Cargando…

Harmonizing Cigar Survey Data Across Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science, Center for Tobacco Products, and Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Studies: The Cigar Collaborative Research Group

INTRODUCTION: Cigars are a popular tobacco product of choice for youth and young adults. Despite growing interest in cigar research, there are gaps in the available literature limiting an ability to set evidence-based policies. Too small research samples, the heterogeneity of types of cigars when as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fishbein, Howard, Bauer, Dan, Yu, Qilu, Mermelstein, Robin, Jones, Dina, Miller, Amy, Harrell, Melissa, Loukas, Alexandra, Sterling, Kymberle, Colip, Brittany, Mittl, Beth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31665435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntz201
_version_ 1783633343070339072
author Fishbein, Howard
Bauer, Dan
Yu, Qilu
Mermelstein, Robin
Jones, Dina
Miller, Amy
Harrell, Melissa
Loukas, Alexandra
Sterling, Kymberle
Colip, Brittany
Mittl, Beth
author_facet Fishbein, Howard
Bauer, Dan
Yu, Qilu
Mermelstein, Robin
Jones, Dina
Miller, Amy
Harrell, Melissa
Loukas, Alexandra
Sterling, Kymberle
Colip, Brittany
Mittl, Beth
author_sort Fishbein, Howard
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cigars are a popular tobacco product of choice for youth and young adults. Despite growing interest in cigar research, there are gaps in the available literature limiting an ability to set evidence-based policies. Too small research samples, the heterogeneity of types of cigars when asking a single question about use, makes analyzing data difficult. Given the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) authority granted in 2016 to regulate cigars, and its popularity, data to better understand use and preference for cigars will help FDA set appropriate regulatory policies. METHODS: We harmonized cigar survey data previously collected by five independent tobacco regulatory science survey research projects. Data supplying participants included three Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science, one Center for Tobacco Products grantee, and data from Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study’s public use dataset. RESULTS: Analyzing 92 data variables from across five studies, and applying a rigorous data harmonization protocol, we report findings on 24 key cigar use variables. The step by step protocol for harmonizing is presented. Selected findings showing strict reproducibility across all five studies reveal youth 17–19 years at highest risk for cigar initiation; relative reproducibility shows males more likely to try cigars than females but with significant differences in magnitude across studies; and areas of inconsistent reproducibility are revealed when evaluating brand preferences. CONCLUSION: Harmonizing data from multiple sources fosters a broader view of the robustness and generalizability of survey data than that from a single source. These observations raise awareness to look for the highest degree of reproducibility among and across data sources to inform policy. IMPLICATIONS: Harmonizing data from discrete datasets provides insights into cigar initiation and use and is presented showing opportunities, challenges, and solutions. Comparing observational data from PATH and four independent research studies provides a best-practices approach and example of data synthesis for the tobacco research community. The dataset of five studies offers a look at the degree of confidence in analyzing harmonized survey results. Variable conclusions raise the need to strive for the highest degree of reproducibility, to best understand the behaviors of cigar users, and allow for the future development of the most effective interventions to alter tobacco use patterns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7789955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77899552021-01-12 Harmonizing Cigar Survey Data Across Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science, Center for Tobacco Products, and Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Studies: The Cigar Collaborative Research Group Fishbein, Howard Bauer, Dan Yu, Qilu Mermelstein, Robin Jones, Dina Miller, Amy Harrell, Melissa Loukas, Alexandra Sterling, Kymberle Colip, Brittany Mittl, Beth Nicotine Tob Res Original Investigations INTRODUCTION: Cigars are a popular tobacco product of choice for youth and young adults. Despite growing interest in cigar research, there are gaps in the available literature limiting an ability to set evidence-based policies. Too small research samples, the heterogeneity of types of cigars when asking a single question about use, makes analyzing data difficult. Given the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) authority granted in 2016 to regulate cigars, and its popularity, data to better understand use and preference for cigars will help FDA set appropriate regulatory policies. METHODS: We harmonized cigar survey data previously collected by five independent tobacco regulatory science survey research projects. Data supplying participants included three Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science, one Center for Tobacco Products grantee, and data from Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study’s public use dataset. RESULTS: Analyzing 92 data variables from across five studies, and applying a rigorous data harmonization protocol, we report findings on 24 key cigar use variables. The step by step protocol for harmonizing is presented. Selected findings showing strict reproducibility across all five studies reveal youth 17–19 years at highest risk for