is a widely accepted strategy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It recommends attaining a goal of at least low disease activity (LDA) within 6 months; otherwise, the current therapy should be modified. We aimed to investigate whether switching a first-lin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nekvindová, Lucie, Vencovský, Jiří, Pavelka, Karel, Horák, Pavel, Křístková, Zlatuše, Závada, Jakub
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-02393-8
_version_ 1783633273656705024
author Nekvindová, Lucie
Vencovský, Jiří
Pavelka, Karel
Horák, Pavel
Křístková, Zlatuše
Závada, Jakub
author_facet Nekvindová, Lucie
Vencovský, Jiří
Pavelka, Karel
Horák, Pavel
Křístková, Zlatuše
Závada, Jakub
author_sort Nekvindová, Lucie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treat-to-target (T2T) is a widely accepted strategy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It recommends attaining a goal of at least low disease activity (LDA) within 6 months; otherwise, the current therapy should be modified. We aimed to investigate whether switching a first-line targeted therapy (TT) in patients not reaching LDA within 6 months leads to a higher probability of meeting LDA at the 12-month visit in daily clinical practice using data from Czech registry ATTRA. METHODS: We included patients with RA starting the first-line TT from 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2017 with at least 1-year follow-up. We created four mutually exclusive cohorts based on (1) switching to another TT within the first year and (2) reaching a treatment target (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2) at the 6-month visit. The primary outcome was the comparison of odds for reaching remission (REM) or LDA at the 12-month visit between patients switching and not switching TT after not reaching treatment target at 6 months. Before using logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio, we employed the propensity score to match patients at the 6-month visit. RESULTS: A total of 1275 patients were eligible for the analysis. Sixty-two patients switched within the first 5 months of the treatment before evaluating treatment response at the 6-month visit (C1); 598 patients reached the treatment target within 6 months of therapy (C2); 124 patients did not reach treatment response at 6-month visit and switched to another therapy (C3), and 491 patients continued with the same treatment despite not reaching LDA at the 6-month visit (C4). We matched 75 patients from cohort C3 and 75 patients from C4 using the propensity score. Patients following the T2T principle (C3) showed 2.8 (95% CI 1.4–5.8; p = 0.005) times increased likelihood of achieving REM/LDA at the 12-month visit compared to patients not following the T2T strategy (C4). CONCLUSIONS: In daily clinical practice, the application of the T2T strategy is underused. Switching TT after not reaching REM/LDA within the first 6 months leads to a higher probability of achieving REM/LDA in RA patients at the 12-month visit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7789592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77895922021-01-07 Switching first-line targeted therapy after not reaching low disease activity within 6 months is superior to conservative approach: a propensity score-matched analysis from the ATTRA registry Nekvindová, Lucie Vencovský, Jiří Pavelka, Karel Horák, Pavel Křístková, Zlatuše Závada, Jakub Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: Treat-to-target (T2T) is a widely accepted strategy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It recommends attaining a goal of at least low disease activity (LDA) within 6 months; otherwise, the current therapy should be modified. We aimed to investigate whether switching a first-line targeted therapy (TT) in patients not reaching LDA within 6 months leads to a higher probability of meeting LDA at the 12-month visit in daily clinical practice using data from Czech registry ATTRA. METHODS: We included patients with RA starting the first-line TT from 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2017 with at least 1-year follow-up. We created four mutually exclusive cohorts based on (1) switching to another TT within the first year and (2) reaching a treatment target (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2) at the 6-month visit. The primary outcome was the comparison of odds for reaching remission (REM) or LDA at the 12-month visit between patients switching and not switching TT after not reaching treatment target at 6 months. Before using logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio, we employed the propensity score to match patients at the 6-month visit. RESULTS: A total of 1275 patients were eligible for the analysis. Sixty-two patients switched within the first 5 months of the treatment before evaluating treatment response at the 6-month visit (C1); 598 patients reached the treatment target within 6 months of therapy (C2); 124 patients did not reach treatment response at 6-month visit and switched to another therapy (C3), and 491 patients continued with the same treatment despite not reaching LDA at the 6-month visit (C4). We matched 75 patients from cohort C3 and 75 patients from C4 using the propensity score. Patients following the T2T principle (C3) showed 2.8 (95% CI 1.4–5.8; p = 0.005) times increased likelihood of achieving REM/LDA at the 12-month visit compared to patients not following the T2T strategy (C4). CONCLUSIONS: In daily clinical practice, the application of the T2T strategy is underused. Switching TT after not reaching REM/LDA within the first 6 months leads to a higher probability of achieving REM/LDA in RA patients at the 12-month visit. BioMed Central 2021-01-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7789592/ /pubmed/33407803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-02393-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nekvindová, Lucie
Vencovský, Jiří
Pavelka, Karel
Horák, Pavel
Křístková, Zlatuše
Závada, Jakub
Switching first-line targeted therapy after not reaching low disease activity within 6 months is superior to conservative approach: a propensity score-matched analysis from the ATTRA registry
title Switching first-line targeted therapy after not reaching low disease activity within 6 months is superior to conservative approach: a propensity score-matched analysis from the ATTRA registry
title_full Switching first-line targeted therapy after not reaching low disease activity within 6 months is superior to conservative approach: a propensity score-matched analysis from the ATTRA registry
title_fullStr Switching first-line targeted therapy after not reaching low disease activity within 6 months is superior to conservative approach: a propensity score-matched analysis from the ATTRA registry
title_full_unstemmed Switching first-line targeted therapy after not reaching low disease activity within 6 months is superior to conservative approach: a propensity score-matched analysis from the ATTRA registry
title_short Switching first-line targeted therapy after not reaching low disease activity within 6 months is superior to conservative approach: a propensity score-matched analysis from the ATTRA registry
title_sort switching first-line targeted therapy after not reaching low disease activity within 6 months is superior to conservative approach: a propensity score-matched analysis from the attra registry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-02393-8
work_keys_str_mv AT nekvindovalucie switchingfirstlinetargetedtherapyafternotreachinglowdiseaseactivitywithin6monthsissuperiortoconservativeapproachapropensityscorematchedanalysisfromtheattraregistry
AT vencovskyjiri switchingfirstlinetargetedtherapyafternotreachinglowdiseaseactivitywithin6monthsissuperiortoconservativeapproachapropensityscorematchedanalysisfromtheattraregistry
AT pavelkakarel switchingfirstlinetargetedtherapyafternotreachinglowdiseaseactivitywithin6monthsissuperiortoconservativeapproachapropensityscorematchedanalysisfromtheattraregistry
AT horakpavel switchingfirstlinetargetedtherapyafternotreachinglowdiseaseactivitywithin6monthsissuperiortoconservativeapproachapropensityscorematchedanalysisfromtheattraregistry
AT kristkovazlatuse switchingfirstlinetargetedtherapyafternotreachinglowdiseaseactivitywithin6monthsissuperiortoconservativeapproachapropensityscorematchedanalysisfromtheattraregistry
AT zavadajakub switchingfirstlinetargetedtherapyafternotreachinglowdiseaseactivitywithin6monthsissuperiortoconservativeapproachapropensityscorematchedanalysisfromtheattraregistry