Cargando…
The evaluation of annuloplasty in bicuspid aortic valve repair using cardiac magnetic resonance
BACKGROUND: The incompetent bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) can be replaced or repaired using various surgical techniques. This study sought to assess the efficacy of external annuloplasty and postoperative reverse remodelling using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and compare the results of external an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01831-4 |
_version_ | 1783633312325042176 |
---|---|
author | Jasinski, Marek J. Miszalski-Jamka, Karol Kosiorowska, Kinga Gocol, Radoslaw Wenzel-Jasinska, Izabella Bielicki, Grzegorz Berezowski, Mikolaj Lukaszewski, Marceli Kansy, Andrzej Deja, Marek A. |
author_facet | Jasinski, Marek J. Miszalski-Jamka, Karol Kosiorowska, Kinga Gocol, Radoslaw Wenzel-Jasinska, Izabella Bielicki, Grzegorz Berezowski, Mikolaj Lukaszewski, Marceli Kansy, Andrzej Deja, Marek A. |
author_sort | Jasinski, Marek J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The incompetent bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) can be replaced or repaired using various surgical techniques. This study sought to assess the efficacy of external annuloplasty and postoperative reverse remodelling using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and compare the results of external and subcommissural annuloplasty. METHODS: Out of a total of 200 BAV repair performed between 2004 and 2018, 21 consecutive patients (median age 54 years) with regurgitation requiring valve repair with annuloplasty without concomitant aortic root surgery were prospectively referred for CMR and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) one year after the operation. Two aortic annulus stabilization techniques were used: external, circumferential annuloplasty (EA), and subcommissural annuloplasty (SCA). RESULTS: 11 patients received EA and 10 patients were treated using SCA. There was no in-hospital mortality and all patients survived the follow-up period (median: 12.6 months (first quartile: 6.6; third quartile: 14.1). CMR showed strong correlation between postoperative aortic recurrent regurgitant fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r = 0.62; p = 0.003) as well as left ventricular ejection fraction (r = -0.53; p = 0.01). Patients treated with EA as compared with SCA had larger anatomic aortic valve area measured by CMR (3.5 (2.5; 4.0) vs. 2.5 cm(2) (2.0; 3.4); p = 0.04). In both EA and SCA group, aortic valve area below 3.5 cm(2) correlated with no regurgitation recurrency. EA (vs. SCA) was associated with lower peak transvalvular aortic gradients (10 (6; 17) vs. 21 mmHg (15; 27); p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The repair of the bicuspid aortic valve provides significant postoperative reverse remodelling, provided no recurrent regurgitation and durable reduction annuloplasty can be achieved. EA is associated with lower transvalvular gradients and higher aortic valve area assessed by CMR, compared to SCA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7789766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77897662021-01-07 The evaluation of annuloplasty in bicuspid aortic valve repair using cardiac magnetic resonance Jasinski, Marek J. Miszalski-Jamka, Karol Kosiorowska, Kinga Gocol, Radoslaw Wenzel-Jasinska, Izabella Bielicki, Grzegorz Berezowski, Mikolaj Lukaszewski, Marceli Kansy, Andrzej Deja, Marek A. BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The incompetent bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) can be replaced or repaired using various surgical techniques. This study sought to assess the efficacy of external annuloplasty and postoperative reverse remodelling using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and compare the results of external and subcommissural annuloplasty. METHODS: Out of a total of 200 BAV repair performed between 2004 and 2018, 21 consecutive patients (median age 54 years) with regurgitation requiring valve repair with annuloplasty without concomitant aortic root surgery were prospectively referred for CMR and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) one year after the operation. Two aortic annulus stabilization techniques were used: external, circumferential annuloplasty (EA), and subcommissural annuloplasty (SCA). RESULTS: 11 patients received EA and 10 patients were treated using SCA. There was no in-hospital mortality and all patients survived the follow-up period (median: 12.6 months (first quartile: 6.6; third quartile: 14.1). CMR showed strong correlation between postoperative aortic recurrent regurgitant fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r = 0.62; p = 0.003) as well as left ventricular ejection fraction (r = -0.53; p = 0.01). Patients treated with EA as compared with SCA had larger anatomic aortic valve area measured by CMR (3.5 (2.5; 4.0) vs. 2.5 cm(2) (2.0; 3.4); p = 0.04). In both EA and SCA group, aortic valve area below 3.5 cm(2) correlated with no regurgitation recurrency. EA (vs. SCA) was associated with lower peak transvalvular aortic gradients (10 (6; 17) vs. 21 mmHg (15; 27); p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The repair of the bicuspid aortic valve provides significant postoperative reverse remodelling, provided no recurrent regurgitation and durable reduction annuloplasty can be achieved. EA is associated with lower transvalvular gradients and higher aortic valve area assessed by CMR, compared to SCA. BioMed Central 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7789766/ /pubmed/33407164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01831-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jasinski, Marek J. Miszalski-Jamka, Karol Kosiorowska, Kinga Gocol, Radoslaw Wenzel-Jasinska, Izabella Bielicki, Grzegorz Berezowski, Mikolaj Lukaszewski, Marceli Kansy, Andrzej Deja, Marek A. The evaluation of annuloplasty in bicuspid aortic valve repair using cardiac magnetic resonance |
title | The evaluation of annuloplasty in bicuspid aortic valve repair using cardiac magnetic resonance |
title_full | The evaluation of annuloplasty in bicuspid aortic valve repair using cardiac magnetic resonance |
title_fullStr | The evaluation of annuloplasty in bicuspid aortic valve repair using cardiac magnetic resonance |
title_full_unstemmed | The evaluation of annuloplasty in bicuspid aortic valve repair using cardiac magnetic resonance |
title_short | The evaluation of annuloplasty in bicuspid aortic valve repair using cardiac magnetic resonance |
title_sort | evaluation of annuloplasty in bicuspid aortic valve repair using cardiac magnetic resonance |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33407164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-020-01831-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jasinskimarekj theevaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT miszalskijamkakarol theevaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT kosiorowskakinga theevaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT gocolradoslaw theevaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT wenzeljasinskaizabella theevaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT bielickigrzegorz theevaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT berezowskimikolaj theevaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT lukaszewskimarceli theevaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT kansyandrzej theevaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT dejamareka theevaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT jasinskimarekj evaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT miszalskijamkakarol evaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT kosiorowskakinga evaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT gocolradoslaw evaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT wenzeljasinskaizabella evaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT bielickigrzegorz evaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT berezowskimikolaj evaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT lukaszewskimarceli evaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT kansyandrzej evaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance AT dejamareka evaluationofannuloplastyinbicuspidaorticvalverepairusingcardiacmagneticresonance |