cigar initiation; relative reproducibility shows males more likely to try cigars than females but with significant differences in magnitude across studies; and areas of inconsistent reproducibility are revealed when evaluating brand preferences. CONCLUSION: Harmonizing data from multiple sources fosters a broader view of the robustness and generalizability of survey data than that from a single source. These observations raise awareness to look for the highest degree of reproducibility among and across data sources to inform policy. IMPLICATIONS: Harmonizing data from discrete datasets provides insights into cigar initiation and use and is presented showing opportunities, challenges, and solutions. Comparing observational data from PATH and four independent research studies provides a best-practices approach and example of data synthesis for the tobacco research community. The dataset of five studies offers a look at the degree of confidence in analyzing harmonized survey results. Variable conclusions raise the need to strive for the highest degree of reproducibility, to best understand the behaviors of cigar users, and allow for the future development of the most effective interventions to alter tobacco use patterns. Oxford University Press 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7789955/ /pubmed/31665435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntz201 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Investigations
Fishbein, Howard
Bauer, Dan
Yu, Qilu
Mermelstein, Robin
Jones, Dina
Miller, Amy
Harrell, Melissa
Loukas, Alexandra
Sterling, Kymberle
Colip, Brittany
Mittl, Beth
Harmonizing Cigar Survey Data Across Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science, Center for Tobacco Products, and Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Studies: The Cigar Collaborative Research Group
title Harmonizing Cigar Survey Data Across Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science, Center for Tobacco Products, and Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Studies: The Cigar Collaborative Research Group
title_full Harmonizing Cigar Survey Data Across Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science, Center for Tobacco Products, and Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Studies: The Cigar Collaborative Research Group
title_fullStr Harmonizing Cigar Survey Data Across Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science, Center for Tobacco Products, and Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Studies: The Cigar Collaborative Research Group
title_full_unstemmed Harmonizing Cigar Survey Data Across Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science, Center for Tobacco Products, and Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Studies: The Cigar Collaborative Research Group
title_short Harmonizing Cigar Survey Data Across Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science, Center for Tobacco Products, and Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Studies: The Cigar Collaborative Research Group
title_sort harmonizing cigar survey data across tobacco centers of regulatory science, center for tobacco products, and population assessment of tobacco and health studies: the cigar collaborative research group
topic Original Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7789955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31665435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntz201
work_keys_str_mv AT fishbeinhoward harmonizingcigarsurveydataacrosstobaccocentersofregulatorysciencecenterfortobaccoproductsandpopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthstudiesthecigarcollaborativeresearchgroup
AT bauerdan harmonizingcigarsurveydataacrosstobaccocentersofregulatorysciencecenterfortobaccoproductsandpopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthstudiesthecigarcollaborativeresearchgroup
AT yuqilu harmonizingcigarsurveydataacrosstobaccocentersofregulatorysciencecenterfortobaccoproductsandpopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthstudiesthecigarcollaborativeresearchgroup
AT mermelsteinrobin harmonizingcigarsurveydataacrosstobaccocentersofregulatorysciencecenterfortobaccoproductsandpopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthstudiesthecigarcollaborativeresearchgroup
AT jonesdina harmonizingcigarsurveydataacrosstobaccocentersofregulatorysciencecenterfortobaccoproductsandpopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthstudiesthecigarcollaborativeresearchgroup
AT milleramy harmonizingcigarsurveydataacrosstobaccocentersofregulatorysciencecenterfortobaccoproductsandpopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthstudiesthecigarcollaborativeresearchgroup
AT harrellmelissa harmonizingcigarsurveydataacrosstobaccocentersofregulatorysciencecenterfortobaccoproductsandpopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthstudiesthecigarcollaborativeresearchgroup
AT loukasalexandra harmonizingcigarsurveydataacrosstobaccocentersofregulatorysciencecenterfortobaccoproductsandpopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthstudiesthecigarcollaborativeresearchgroup
AT sterlingkymberle harmonizingcigarsurveydataacrosstobaccocentersofregulatorysciencecenterfortobaccoproductsandpopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthstudiesthecigarcollaborativeresearchgroup
AT colipbrittany harmonizingcigarsurveydataacrosstobaccocentersofregulatorysciencecenterfortobaccoproductsandpopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthstudiesthecigarcollaborativeresearchgroup
AT mittlbeth harmonizingcigarsurveydataacrosstobaccocentersofregulatorysciencecenterfortobaccoproductsandpopulationassessmentoftobaccoandhealthstudiesthecigarcollaborativeresearchgroup