Cargando…

Approaches to motivate physicians and nurses in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review

Poor health worker motivation, and the resultant shortages and geographic imbalances of providers, impedes the provision of quality care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This systematic review summarizes the evidence on interventions used to motivate health workers in LMICs. A standardiz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Jaya, Patwa, Mariya C., Khuu, Angel, Creanga, Andreea A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00522-7
_version_ 1783633294110228480
author Gupta, Jaya
Patwa, Mariya C.
Khuu, Angel
Creanga, Andreea A.
author_facet Gupta, Jaya
Patwa, Mariya C.
Khuu, Angel
Creanga, Andreea A.
author_sort Gupta, Jaya
collection PubMed
description Poor health worker motivation, and the resultant shortages and geographic imbalances of providers, impedes the provision of quality care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This systematic review summarizes the evidence on interventions used to motivate health workers in LMICs. A standardized keyword search strategy was employed across five databases from September 2007 -September 2017. Studies had to meet the following criteria: original study; doctors and/or nurses as target population for intervention(s); work motivation as study outcome; study design with clearly defined comparison group; categorized as either a supervision, compensation, systems support, or lifelong learning intervention; and conducted in a LMIC setting. Two independent reviewers screened 3845 titles and abstracts and, subsequently, reviewed 269 full articles. Seven studies were retained from China (n = 1), Ghana (n = 2), Iran (n = 1), Mozambique (n = 1), and Zambia (n = 2). Study data and risk of bias were extracted using a standardized form. Though work motivation was the primary study outcome, four studies did not provide an outcome definition and five studies did not describe use of a theoretical framework in the ascertainment. Four studies used a randomized trial—group design, one used a non-randomized trial—group design, one used a cross-sectional design, and one used a pretest–posttest design. All three studies that found a significant positive effect on motivational outcomes had a supervision component. Of the three studies that found no effects on motivation, two were primarily compensation interventions and the third was a systems support intervention. One study found a significant negative effect of a compensation intervention on health worker motivation. In conducting this systematic review, we found there is limited evidence on successful interventions to motivate health workers in LMICs. True effects on select categories of health workers may have been obscured given that studies included health workers with a wide range of social and professional characteristics. Robust studies that use validated and culturally appropriate tools to assess worker motivation are greatly needed in the Sustainable Development Goals era.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7789684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77896842021-01-07 Approaches to motivate physicians and nurses in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review Gupta, Jaya Patwa, Mariya C. Khuu, Angel Creanga, Andreea A. Hum Resour Health Review Poor health worker motivation, and the resultant shortages and geographic imbalances of providers, impedes the provision of quality care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This systematic review summarizes the evidence on interventions used to motivate health workers in LMICs. A standardized keyword search strategy was employed across five databases from September 2007 -September 2017. Studies had to meet the following criteria: original study; doctors and/or nurses as target population for intervention(s); work motivation as study outcome; study design with clearly defined comparison group; categorized as either a supervision, compensation, systems support, or lifelong learning intervention; and conducted in a LMIC setting. Two independent reviewers screened 3845 titles and abstracts and, subsequently, reviewed 269 full articles. Seven studies were retained from China (n = 1), Ghana (n = 2), Iran (n = 1), Mozambique (n = 1), and Zambia (n = 2). Study data and risk of bias were extracted using a standardized form. Though work motivation was the primary study outcome, four studies did not provide an outcome definition and five studies did not describe use of a theoretical framework in the ascertainment. Four studies used a randomized trial—group design, one used a non-randomized trial—group design, one used a cross-sectional design, and one used a pretest–posttest design. All three studies that found a significant positive effect on motivational outcomes had a supervision component. Of the three studies that found no effects on motivation, two were primarily compensation interventions and the third was a systems support intervention. One study found a significant negative effect of a compensation intervention on health worker motivation. In conducting this systematic review, we found there is limited evidence on successful interventions to motivate health workers in LMICs. True effects on select categories of health workers may have been obscured given that studies included health workers with a wide range of social and professional characteristics. Robust studies that use validated and culturally appropriate tools to assess worker motivation are greatly needed in the Sustainable Development Goals era. BioMed Central 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7789684/ /pubmed/33407597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00522-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Gupta, Jaya
Patwa, Mariya C.
Khuu, Angel
Creanga, Andreea A.
Approaches to motivate physicians and nurses in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review
title Approaches to motivate physicians and nurses in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review
title_full Approaches to motivate physicians and nurses in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Approaches to motivate physicians and nurses in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Approaches to motivate physicians and nurses in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review
title_short Approaches to motivate physicians and nurses in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review
title_sort approaches to motivate physicians and nurses in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00522-7
work_keys_str_mv AT guptajaya approachestomotivatephysiciansandnursesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicliteraturereview
AT patwamariyac approachestomotivatephysiciansandnursesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicliteraturereview
AT khuuangel approachestomotivatephysiciansandnursesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicliteraturereview
AT creangaandreeaa approachestomotivatephysiciansandnursesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicliteraturereview