Cargando…
A review of malignant pleural mesothelioma in a large North East UK pleural centre
OBJECTIVES: The National Mesothelioma Audit 2020 showed Northumbria to have low rates of histopathological confirmation, treatment and one-year survival rates for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We hypothesized that an internal analysis over a 10-year period provides valuable insights into pre...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
De Gruyter
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33506102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pp-2020-0144 |
_version_ | 1783633371703803904 |
---|---|
author | Murphy, Declan C. Mount, Alexander Starkie, Fiona Taylor, Leah Aujayeb, Avinash |
author_facet | Murphy, Declan C. Mount, Alexander Starkie, Fiona Taylor, Leah Aujayeb, Avinash |
author_sort | Murphy, Declan C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The National Mesothelioma Audit 2020 showed Northumbria to have low rates of histopathological confirmation, treatment and one-year survival rates for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We hypothesized that an internal analysis over a 10-year period provides valuable insights into presentation, diagnosis, treatment and outcomes. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective case series of all confirmed MPM patients between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2019 was performed. Demographics, clinical, radiological and histopathological characteristics and outcomes were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS V26.0. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients had MPM. About 86% were male, mean age 75.7 years. Dyspnoea (77.4%) and chest pain (38.5%) were commonest symptoms. 64.9 and 71.4% had pleural thickening and effusion, respectively. About 86.8% had at least one attempt to obtain a tissue biopsy, but histopathological confirmation in only 108 (43.7%). About 66.3% with PS 0 and 1 (62.7% of total cohort) had at least one anti-cancer therapy. Death within 12 months was associated with disease progression within 6 months (p≤0.001). Chemotherapy (p≤0.001) and epithelioid histological subtype (p=0.01) were protective. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms known epidemiology of MPM, demonstrates variability in practices and highlights how some NMA recommendations are not met. This provides the incentive for a regional mesothelioma multi-disciplinary meeting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7790177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | De Gruyter |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77901772021-01-26 A review of malignant pleural mesothelioma in a large North East UK pleural centre Murphy, Declan C. Mount, Alexander Starkie, Fiona Taylor, Leah Aujayeb, Avinash Pleura Peritoneum Research Article OBJECTIVES: The National Mesothelioma Audit 2020 showed Northumbria to have low rates of histopathological confirmation, treatment and one-year survival rates for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We hypothesized that an internal analysis over a 10-year period provides valuable insights into presentation, diagnosis, treatment and outcomes. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective case series of all confirmed MPM patients between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2019 was performed. Demographics, clinical, radiological and histopathological characteristics and outcomes were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS V26.0. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients had MPM. About 86% were male, mean age 75.7 years. Dyspnoea (77.4%) and chest pain (38.5%) were commonest symptoms. 64.9 and 71.4% had pleural thickening and effusion, respectively. About 86.8% had at least one attempt to obtain a tissue biopsy, but histopathological confirmation in only 108 (43.7%). About 66.3% with PS 0 and 1 (62.7% of total cohort) had at least one anti-cancer therapy. Death within 12 months was associated with disease progression within 6 months (p≤0.001). Chemotherapy (p≤0.001) and epithelioid histological subtype (p=0.01) were protective. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms known epidemiology of MPM, demonstrates variability in practices and highlights how some NMA recommendations are not met. This provides the incentive for a regional mesothelioma multi-disciplinary meeting. De Gruyter 2020-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7790177/ /pubmed/33506102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pp-2020-0144 Text en © 2020 Declan C. Murphy et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Murphy, Declan C. Mount, Alexander Starkie, Fiona Taylor, Leah Aujayeb, Avinash A review of malignant pleural mesothelioma in a large North East UK pleural centre |
title | A review of malignant pleural mesothelioma in a large North East UK pleural centre |
title_full | A review of malignant pleural mesothelioma in a large North East UK pleural centre |
title_fullStr | A review of malignant pleural mesothelioma in a large North East UK pleural centre |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of malignant pleural mesothelioma in a large North East UK pleural centre |
title_short | A review of malignant pleural mesothelioma in a large North East UK pleural centre |
title_sort | review of malignant pleural mesothelioma in a large north east uk pleural centre |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7790177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33506102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pp-2020-0144 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murphydeclanc areviewofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomainalargenortheastukpleuralcentre AT mountalexander areviewofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomainalargenortheastukpleuralcentre AT starkiefiona areviewofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomainalargenortheastukpleuralcentre AT taylorleah areviewofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomainalargenortheastukpleuralcentre AT aujayebavinash areviewofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomainalargenortheastukpleuralcentre AT murphydeclanc reviewofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomainalargenortheastukpleuralcentre AT mountalexander reviewofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomainalargenortheastukpleuralcentre AT starkiefiona reviewofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomainalargenortheastukpleuralcentre AT taylorleah reviewofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomainalargenortheastukpleuralcentre AT aujayebavinash reviewofmalignantpleuralmesotheliomainalargenortheastukpleuralcentre |